[#63439] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> >>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

22 messages 2003/02/01
[#63482] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63485] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:30:12AM +0100, ts wrote:

[#63486] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63491] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

> Y> I'm afraid I won't give you a way to turn it off. It is "quite

[#63492] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63495] Re: Local variables & blocks — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:36:52PM +0100, ts wrote:

[#63496] Re: Local variables & blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/02

>>>>> "B" == Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> writes:

[#63479] no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...>

is there any way to specifiy that a method can not be overrided? perfereably

20 messages 2003/02/02
[#63483] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:51:08PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:

[#63487] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 06:41:45PM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63500] Re: no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/02

On Sunday 02 February 2003 03:34 am, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63517] Re: no override — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/02

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:35:26PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:

[#63527] Re: no override — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/02

On Sunday 02 February 2003 09:01 am, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#63553] What is the best Ruby IDE you think? — Nicolay Vasiliev <n.vasiliev@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2003/02/03

[#63600] ruby-dev summary 19437-19455 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2003/02/03

[#63751] Embedding Ruby in C code — Szymon Drejewicz <drejewic@...>

How to compile this file:

24 messages 2003/02/05

[#63782] Error in Complex — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

18 messages 2003/02/05

[#63829] locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

Hold on, this post takes a few twists and turns. Consider it an exercise

41 messages 2003/02/06
[#63832] Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2003/02/06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#63859] Re: locana, SVG, cross-platform GUI meanderings... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2003/02/06

[#63862] Blogging software — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

Anyone done any work on a ruby-powered weblog?

15 messages 2003/02/06

[#63906] The way of the Gentoo — "MikkelFJ" <mikkelfj-anti-spam@...>

22 messages 2003/02/06

[#63938] Private lvalue methods unusable? — Steven Smolinski <steven.smolinski@...>

I'm learning Ruby, and trying to grasp the non-declarative concept with

14 messages 2003/02/06

[#64018] easy access for CGI query — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...>

hello,

14 messages 2003/02/07

[#64063] Tortured by the Dependency Daemons — Jonathan Smith <jonathan.w.smith@...>

The instructions for installation state, "In RWiki package for your

16 messages 2003/02/08

[#64068] Relative performance of Ruby templating systems — "Gabriel Emerson" <egabriel@...>

I decided to run Siege against Mod Ruby, ERuby, Amrita, PageTemplate,

11 messages 2003/02/08

[#64146] ruby-dev summary 19457-19539 — Kazuo Saito <ksaito@...>

10 messages 2003/02/09
[#64151] Operator reordering, good idea? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 19457-19539) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2003/02/09

Hi, I'm just a beginner buy program, but...

[#64164] Trapping Access/Modification of Objects — Jason Voegele <jason@...>

After a long delay, I'm now starting to work on the RubyGOODS library

13 messages 2003/02/09

[#64242] Source code for "Ruby Developer's Guide" — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>

Hi People,

15 messages 2003/02/10

[#64247] turning modules into classes — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

Did you ever want to instantiate a module?

28 messages 2003/02/10
[#64251] Re: turning modules into classes — dblack@... 2003/02/10

Hi --

[#64278] inheriting from base classes — dblack@...

Hi --

37 messages 2003/02/11

[#64329] Range#length? — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

What happened to Range#length and Range#size?

39 messages 2003/02/11

[#64392] String frustration — "Tim Kynerd" <tim@...>

Hi everyone,

23 messages 2003/02/11

[#64421] Name for #=== based assertion — <nathaniel@...>

I've had several requests that an assertion based on #=== be added to

16 messages 2003/02/12

[#64470] Need regex help (or bug in match) — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

17 messages 2003/02/12
[#64471] Re: Need regex help (or bug in match) — dblack@... 2003/02/12

Hi --

[#64549] Re: Can we attack the 'not enough libraries' thing straight on? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/02/12

----- Original Message -----

[#64524] mod_ruby insecury op — Daniel Bretoi <lists@...>

[Wed Feb 12 12:00:16 2003] [error] mod_ruby: error in ruby

15 messages 2003/02/12

[#64527] Windows support — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2003/02/12

[#64528] hm,... arr[1]["name"] — "daniel" <offstuff@...>

$arr = Array();

16 messages 2003/02/12

[#64575] Re: Lexical scope and closures — patrickdlogan@...

