From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-02-14T11:42:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Lexical scope and closures

Hi,

In message "Re: Lexical scope and closures"
    on 03/02/14, Tom Sawyer <transami@transami.net> writes:

|i understand, but perhaps too bad, as i think it might be the easiest way to 
|satisfy both camps.

Which camps?  At least this one does not satisfy the "compatibility
camp", which must be the biggest.  Could you describe other camps
satisfied by this proposal?

							matz.