From: Michael Shigorin <mike@...>
Date: 2003-02-27T23:32:00+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] RMagick 1.0.0 now available

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:19:46PM +0900, Tim Hunter wrote:
> >So that "clown = clown.raise" would be just "clown.raise!"?
[skip]
> OTOH, bang versions are probably not justified for some
> methods. (Does RMagick really need an adaptive_threshold!
> method?) This leaves a whole bunch that _might_ be useful to
> add - raise! and border! come to mind.
> 
> In the end which bang methods get added is mostly going to be
> decided by user input. Which ones do you think would be useful?

The ones that seem to yield image modified in a "flow-thru" way,
so that original data will more likely be abandoned.

That's crap explanation on my side, of course :-) -- but I just
start using Ruby for daily jobs and last applications of
ImageMagick during last days were stupid shell scripts.

Want to approah it better though.

PS: yes, I didn't answer :(

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@altlinux.ru>
  ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/