> (3) some other syntax will be introduced for cases where...

53 messages 2003/02/12
[#64647] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +0900, patrickdlogan@attbi.com wrote:

[#64670] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:44:36PM +0900, Mauricio Fern?ndez wrote:

[#64678] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/13

On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:54 am, Brian Candler wrote:

[#64750] Re: Lexical scope and closures — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/14

Hi,

[#64751] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/14

On Thursday 13 February 2003 06:44 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#64755] Re: Lexical scope and closures — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/14

Hi,

[#64756] Re: Lexical scope and closures — Tom Sawyer <transami@...> 2003/02/14

On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:42 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#64855] Re: Lexical scope and closures — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...> 2003/02/15

Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:06:31 +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> pisze:

[#64920] Re: Lexical scope and closures — dblack@... 2003/02/16

Hi --

[#64602] von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — <jbritt@...>

Since this is something of a permathread on this list I though this would be of interest:

33 messages 2003/02/13
[#64606] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/02/13

On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +0900

[#64778] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...> 2003/02/14

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:15:42 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> pisze:

[#64789] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/14

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:27:10PM +0900, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:

[#64793] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2003/02/14

Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#64804] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/14

On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:05:19AM +0900, Matt Armstrong wrote:

[#64811] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — Dan Sugalski <dan@...> 2003/02/14

At 4:18 AM +0900 2/15/03, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#64626] Why does Array#compact! return the array, but uniq! return a count? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

11 messages 2003/02/13

[#64752] why html template systems never use new tags? — Tom Sawyer <transami@...>

curious, i've realized that i have never seen any html template systems that

16 messages 2003/02/14

[#64753] module This::Encompassing::That — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>

Today, I decided I was tired of

45 messages 2003/02/14
[#64754] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/14

Hi --

[#64757] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...> 2003/02/14

dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:

[#64850] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/15

On Friday, February 14, 2003, 2:00:56 PM, Bil wrote:

[#64859] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/15

Hi --

[#64883] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/15

On Sunday, February 16, 2003, 4:01:47 AM, dblack wrote:

[#64986] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#64987] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#64988] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#64990] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#65046] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#65078] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/18

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#65085] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65137] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/02/18

On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 11:56:41 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#65151] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65160] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — nobu.nokada@... 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65178] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65211] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — <nathaniel@...> 2003/02/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

[#65225] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65230] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — dblack@... 2003/02/19

Hi --

[#65235] Re: module This::Encompassing::That — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#64785] Segmation fault in combination of heavy socket I/O and multi-threading — Idan Sofer <idan@...>

This is one bug(Or perhaps even a set of bugs) I ran into more then once

10 messages 2003/02/14
[#65118] Re: [BUG] Segmation fault in combination of heavy socket I/O and multi-threading — ts <decoux@...> 2003/02/18

>>>>> "I" == Idan Sofer <idan@idanso.dyndns.org> writes:

[#65001] How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

I have an existing class Foo, and existing objects of that class.

42 messages 2003/02/17
[#65017] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2003/02/17

Hi,

[#65081] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/18

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:46:59AM -0800, Bill Kelly wrote:

[#65084] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65110] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/18

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:52:12PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#65112] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/18

Hi,

[#65125] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/18

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:08:07AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#65179] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/02/19

Hi,

[#65196] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/19

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:19:15AM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#65201] Re: How to test for existence of instance variable? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/02/19

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:02:21AM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#65090] $SAFE and creating New objects (File) — "\"RayZ\" Andrew V Rumm" <rayz@...>

Sorry for noob question

16 messages 2003/02/18

[#65141] String#+ operatorbroken? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

17 messages 2003/02/19

[#65159] Sourcing files — Bjn Lindstr <bkhl@...>

I like using source files as configuration files for my hacks.

