[#63439] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> >>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

22 messages 2003/02/01
[#63482] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63485] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:30:12AM +0100, ts wrote:

[#63486] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63491] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

> Y> I'm afraid I won't give you a way to turn it off. It is "quite

[#63492] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63495] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:36:52PM +0100, ts wrote:

[#63496] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63479] no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...>

is there any way to specifiy that a method can not be overrided? perfereably

20 messages 2003/02/02
[#63483] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:51:08PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:

[#63487] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 06:41:45PM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63500] Re: no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/02

On Sunday 02 February 2003 03:34 am, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63517] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:35:26PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:

[#63527] Re: no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/02

On Sunday 02 February 2003 09:01 am, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63553] What is the best Ruby IDE you think? — Nicolay Vasiliev <n.vasiliev@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2003/02/03

[#63600] ruby-dev summary 19437-19455 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2003/02/03

[#63751] Embedding Ruby in C code — Szymon Drejewicz <drejewic@...>

How to compile this file:

24 messages 2003/02/05

[#63782] Error in Complex — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

18 messages 2003/02/05

[#63829] locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

Hold on, this post takes a few twists and turns. Consider it an exercise

41 messages 2003/02/06
[#63832] Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2003/02/06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#63859] Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2003/02/06

[#63862] Blogging software — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

Anyone done any work on a ruby-powered weblog?

15 messages 2003/02/06

[#63906] The way of the Gentoo — "MikkelFJ" <mikkelfj-anti-spam@...>

22 messages 2003/02/06

[#63938] Private lvalue methods unusable? — Steven Smolinski <steven.smolinski@...>

I'm learning Ruby, and trying to grasp the non-declarative concept with

14 messages 2003/02/06

[#64018] easy access for CGI query — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...>

hello,

14 messages 2003/02/07

[#64063] Tortured by the Dependency Daemons — Jonathan Smith <jonathan.w.smith@...>

The instructions for installation state, "In RWiki package for your

16 messages 2003/02/08

[#64068] Relative performance of Ruby templating systems — "Gabriel Emerson" <egabriel@...>

I decided to run Siege against Mod Ruby, ERuby, Amrita, PageTemplate,

11 messages 2003/02/08

[#64146] ruby-dev summary 19457-19539 — Kazuo Saito <ksaito@...>

10 messages 2003/02/09
[#64151] Operator reordering, good idea? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 19457-19539) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2003/02/09

Hi, I'm just a beginner buy program, but...

[#64164] Trapping Access/Modification of Objects — Jason Voegele <jason@...>

After a long delay, I'm now starting to work on the RubyGOODS library

13 messages 2003/02/09

[#64242] Source code for "Ruby Developer's Guide" — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>

Hi People,

15 messages 2003/02/10

[#64247] turning modules into classes — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

Did you ever want to instantiate a module?

28 messages 2003/02/10
[#64251] Re: turning modules into classes — dblack@... 2003/02/10

Hi --

[#64278] inheriting from base classes — dblack@...

Hi --

37 messages 2003/02/11

[#64329] Range#length? — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

What happened to Range#length and Range#size?

39 messages 2003/02/11

[#64392] String frustration — "Tim Kynerd" <tim@...>

Hi everyone,

23 messages 2003/02/11

[#64421] Name for #=== based assertion — <nathaniel@...>

I've had several requests that an assertion based on #=== be added to

16 messages 2003/02/12

[#64470] Need regex help (or bug in match) — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

17 messages 2003/02/12
[#64471] Re: Need regex help (or bug in match) — dblack@... 2003/02/12

Hi --

[#64549] Re: Can we attack the 'not enough libraries' thing straight on? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/02/12

----- Original Message -----

[#64524] mod_ruby insecury op — Daniel Bretoi <lists@...>

[Wed Feb 12 12:00:16 2003] [error] mod_ruby: error in ruby

15 messages 2003/02/12

[#64527] Windows support — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2003/02/12

[#64528] hm,... arr[1]["name"] — "daniel" <offstuff@...>

$arr = Array();

16 messages 2003/02/12

[#64575] Re: Lexical scope and closures — patrickdlogan@...

> (3) some other syntax will be introduced for cases where...

