Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket

matz,

You won't see the blocking behavior unless you are actually talking across the 
net.  It works fine on the same machine, but that isn't terribly helpful.

My test case is talking to a machine over the internet; I'm testing to see if 
this is necessary to see the behavior.

On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:16 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Unable to do non-blocking read on socket"
>
>     on 03/03/03, Seth Kurtzberg <[e-mail]> writes:
> |>  (a) IO#read (without size) returns all available data on the IO.
> |>      It doesn't block if O_NONBLOCK is set.  I was wrong in
> |>      [ruby-talk:66149].
> |
> |Not what I would like to see but not what I was trying to use.
>
> Could you describe "what you'd like to see"?  I'm having (sort of)
> hard time to understand you.
>
> By the way, it somewhat different from the documentation:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------- IO#read
>      ios.read( [anInteger] ) -> aString or nil
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      Reads at most anInteger bytes from the I/O stream, or to the end of
>      file if anInteger is omitted. Returns nil if called at end of file.
>         f = File.new("testfile")
>         f.read(16)   #=> "This is line one"
>
> what do you guys think about this behavior.  Should it be fixed as
> the document says, or should we update the document?
>
> |>  (b) IO#read (with maximum size) raise an EWOULDBLOCK exception if the
> |>      buffer is empty.  It returns the buffer contents if the buffer is
> |>      partially filled before EWOULDBLOCK.
> |
> |It never returns EWOULDBLOCK.  Unless the buffer is empty at the time of
> | the call, it blocks until the maximum number of bytes (as specified by
> | the parameter) is received.
> |
> |So, both variations block, and NONBLOCK behavior is not available with
> | either.
>
> ?
>
> On my machine, ruby 1.8.0 (2003-02-28) [i686-linux], (a) doesn't
> block, since it returns as much as data available without blocking if
> O_NONBLOCK is set.  And (b) doesn't block neither, since it either
> raises the exception, or returns data available on the buffer.
>
> (a) is proved by Nobu's example [ruby-talk:66126].
>
> (b) can be proved by replacing the line in the example
>
>   p s.nonblock {sleep WAIT; s.read}
>
> by
>
>   s.nonblock {sleep WAIT; p s.read(40); p s.read(40)}
>
> and try
>
>   % ruby client.rb foo 2
>
> you'll get
>
>   "hello,"
>   /tmp/client.rb:8:in `read': Resource temporarily unavailable - "/tmp/foo"
> (Errno::EWOULDBLOCK) from /tmp/client.rb:8
>           from /tmp/client.rb:8:in `nonblock'
>           from /tmp/client.rb:8
>
> 							matz.

-- 
Seth Kurtzberg
M. I. S. Corp.
480-661-1849
[e-mail]