[#67346] Future of test suites for Ruby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I'll try to be brief so we can discuss all this. tl;dr: RubySpec is
19 messages
2015/01/05
[#67353] Re: Future of test suites for Ruby
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2015/01/05
2015-01-06 7:18 GMT+09:00 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#67444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10718] [Open] IO#close should not raise IOError on closed IO objects. — akr@...
Issue #10718 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
3 messages
2015/01/09
[#67689] Keyword Arguments — Anthony Crumley <anthony.crumley@...>
Please forgive my ignorance as I am new to MRI development and am still
5 messages
2015/01/20
[#67733] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5 — normalperson@...
Issue #10761 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2015/01/21
[#67736] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/01/22
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#67772] Preventing Redundant Email Messages — Jeremy Evans <code@...>
For a long time, I've wondered why I sometimes receive redundant email
5 messages
2015/01/23
[ruby-core:67271] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10685] Segfault from keyword rest arg when coercing an object that defines to_hash
From:
normalperson@...
Date:
2015-01-01 00:38:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #67271
Issue #10685 has been updated by Eric Wong.
Thanks for the report, looks like nobu committed a fix as r49088
> This spec appears to cause the segfault mentioned in
> http://rubini.us/2014/12/31/matz-s-ruby-developers-don-t-use-rubyspec/
> today.
Fwiw, I do run "make test-rubyspec" before I commit,
but that's naruse's repo which I guess is different..
Like many projects nowadays, I won't bother contributing to rubyspec
because it requires an account on a proprietary service provider.
Free Software (e.g. Ruby) needs Free tools:
http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
----------------------------------------
Bug #10685: Segfault from keyword rest arg when coercing an object that defines to_hash
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10685#change-50735
* Author: Charles Nutter
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: 2.2.0p0
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
This spec appears to cause the segfault mentioned in http://rubini.us/2014/12/31/matz-s-ruby-developers-don-t-use-rubyspec/ today.
```
it "calls #to_hash on the last element if keyword arguments are present" do
obj = mock("destructure block keyword arguments")
obj.should_receive(:to_hash).and_return({x: 9})
result = m([1, 2, 3, obj]) { |a, *b, c, **k| [a, b, c, k] }
result.should == [1, [2], 3, {x: 9}]
end
```
I tried to boil it down to a shorter example and was not able to isolate it from RubySpec/mspec entanglement.
Here's the full dump including the last spec line that starts to run (the spec above): https://gist.github.com/headius/5d52df923eb615729ca3
I ran it using mspec gem from rubyspec's "archive" branch using "mspec ci -f s language".
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/