From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2003-04-09T20:06:35+09:00
Subject: Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0"
>     on 03/04/09, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
>
> |I had problems on Solaris building 1.8.0 snapshots with less that
> |3.x.  I succeeded with 3.2.2.  Do you have values for x in "3.x"
> |that are known to fail?  Have you any test cases for this bug so I
> |can try to reproduce it on the machines for which I have built a 1.8
> |snapshot?
>
> I'm using gcc 3.2.3 without any problem.  But I can't tell whether
> 3.2.3 is OK, or just lucky I am.  Any report is welcome.

Just to clarify: Is that really 3.2.*3*?
http://gcc.gnu.org/index.html
would suggest this is not out yet?
(Meanwhile I'm trying to rebuild rubicon on an alpha to get some
more reports out to you, on how that performs.)
>
> 							matz.
>
>
        Hugh