53 messages 2003/02/12
[#64647] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +0900, patrickdlogan@attbi.com wrote:

[#64670] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:44:36PM +0900, Mauricio Fern?ndez wrote:

[#64678] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/13

On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:54 am, Brian Candler wrote:

[#64750] Re: Lexical scope and closures — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/14

Hi,

[#64751] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/14

On Thursday 13 February 2003 06:44 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#64755] Re: Lexical scope and closures — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/14

Hi,

[#64756] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/14

On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:42 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#64855] Re: Lexical scope and closures — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...> 2003/02/15

Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:06:31 +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> pisze:

[#64920] Re: Lexical scope and closures — dblack@... 2003/02/16

Hi --

[#64602] von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — <jbritt@...>

Since this is something of a permathread on this list I though this would be of interest:

33 messages 2003/02/13
[#64606] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +0900

[#64778] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...> 2003/02/14

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:15:42 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> pisze:

[#64789] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/14

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:27:10PM +0900, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:

[#64793] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2003/02/14

Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#64804] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/14

On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:05:19AM +0900, Matt Armstrong wrote:

[#64811] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Dan Sugalski <dan@...> 2003/02/14

At 4:18 AM +0900 2/15/03, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#64626] Why does Array#compact! return the array, but uniq! return a count? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

11 messages 2003/02/13

[#64752] why html template systems never use new tags? — Tom Sawyer <transami@...>

curious, i've realized that i have never seen any html template systems that

16 messages 2003/02/14

[#64753] module This::Encompassing::That — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>

Today, I decided I was tired of

45 messages 2003/02/14
[#64754] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/14

Hi --

[#64757] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...> 2003/02/14

dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:

[#64850] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/15

On Friday, February 14, 2003, 2:00:56 PM, Bil wrote:

[#64859] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/15

Hi --

[#64883] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/15

On Sunday, February 16, 2003, 4:01:47 AM, dblack wrote:

[#64986] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#64987] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#64988] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#64990] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#65046] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#65078] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/18

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#65085] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65137] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/18

On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 11:56:41 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#65151] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65160] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — nobu.nokada@... 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65178] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65211] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — <nathaniel@...> 2003/02/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

[#65225] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65230] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/19

Hi --

[#65235] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#64785] Segmation fault in combination of heavy socket I/O and multi-threading — Idan Sofer <idan@...>

This is one bug(Or perhaps even a set of bugs) I ran into more then once

10 messages 2003/02/14
[#65118] Re: [BUG] Segmation fault in combination of heavy socket I/O and multi-threading — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/18

>>>>> "I" == Idan Sofer <idan@idanso.dyndns.org> writes:

[#65001] How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

I have an existing class Foo, and existing objects of that class.

42 messages 2003/02/17
[#65017] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#65081] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/18

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:46:59AM -0800, Bill Kelly wrote:

[#65084] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65110] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/18

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:52:12PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#65112] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65125] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/18

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:08:07AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#65179] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65196] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/19

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:19:15AM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#65201] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/19

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:02:21AM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#65090] $SAFE and creating New objects (File) — "\"RayZ\" Andrew V Rumm" <rayz@...>

Sorry for noob question

16 messages 2003/02/18

[#65141] String#+ operatorbroken? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

17 messages 2003/02/19

[#65159] Sourcing files — Bjn Lindstr <bkhl@...>

I like using source files as configuration files for my hacks.

13 messages 2003/02/19

[#65167] Ruby scripts for daily unix system administration — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets@...>

Hi, I'm a newbie looking for any example of writing ruby script to do my

22 messages 2003/02/19

[#65212] Rite Status? — Travis Whitton <whitton@...>

Hello all - I was just wondering if Rite is still in development and if it's

16 messages 2003/02/19

[#65270] optimization question — Travis Whitton <whitton@...>

Hello - A friend and I have been working on a Ruby implementation of a

39 messages 2003/02/19

[#65292] Curses base windowing system — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets@...>

As I have only limited resources on my laptop(memory, diskspace, and CPU

17 messages 2003/02/20

[#65331] Return Values of [] for Array, Hash,... (ruby 1.6.8) — Michael Bruschkewitz <brusch2@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2003/02/20

[#65351] proc {} vs. Method#to_proc — dblack@...

Hi --

22 messages 2003/02/20

[#65424] Regexp help: Parsing a CSV file — Tim Bates <tim@...>

I've dumped a CSV (comma separated values) file from Excel, and I want to

27 messages 2003/02/21

[#65454] xml-configfile 0.8.0 — Maik Schmidt <contact@...>

Yo!

