[#63439] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> >>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

22 messages 2003/02/01
[#63482] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63485] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:30:12AM +0100, ts wrote:

[#63486] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63491] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

> Y> I'm afraid I won't give you a way to turn it off. It is "quite

[#63492] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63495] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:36:52PM +0100, ts wrote:

[#63496] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63479] no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...>

is there any way to specifiy that a method can not be overrided? perfereably

20 messages 2003/02/02
[#63483] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:51:08PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:

[#63487] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 06:41:45PM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63500] Re: no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/02

On Sunday 02 February 2003 03:34 am, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63517] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:35:26PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:

[#63527] Re: no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/02

On Sunday 02 February 2003 09:01 am, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63553] What is the best Ruby IDE you think? — Nicolay Vasiliev <n.vasiliev@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2003/02/03

[#63600] ruby-dev summary 19437-19455 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2003/02/03

[#63751] Embedding Ruby in C code — Szymon Drejewicz <drejewic@...>

How to compile this file:

24 messages 2003/02/05

[#63782] Error in Complex — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

18 messages 2003/02/05

[#63829] locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

Hold on, this post takes a few twists and turns. Consider it an exercise

41 messages 2003/02/06
[#63832] Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2003/02/06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#63859] Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2003/02/06

[#63862] Blogging software — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

Anyone done any work on a ruby-powered weblog?

15 messages 2003/02/06

[#63906] The way of the Gentoo — "MikkelFJ" <mikkelfj-anti-spam@...>

22 messages 2003/02/06

[#63938] Private lvalue methods unusable? — Steven Smolinski <steven.smolinski@...>

I'm learning Ruby, and trying to grasp the non-declarative concept with

14 messages 2003/02/06

[#64018] easy access for CGI query — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...>

hello,

14 messages 2003/02/07

[#64063] Tortured by the Dependency Daemons — Jonathan Smith <jonathan.w.smith@...>

The instructions for installation state, "In RWiki package for your

16 messages 2003/02/08

[#64068] Relative performance of Ruby templating systems — "Gabriel Emerson" <egabriel@...>

I decided to run Siege against Mod Ruby, ERuby, Amrita, PageTemplate,

11 messages 2003/02/08

[#64146] ruby-dev summary 19457-19539 — Kazuo Saito <ksaito@...>

10 messages 2003/02/09
[#64151] Operator reordering, good idea? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 19457-19539) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2003/02/09

Hi, I'm just a beginner buy program, but...

[#64164] Trapping Access/Modification of Objects — Jason Voegele <jason@...>

After a long delay, I'm now starting to work on the RubyGOODS library

13 messages 2003/02/09

[#64242] Source code for "Ruby Developer's Guide" — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>

Hi People,

15 messages 2003/02/10

[#64247] turning modules into classes — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

Did you ever want to instantiate a module?

28 messages 2003/02/10
[#64251] Re: turning modules into classes — dblack@... 2003/02/10

Hi --

[#64278] inheriting from base classes — dblack@...

Hi --

37 messages 2003/02/11

[#64329] Range#length? — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

What happened to Range#length and Range#size?

39 messages 2003/02/11

[#64392] String frustration — "Tim Kynerd" <tim@...>

Hi everyone,

23 messages 2003/02/11

[#64421] Name for #=== based assertion — <nathaniel@...>

I've had several requests that an assertion based on #=== be added to

16 messages 2003/02/12

[#64470] Need regex help (or bug in match) — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

17 messages 2003/02/12
[#64471] Re: Need regex help (or bug in match) — dblack@... 2003/02/12

Hi --

[#64549] Re: Can we attack the 'not enough libraries' thing straight on? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/02/12

----- Original Message -----

[#64524] mod_ruby insecury op — Daniel Bretoi <lists@...>

[Wed Feb 12 12:00:16 2003] [error] mod_ruby: error in ruby

15 messages 2003/02/12

[#64527] Windows support — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2003/02/12

[#64528] hm,... arr[1]["name"] — "daniel" <offstuff@...>

$arr = Array();

16 messages 2003/02/12

[#64575] Re: Lexical scope and closures — patrickdlogan@...

> (3) some other syntax will be introduced for cases where...

