[#67346] Future of test suites for Ruby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I'll try to be brief so we can discuss all this. tl;dr: RubySpec is
19 messages
2015/01/05
[#67353] Re: Future of test suites for Ruby
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2015/01/05
2015-01-06 7:18 GMT+09:00 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#67444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10718] [Open] IO#close should not raise IOError on closed IO objects. — akr@...
Issue #10718 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
3 messages
2015/01/09
[#67689] Keyword Arguments — Anthony Crumley <anthony.crumley@...>
Please forgive my ignorance as I am new to MRI development and am still
5 messages
2015/01/20
[#67733] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5 — normalperson@...
Issue #10761 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2015/01/21
[#67736] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/01/22
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#67772] Preventing Redundant Email Messages — Jeremy Evans <code@...>
For a long time, I've wondered why I sometimes receive redundant email
5 messages
2015/01/23
[ruby-core:67786] Re: Method scope change between 2.1 and 2.2
From:
"U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Date:
2015-01-24 05:25:54 UTC
List:
ruby-core #67786
Hi,
In message "[ruby-core:67781] Method scope change between 2.1 and 2.2"
on Jan.24,2015 12:45:34, <anthony.crumley@gmail.com> wrote:
> This RubySpec specification passes in Ruby versions 2.0 and 2.1 but fails
> in 2.2 and 2.3. Is this change a regression or was it intentional?
See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10314 about this.
IMO, it cannot be said to intentional.
But it seems to be determined as a specification change.
Regards,
--
U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>