From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2003-04-27T14:52:28+09:00
Subject: Re: raa.succ - independent reviews

On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 03:02:14AM +0900, Simon Strandgaard wrote:
> It would be nice to get ruby-projects evaluated by independent
> people. So that when you are browsing RAA, you can see 
> 
> 1) how well documentated a project is.  Is the documentation in
> English/Japanise/Germane?  Is it well written, intuitive?
> 
> 2) is it dead/alive/abandon.. should I choose another project to base 
> my code on? 
> 
> 3) is it alpha/beta/stable ?
> 
> 4) license ?
> 
> 5) maybe some text about user-experience with the package?
> 
> These reviews could maybe encourage people to get a quality stamp 
> on their projects :-)

This all only needs loose integration w/ RAA.rucc. I mean that this
would work best once we have a standard metadata format so these things
can be extracted directly from the "metapackages", but in the meantime
it should be possible to enrich RAA even as it stands now: this would
essentially mean having our own Freshmeat.

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

Linux: The OS people choose without $200,000,000 of persuasion.
	-- Mike Coleman