13 messages 2003/02/19

[#65167] Ruby scripts for daily unix system administration — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets@...>

Hi, I'm a newbie looking for any example of writing ruby script to do my

22 messages 2003/02/19

[#65212] Rite Status? — Travis Whitton <whitton@...>

Hello all - I was just wondering if Rite is still in development and if it's

16 messages 2003/02/19

[#65270] optimization question — Travis Whitton <whitton@...>

Hello - A friend and I have been working on a Ruby implementation of a

39 messages 2003/02/19

[#65292] Curses base windowing system — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets@...>

As I have only limited resources on my laptop(memory, diskspace, and CPU

17 messages 2003/02/20

[#65331] Return Values of [] for Array, Hash,... (ruby 1.6.8) — Michael Bruschkewitz <brusch2@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2003/02/20

[#65351] proc {} vs. Method#to_proc — dblack@...

Hi --

22 messages 2003/02/20

[#65424] Regexp help: Parsing a CSV file — Tim Bates <tim@...>

I've dumped a CSV (comma separated values) file from Excel, and I want to

27 messages 2003/02/21

[#65454] xml-configfile 0.8.0 — Maik Schmidt <contact@...>

Yo!

14 messages 2003/02/21

[#65473] Style question: using 'block_given?' — Bill Dueber <wdueber@...>

I'm new to Ruby, and want to know what The Best Way To Do It is...

21 messages 2003/02/21
[#65485] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/21

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:00:44AM +0900, Bill Dueber wrote:

[#65494] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/02/21

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 06:05:23AM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#65498] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/21

> This is the class instance variable police. Freeze! Keine Bewegung!

[#65511] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — dblack@... 2003/02/22

Hi --

[#65514] Re: Style question: using 'block_given?' — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/22

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 04:05:59PM +0900, dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:

[#65526] embedded docs — Wojciech Kaczmarek <schatten@...>

Is ruby going to have (in a reasonably predictable future :) embedded

50 messages 2003/02/22
[#65567] Re: embedded docs — Simon Cozens <simon@...> 2003/02/23

Brian Wisti <brian@coolnamehere.com> writes:

[#65572] Re: embedded docs — Piers Harding <piers@...> 2003/02/23

[#65573] Re: embedded docs — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/23

I agree that this is very important.

[#65576] Internationalization (Re: embedded docs) — Brian Wisti <brian@...> 2003/02/23

On Sunday 23 February 2003 09:18 am, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:

[#65577] Re: Internationalization (Re: embedded docs) — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/23

On Sunday 23 February 2003 10:53 am, Brian Wisti wrote:

[#65601] ANN: REXML 2.5.7 and 2.4.7 — ser@... (Sean Russell)

Two, two, TWO releases for the price of one!

13 messages 2003/02/24

[#65619] Coding challenge: Space-separated constants — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I'm issuing this challenge because I'm

12 messages 2003/02/24

[#65632] Happy Birthday, Ruby, and an announcement.... — dblack@...

Dear everyone,

18 messages 2003/02/24

[#65644] Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>

All,

26 messages 2003/02/24
[#65779] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65784] Re: Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/26

It is working now with line numbers. What is the syntax for breaking at a

[#65786] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65790] Re: Debugger Not Working — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/26

It may, I'll try it, but it really doesn't do much good even if it does work.

[#65791] Re: Debugger Not Working — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/02/26

Hi, Seth,

[#65660] Objectify the mersenne twister in 1.8? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

17 messages 2003/02/24

[#65802] Ruby in Performance Testing — E F van de Laar <emiel@...>

Rubyists,

18 messages 2003/02/26

[#65835] Re: von Rossum on Strong vs. Weak Typing — "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@...>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +0900, <jbritt@ruby-doc.org> <jbritt@ruby-doc.org> pisze:

12 messages 2003/02/26

[#65854] Ruby Compile-time optimization — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

52 messages 2003/02/27

[#65884] Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>

I have not been able to change the behavior of IO::read() to non-blocking.

