From: "Hal E. Fulton" Date: 2003-02-07T06:14:55+09:00 Subject: Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Tomson" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby To: "ruby-talk ML" Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... > In article , > Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote: > >On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Kilmer wrote: > > > >> > >> On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 04:24 AM, Holden Glova wrote: > >> > > [...] > >> >> bit at SVG. So would it be possible to create SVG-based GUIs that > > [...] > >> >> Phil > >> > > >> > Hiya Phil, > >> > > >> > AFAIK, for an SVG gui to be useful it would need to handle events. > > [...] > >> > >> Phil et al, > >> > >> I agree with your assessment that it would be a killer Ruby application > >> to be able to create browser delivered interfaces using a vector based > >> renderer (rather than HTML). For the reasons outlined above I don't > >> think that SVG is up to it...but Macromedia Flash _IS_ up to it. So, > > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG12/#xml-integration > >suggests that forms and widgets are on the agenda for SVG, as are > >events. Is Flash an open standard? > > No. And I know that folks on the Linux side of things tend to hate Flash > and therefore avoid it. I have mixed feelings. It may not be an open standard, but it's widespread and so on. It's in the same league IMO with PDF and Postscript and (to a lesser extent) RTF. Besides the fact it's not open, is there any other reason Linux people hate Flash? My friend hates it, but he hates *LOTS* of things. :) Hal