53 messages 2003/02/12
[#64647] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +0900, patrickdlogan@attbi.com wrote:

[#64670] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:44:36PM +0900, Mauricio Fern?ndez wrote:

[#64678] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/13

On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:54 am, Brian Candler wrote:

[#64750] Re: Lexical scope and closures — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/14

Hi,

[#64751] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/14

On Thursday 13 February 2003 06:44 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#64755] Re: Lexical scope and closures — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/14

Hi,

[#64756] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/14

On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:42 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#64855] Re: Lexical scope and closures — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...> 2003/02/15

Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:06:31 +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> pisze:

[#64920] Re: Lexical scope and closures — dblack@... 2003/02/16

Hi --

[#64602] von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — <jbritt@...>

Since this is something of a permathread on this list I though this would be of interest:

33 messages 2003/02/13
[#64606] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +0900

[#64778] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...> 2003/02/14

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:15:42 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> pisze:

[#64789] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/14

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:27:10PM +0900, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:

[#64793] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2003/02/14

Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#64804] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/14

On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:05:19AM +0900, Matt Armstrong wrote:

[#64811] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Dan Sugalski <dan@...> 2003/02/14

At 4:18 AM +0900 2/15/03, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#64626] Why does Array#compact! return the array, but uniq! return a count? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

11 messages 2003/02/13

[#64752] why html template systems never use new tags? — Tom Sawyer <transami@...>

curious, i've realized that i have never seen any html template systems that

16 messages 2003/02/14

[#64753] module This::Encompassing::That — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>

Today, I decided I was tired of

45 messages 2003/02/14
[#64754] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/14

Hi --

[#64757] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...> 2003/02/14

dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:

[#64850] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/15

On Friday, February 14, 2003, 2:00:56 PM, Bil wrote:

[#64859] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/15

Hi --

[#64883] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/15

On Sunday, February 16, 2003, 4:01:47 AM, dblack wrote:

[#64986] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#64987] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#64988] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#64990] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#65046] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#65078] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/18

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#65085] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65137] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/18

On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 11:56:41 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#65151] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65160] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — nobu.nokada@... 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65178] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65211] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — <nathaniel@...> 2003/02/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

[#65225] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65230] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/19

Hi --

[#65235] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#64785] Segmation fault in combination of heavy socket I/O and multi-threading — Idan Sofer <idan@...>

This is one bug(Or perhaps even a set of bugs) I ran into more then once

10 messages 2003/02/14
[#65118] Re: [BUG] Segmation fault in combination of heavy socket I/O and multi-threading — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/18

>>>>> "I" == Idan Sofer <idan@idanso.dyndns.org> writes:

[#65001] How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

I have an existing class Foo, and existing objects of that class.

42 messages 2003/02/17
[#65017] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#65081] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/18

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:46:59AM -0800, Bill Kelly wrote:

[#65084] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65110] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/18

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:52:12PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#65112] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65125] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/18

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:08:07AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#65179] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65196] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/19

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:19:15AM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#65201] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/19

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:02:21AM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#65090] $SAFE and creating New objects (File) — "\"RayZ\" Andrew V Rumm" <rayz@...>

Sorry for noob question

16 messages 2003/02/18

[#65141] String#+ operatorbroken? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

17 messages 2003/02/19

[#65159] Sourcing files — Bjn Lindstr <bkhl@...>

I like using source files as configuration files for my hacks.

13 messages 2003/02/19

[#65167] Ruby scripts for daily unix system administration — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets@...>

Hi, I'm a newbie looking for any example of writing ruby script to do my

22 messages 2003/02/19

[#65212] Rite Status? — Travis Whitton <whitton@...>

Hello all - I was just wondering if Rite is still in development and if it's

16 messages 2003/02/19

[#65270] optimization question — Travis Whitton <whitton@...>

Hello - A friend and I have been working on a Ruby implementation of a

39 messages 2003/02/19

[#65292] Curses base windowing system — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets@...>

As I have only limited resources on my laptop(memory, diskspace, and CPU

17 messages 2003/02/20

[#65331] Return Values of [] for Array, Hash,... (ruby 1.6.8) — Michael Bruschkewitz <brusch2@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2003/02/20

[#65351] proc {} vs. Method#to_proc — dblack@...

