[#67346] Future of test suites for Ruby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I'll try to be brief so we can discuss all this. tl;dr: RubySpec is
19 messages
2015/01/05
[#67353] Re: Future of test suites for Ruby
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2015/01/05
2015-01-06 7:18 GMT+09:00 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#67444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10718] [Open] IO#close should not raise IOError on closed IO objects. — akr@...
Issue #10718 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
3 messages
2015/01/09
[#67689] Keyword Arguments — Anthony Crumley <anthony.crumley@...>
Please forgive my ignorance as I am new to MRI development and am still
5 messages
2015/01/20
[#67733] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5 — normalperson@...
Issue #10761 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2015/01/21
[#67736] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/01/22
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#67772] Preventing Redundant Email Messages — Jeremy Evans <code@...>
For a long time, I've wondered why I sometimes receive redundant email
5 messages
2015/01/23
[ruby-core:67667] [ruby-trunk - Misc #10754] Tiny optimisation of Set#include?
From:
normalperson@...
Date:
2015-01-18 01:58:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #67667
Issue #10754 has been updated by Eric Wong. This speedup probably happens because Hash#[] has an optimized dispatch VM instruction (opt_aref in insns.def) while Hash#include? does not. Seems like an OK change to make, I'll commit in a few days unless others raise objections. ---------------------------------------- Misc #10754: Tiny optimisation of Set#include? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10754#change-51082 * Author: Ismael Abreu * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Hi! I'm not sure if this a relevant optimisation but here it goes. A simple way to improve Set#include? I don't think there should be any side effects with this change. Here are some dummy benchmarks https://gist.github.com/ismaelga/68bb3ea51b4742f65699 They are not consistent, but that should be because of garbage collection or something. Right? I've also sent a Pull Request: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/810 ---Files-------------------------------- patch.diff (544 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/