From: Robert Hahn <rhahn@...>
Date: 2003-02-12T03:23:57+09:00
Subject: Re: Range#length?

I suggest Range#endpoint.

-rh


On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Range#length?"
>     on 03/02/12, "Chris Pine" <nemo@hellotree.com> writes:
>
> |Well, it's a shame that something wasn't put in to refer to the last 
> actual
> |element in the range.  That's actually all I want.  As I said, #end, 
> #last,
> |and #max all return `99' for both 3..99 and 3...99.
> |
> |Oh, well.  Nothing a good ``last - (exclude_end? ? 1 : 0)'' can't 
> handle.
>
> Do you think of a good name for it?  I'm glad to add a method if
> you have a good name.
>
> 							matz.
>
>
---
Robert Hahn,
Senior Web Developer,
Quarry Integrated Communications