Hi --

22 messages 2003/02/20

[#65424] Regexp help: Parsing a CSV file — Tim Bates <tim@...>

I've dumped a CSV (comma separated values) file from Excel, and I want to

27 messages 2003/02/21

[#65454] xml-configfile 0.8.0 — Maik Schmidt <contact@...>

Yo!

14 messages 2003/02/21

[#65473] Style question: using 'block_given?' — Bill Dueber <wdueber@...>

I'm new to Ruby, and want to know what The Best Way To Do It is...

21 messages 2003/02/21
[#65485] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/21

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:00:44AM +0900, Bill Dueber wrote:

[#65494] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/21

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 06:05:23AM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#65498] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/21

> This is the class instance variable police. Freeze! Keine Bewegung!

[#65511] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — dblack@... 2003/02/22

Hi --

[#65514] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/22

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 04:05:59PM +0900, dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:

[#65526] embedded docs — Wojciech Kaczmarek <schatten@...>

Is ruby going to have (in a reasonably predictable future :) embedded

50 messages 2003/02/22
[#65567] Re: embedded docs — Simon Cozens <simon@...> 2003/02/23

Brian Wisti <brian@coolnamehere.com> writes:

[#65572] Re: embedded docs — Piers Harding <piers@...> 2003/02/23

[#65573] Re: embedded docs — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/23

I agree that this is very important.

[#65576] Internationalization (Re: embedded docs) — Brian Wisti <brian@...> 2003/02/23

On Sunday 23 February 2003 09:18 am, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:

[#65577] Re: Internationalization (Re: embedded docs) — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/23

On Sunday 23 February 2003 10:53 am, Brian Wisti wrote:

[#65601] ANN: REXML 2.5.7 and 2.4.7 — ser@... (Sean Russell)

Two, two, TWO releases for the price of one!

13 messages 2003/02/24

[#65619] Coding challenge: Space-separated constants — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I'm issuing this challenge because I'm

12 messages 2003/02/24

[#65632] Happy Birthday, Ruby, and an announcement.... — dblack@...

Dear everyone,

18 messages 2003/02/24

[#65644] Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>

All,

26 messages 2003/02/24
[#65779] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65784] Re: Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/26

It is working now with line numbers. What is the syntax for breaking at a

[#65786] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65790] Re: Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/26

It may, I'll try it, but it really doesn't do much good even if it does work.

[#65791] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65660] Objectify the mersenne twister in 1.8? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

17 messages 2003/02/24

[#65802] Ruby in Performance Testing — E F van de Laar <emiel@...>

Rubyists,

18 messages 2003/02/26

[#65835] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +0900, <jbritt@ruby-doc.org> <jbritt@ruby-doc.org> pisze:

12 messages 2003/02/26

[#65854] Ruby Compile-time optimization — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

52 messages 2003/02/27

[#65884] Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>

I have not been able to change the behavior of IO::read() to non-blocking.

27 messages 2003/02/27
[#65920] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — nobu.nokada@... 2003/02/27

Hi,

[#65937] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/27

This is with 1.8 CVS head on linux kernel 2.4.20.

[#66126] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — nobu.nokada@... 2003/03/02

Hi,

[#66146] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/03/02

I guess I must be missing something, but I see nothing here that would expose

[#66149] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/03/02

Hi,

[#65907] XmlConfigFile usage — Ollivier Robert <roberto@...>

Hello,

31 messages 2003/02/27
[#65943] Re: XmlConfigFile usage — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...> 2003/02/27

> I underestimated the need for true XML serialization and I think it's

[#65945] Re: XmlConfigFile usage — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/27

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:53:47AM +0900, Chris Morris wrote:

[#65991] I'm stuck — Friedrich Dominicus <frido@...>

Well my problem sounds IMHO trivial.