14 messages 2003/02/21

[#65473] Style question: using 'block_given?' — Bill Dueber <wdueber@...>

I'm new to Ruby, and want to know what The Best Way To Do It is...

21 messages 2003/02/21
[#65485] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/21

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:00:44AM +0900, Bill Dueber wrote:

[#65494] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/21

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 06:05:23AM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#65498] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/21

> This is the class instance variable police. Freeze! Keine Bewegung!

[#65511] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — dblack@... 2003/02/22

Hi --

[#65514] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/22

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 04:05:59PM +0900, dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:

[#65526] embedded docs — Wojciech Kaczmarek <schatten@...>

Is ruby going to have (in a reasonably predictable future :) embedded

50 messages 2003/02/22
[#65567] Re: embedded docs — Simon Cozens <simon@...> 2003/02/23

Brian Wisti <brian@coolnamehere.com> writes:

[#65572] Re: embedded docs — Piers Harding <piers@...> 2003/02/23

[#65573] Re: embedded docs — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/23

I agree that this is very important.

[#65576] Internationalization (Re: embedded docs) — Brian Wisti <brian@...> 2003/02/23

On Sunday 23 February 2003 09:18 am, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:

[#65577] Re: Internationalization (Re: embedded docs) — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/23

On Sunday 23 February 2003 10:53 am, Brian Wisti wrote:

[#65601] ANN: REXML 2.5.7 and 2.4.7 — ser@... (Sean Russell)

Two, two, TWO releases for the price of one!

13 messages 2003/02/24

[#65619] Coding challenge: Space-separated constants — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I'm issuing this challenge because I'm

12 messages 2003/02/24

[#65632] Happy Birthday, Ruby, and an announcement.... — dblack@...

Dear everyone,

18 messages 2003/02/24

[#65644] Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>

All,

26 messages 2003/02/24
[#65779] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65784] Re: Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/26

It is working now with line numbers. What is the syntax for breaking at a

[#65786] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65790] Re: Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/26

It may, I'll try it, but it really doesn't do much good even if it does work.

[#65791] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65660] Objectify the mersenne twister in 1.8? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

17 messages 2003/02/24

[#65802] Ruby in Performance Testing — E F van de Laar <emiel@...>

Rubyists,

18 messages 2003/02/26

[#65835] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +0900, <jbritt@ruby-doc.org> <jbritt@ruby-doc.org> pisze:

12 messages 2003/02/26

[#65854] Ruby Compile-time optimization — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

52 messages 2003/02/27

[#65884] Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>

I have not been able to change the behavior of IO::read() to non-blocking.

27 messages 2003/02/27
[#65920] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — nobu.nokada@... 2003/02/27

Hi,

[#65937] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/27

This is with 1.8 CVS head on linux kernel 2.4.20.

[#66126] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — nobu.nokada@... 2003/03/02

Hi,

[#66146] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/03/02

I guess I must be missing something, but I see nothing here that would expose

[#66149] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/03/02

Hi,

[#65907] XmlConfigFile usage — Ollivier Robert <roberto@...>

Hello,

31 messages 2003/02/27
[#65943] Re: XmlConfigFile usage — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...> 2003/02/27

> I underestimated the need for true XML serialization and I think it's

[#65945] Re: XmlConfigFile usage — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/27

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:53:47AM +0900, Chris Morris wrote:

[#65991] I'm stuck — Friedrich Dominicus <frido@...>

Well my problem sounds IMHO trivial.

31 messages 2003/02/28

Re: irb idea: return value history

From: "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>
Date: 2003-02-08 12:20:43 UTC
List: ruby-talk #64089
----- Original Message -----
[snip]
/num      -->  $return_values[num]
// or /!  -->  $return_values.last
/*        -->  $return_values.each {|val| puts val.inspect}
               # not inspect if flag is set?
----------------------------

On second thought, you would also want to be able to use the old return
values in other expressions, and not necessarily always at the beginning of
the line (though I probably do that most frequently).  So maybe a shorter
name than `$return_values' would be best.

  irb(main):022:0> RV[12] + RV[21]
  => "hello world"

Maybe a constant would be better?  `RV' for "returned values"?  But for the
record, I still like the slash tricks from above (/12, //, /*, others?).

Chris


In This Thread