27 messages 2003/02/27
[#65920] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — nobu.nokada@... 2003/02/27

Hi,

[#65937] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/02/27

This is with 1.8 CVS head on linux kernel 2.4.20.

[#66126] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — nobu.nokada@... 2003/03/02

Hi,

[#66146] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...> 2003/03/02

I guess I must be missing something, but I see nothing here that would expose

[#66149] Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/03/02

Hi,

[#65907] XmlConfigFile usage — Ollivier Robert <roberto@...>

Hello,

31 messages 2003/02/27
[#65943] Re: XmlConfigFile usage — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...> 2003/02/27

> I underestimated the need for true XML serialization and I think it's

[#65945] Re: XmlConfigFile usage — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/02/27

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:53:47AM +0900, Chris Morris wrote:

[#65991] I'm stuck — Friedrich Dominicus <frido@...>

Well my problem sounds IMHO trivial.

31 messages 2003/02/28

IMPORT REQUEST.

From: SANNI AHMED <SANNIAHMED@...>
Date: 2003-02-06 20:21:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #63905
DR.SANNI AHMED
PLOT 1121
ADETOKUNBO ADEMOLA STREET
VICTORIA ISLAND-LAGOS
NIGERIA


 
Dear Sir,
 
RE: BUSINESS PROPOSAL - STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.

I am  DR.SANNI AHMED., Chairman to the Contract Review Panel that was recently 
inaugurated by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to review the 
activities of past military government with particular reference to contracts 
awarded by all ministries between 1990 to 1999. In the course of carrying out our 
assigned duties, we discovered the sum of USD40.5 (forty million, five hundred 
thousand dollars) only lying idle in a suspense account with our apex bank. This 
funds emanated from grossly over-invoiced contracts awarded to conglomerate 
of foreign firms by the Petroleum Ministry on behalf of the Nigerian National 
Petroleum Corporation. On completion of our assignment, this amount was 
deliberately not included in our report because we want to capitalize on this once 
in a lifetime opportunity to benefit and make a fortune out of it. The only option we 
have to achieve our aims and objective is to have this fund transferred to a 
country of our choice where it can be kept in trust and safe custody for us. We 
are however handicapped at the moment by our status as civil servants, which 
barred us from operating foreign accounts while still in government service.
 
Thus, through some discreet inquiries from our Chambers of  Commerce, you and 
your organization were revealed as being quite astute in private entrepreneurship. 
On this premise, we have no doubt in your ability to handle a business of this 
nature, which informed our desire and  wish to enter into a partnership with you. 
This business involves the remittance of this amount into your bank account with 
the hope of travelling down to meet you physically in order to receive our share. 
We hope to invest some in profitable ventures in your country based on your 
advise while the balance will be repatriated home as foreign earnings. We have 
mapped out strategies and all paperwork is in place to ensure a 100% success.
 
The nature of your business at present does not really matter because in the 
world over, bigger firms do bid for big contracts especially in third world countries 
like ours and can subcontract part of it to other firms for execution. That is you or 
your firm will be regarded as one of those that executed one of such projects and 
therefore entitled to receive the over-invoiced amount of the contract value since 
the original contractor has been paid. Be rest assured that this transaction is 
100% risk free as there is actually no risk is involved either now or in the future 
for we are well connected in official circle. Given our level of commitment at the 
moment, we want to assure you that with full dedication on your part, the 
objective of having this fund remitted would have been realized within a period of 
two weeks. It is hereby expressly agreed in principle that at the end of the 
transaction, you will be entitled to 25% of the entire sum, 74% will be for my 
colleagues and I while 1% has been earmarked to take care of any expenses that 
might arise in the course of this transaction.
 
If you are interested in this proposal, please call or send me an  e-mail with 
via:sanniahmed@ecplaza.net  for more clarifications. If however you are not 
interested, still let me know to enable me search for someone else to carry out this 
business with.
 
I anticpate a timely response from you.
 
Thanks.
 
Yours Sincerely,
 
DR.SANNI AHMED

DR.S.AHMED

In This Thread

Prev Next