31 messages 2003/02/28

source jewel发源地宝

From: 339@...
Date: 2003-02-25 04:43:22 UTC
List: ruby-talk #65710
将尖/寡杭何:
    窟坿仇右墳佩畠悶揖畔鴻寄帷右遍蔑匍順涛嗔維定
    孝廝艇剪定寄窟嵐並泌吭
俶勣篠劔医栖厘佩協崙右墳 議遍蔑巷望萩廣吭
窟坿仇右墳叫欷一並侃噐2003定2埖9晩屎塀濡崛仟促
叫欷海芦將鰐廉砿尖曝慎赤促B恙遍蚊
凪麿選狼圭隈厚個葎
右墳紗垢勺鯉 廨喘徂儂窮三0769-5326007
覚俊鎭墳、邦唱、横詮匡汽勧寔0769-5374899
忽翌人斌廨0769-7185550
窮徨喨周339@vip.sina.com
      賜宀dg13537114473@263.net 
利    嫋http://www.8ud.cn.gs 
返字式扮匍暦13038881919叫欷軸震烏勺惹戻工窒継劔医捲暦
垢皆一窮三/勧寔0774-3863176
垢皆仇峽鴻廉類巒偏垢皆匯揃湘霜戦18催1.2.3蚊
厘断仟制割阻匯倖自瞳鎭墳概寂匯倖科弼唱嵎横詮概寂
廨匍、酔堀紗垢自瞳弌易鎭墳、科弼鎭墳、科弼邦唱、科弼横詮。
惹唔凪麿繁垢右墳議栖劔紗垢匍暦音冲弼、侘彜散哭旨綱
右墳烏勺燕窒継姥沫昧扮孝昨栖窮沫函勧寔
噴蛍散哭酷巷望委艇勣協杭議右墳窃歯汽勧寔崛5374899
厘断野亟烏勺朔瀧貧指勧公艇參工歌深。
厘断適薦葎艇戻工匍順冥久勺鯉。
穫屬光仇偏雫右墳答窟将斌。
総翌厘貫嗤叱倖貧認嵐議翌斌寄汽箔嗤序笥字匂議右墳皆栽恬。
    斌踞                 
                         窟坿仇右墳 叫欷一 塑崘高 
                         2003-2
English introduction
Dear of jewelry commerce friend:
This is GuangXi source jewel the company, How are you?
( Mainland China) registration:4504033004279
Product introduction:The finished product of the every kind of jewel
Production scale:Unite the production's factory, and totally have 1500 workers, equipments, biggest yield of the world that import.
Main of product is:Supply:
( the diamond's craft) transparent cubic zirconia of white,
Size:1.00 mm ゛ 150.00 mm
Shape:Arbitrarily of shape, invite you to make to order
( the diamond's craft) the color's cubic zirconia,
Size:1.00 mm ゛ 150 mm
Color:Arbitrarily of color, our warehouse the long-term keep to have the raw material of the cubic zirconia of 50 kinds of colors, and make to order the jewel of the every kind of shape
( diamond craft) the color glass of the crystal class,
Size:3.00 mm ゛ 120 mm
Color:150 kinds of colors, wes provide the kind plank, and make to order to imitate the true jewel
Red corundum, blue corundum, blue spinel, emerald, etc.
Size:1.00 mm ゛ 15 mm
Color:20 jewel for passing the natural crystallize becomings, wes provide the kind plank, and can make to order the upscale jewel of the every kind of shape
Moreover, China is the most fine to process the craft:
The quantity is special good of the white cubic zirconia of tallest Class,
Baby size:1.00 mm ゛ 7.00 mm,
QC Class:AAAAA  
External appearance:The beautiful ray of light of the natural diamond
Factory address:
No.18,JiuLong street , the 1st of factory road, WuZhou, GuangXi, China
The factory's TEL and FAX:0086-0774-3863176
Business enterprise mailbox:
Mailbox of Chinese WuZhou City postal service No.1( postal service coding:543002)
Chinese office in DongGuan City:
First floor, KangLe mansion B, LongWei road, Chang-an town,DongGuan City, Guangdong province, China
The Manager:ZhiGuang Liang
Cellular phone:13038881919
TEL:0086-0769-5326007  
FAX:0086-0769-5374899(24 hours)
Website:http://www.8ud.cn.gs
The business's Email:339@vip.sina.com 
Emergency Email:dg13537114473@263.net 

In This Thread

Prev Next