From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-02-12T03:07:55+09:00
Subject: Re: Trapping Access/Modification of Objects

Hi,

In message "Re: Trapping Access/Modification of Objects"
    on 03/02/12, Chad Fowler <chadfowler@chadfowler.com> writes:

|>|By this do you mean that the RCR should
|>|
|>|1) Fit in well with the existing hooking framework, or
|>|2) Specify a new hooking framework to replace what exists, or
|>|3) Specify additional hooks in addition to the hooks that already exist, or
|>|4) Something else that perhaps I didn't understand.
|>
|>Either 2 or 3; I prefer 2 if possible.

|What about adding aspects, possibly evolving from AspectR, out-of-the-box?

I like aspects, but I prefer CLOS-like method combination.  I wish I
could add some kind of method combination (before, after, around to
name some) to Ruby in the future.

By the way, bundling AspectR to the distribution sounds nice anyway.
I wonder how Robert Feldt (and Avi) feel.

							matz.