From: Anthony Crumley Date: 2015-01-28T04:16:43+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:67848] Re: Method scope change between 2.1 and 2.2 --047d7bdc1792a11f2d050daea32f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Changed the RubySpec related to this issue. https://github.com/anthonycrumley/rubyspec/commit/69beb84864ade8445bd71e171ff3d6472d62c49a On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 11:26:06 PM U.Nakamura wrote: > Hi, > > In message "[ruby-core:67781] Method scope change between 2.1 and 2.2" > on Jan.24,2015 12:45:34, wrote: > > This RubySpec specification passes in Ruby versions 2.0 and 2.1 but fails > > in 2.2 and 2.3. Is this change a regression or was it intentional? > > See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10314 about this. > > IMO, it cannot be said to intentional. > But it seems to be determined as a specification change. > > > Regards, > -- > U.Nakamura > > --047d7bdc1792a11f2d050daea32f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Changed the RubySpec related to this issue. =C2=A0https://github.com/anthonycrumley/rubyspec/commit/69beb84864ade8445bd71e= 171ff3d6472d62c49a

On Fri Jan 23 2015= at 11:26:06 PM U.Nakamura <usa= @garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

Hi,

In message "[ruby-core:67781] Method scope change between 2.1 and 2.2&= quot;
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 on Jan.24,2015 12:45:34, <anthony.crumley@gmail.com> wrote:
> This RubySpec specification passes in Ruby versions 2.0 and 2.1 but fa= ils
> in 2.2 and 2.3.=C2=A0 Is this change a regression or was it intentiona= l?

See h= ttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10314 about this.

IMO, it cannot be said to intentional.
But it seems to be determined as a specification change.

Regards,
--
U.Nakamura <u= sa@garbagecollect.jp>

--047d7bdc1792a11f2d050daea32f--