From: Robert Klemme <bob.news@...>
Date: 2003-02-17T18:04:30+09:00
Subject: Re: Lexical scope and closures


<nobu.nokada@softhome.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:200302141518.h1EFI0804442@sharui.nakada.kanuma.tochigi.jp...
> Hi,
>
> At Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:32:11 +0900,
> Robert Klemme wrote:
> > > > > I'd choose something between
> > > > >
> > > > >   arr.each {|i|
> > > > >     local{|a,b|
> > > > >       c = ..
> > > > >       ...
> > > > >     }
> > > > >   }
> > > (snip)
> > > > > in either case, a, b are local, c is method-wise variable.
> > > >
> > > > I vote for the second variant, possibly replacing 'let' with
'local'. The
> > > > drawback of the first variant is IMHO that it is too easily
recognized as
> > > > an ordinary block.
> > >
> > > Because it is an ordinary block.
> >
> > ?  Why would you then need a 'local' keyword at all?
>
> def local; yield; end

Err, sorry, I don't get what you mean.  Could you please write another
explaining sentence?  Thanks a lot!

Regards

    robert