From: Tobias Peters <tpeters@...>
Date: 2003-02-05T07:05:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Native rational and complex number implementations?

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> > because it's tedious to write
> > Complex(2,3) if what you want is 2+3i
> 
> True, but how many literals do you really define?  Numbers tend to be
> kept internal to algorithms.

Several hundreds to a few thousands, I guess ;-)

Ok, that source code was machine generated. It's unit tests that check 
whether parts of a C++ module wrapped with swig generate the same output 
for a given test input as older Matlab code.

Machine generated, but still ugly to look at when scrolling through the 
file to add more tests.

  T