[#13842] Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding. — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

The below is a little long. So here's a summary.

11 messages 2007/12/01

[#13851] Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear — "Voroztsov Artem" <artem.voroztsov@...>

I encountered problem with Array#flatten slowness (it can be much

19 messages 2007/12/03
[#13863] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/12/03

Voroztsov Artem wrote:

[#13867] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear — "Voroztsov Artem" <artem.voroztsov@...> 2007/12/03

2007/12/3, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com>:

[#13868] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear — "Voroztsov Artem" <artem.voroztsov@...> 2007/12/03

2007/12/3, Voroztsov Artem <artem.voroztsov@gmail.com>:

[#13870] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2007/12/03

Hi,

[#13903] Clarification of retry change — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Matz confirmed that retry-outside-rescue will no longer work, but I

14 messages 2007/12/07
[#13905] Re: Clarification of retry change — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/12/07

Hi,

[#13908] What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>

20 messages 2007/12/07
[#13913] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/12/07

Hi,

[#13914] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2007/12/07

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#13926] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/12/07

T24gRGVjIDcsIDIwMDcgODoyMSBBTSwgR29uemFsbyBHYXJyYW11w7FvIDxnZ2FycmFAYWR2YW5j

[#14038] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — "Joe Swatosh" <joe.swatosh@...> 2007/12/12

Hi Luis

[#14039] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/12/12

On Dec 12, 2007 4:05 PM, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14040] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/12/12

> This was discussed in other thread in ruby-talk, but just to summarize:

[#13969] redefineable not operator — David Flanagan <david@...>

Matz,

37 messages 2007/12/10
[#13971] Re: redefineable not operator — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/12/10

David Flanagan wrote:

[#13972] Re: redefineable not operator — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/12/10

Hi,

[#14007] Re: redefineable not operator — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/12/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14011] Re: redefineable not operator — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/12/11

Hi,

[#14013] Re: redefineable not operator — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/12/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14016] Re: redefineable not operator — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/12/12

murphy wrote:

[#14019] Re: redefineable not operator — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/12/12

Hi,

[#14024] Re: redefineable not operator — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2007/12/12

[#14029] Re: redefineable not operator — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/12/12

[#14042] Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

E2MM.Raise complains about $! being read-only now, and E2MM is used by

22 messages 2007/12/13
[#14043] Re: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/12/13

[#14049] RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/12/13

On Dec 12, 2007, at 16:19 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14052] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/12/13

[#14056] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/12/13

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14123] Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up — David Flanagan <david@...>

Matz,

20 messages 2007/12/17
[#14220] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/12/21

Hi,

[#14238] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/12/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14147] named captures assigning to local variables — David Flanagan <david@...>

I've just been browsing ruby-dev. For an english speaker, it is kind of

26 messages 2007/12/19
[#14150] Re: named captures assigning to local variables — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/12/19

In article <47686B87.7050609@davidflanagan.com>,

[#14158] Re: named captures assigning to local variables — david@... 2007/12/19

Thank you for the clarification, akr. I'm embarassed to say that it didn't

[#14161] Re: named captures assigning to local variables — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/12/20

If I may, have a proposal. My apologies if this has already been

[#14170] Re: named captures assigning to local variables — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/12/20

In article <476A087E.3070000@davidflanagan.com>,

[#14172] Re: named captures assigning to local variables — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/12/20

How about making the return value an array of the captured strings, or nil

[#14149] Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Brent Roman <brent@...>

The attached patch against Ruby 1.8.6-p110 improves the performance of

38 messages 2007/12/19
[#14202] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/12/21

Brent Roman wrote:

[#14257] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2007/12/22

[#14266] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/12/22

Brent Roman wrote:

[#14274] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/12/22

On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:25PM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#14186] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>

Just a heads up here. I've added Rake (version 0.8.0 ... the latest)

34 messages 2007/12/21
[#14210] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2007/12/21

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#14213] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/12/21

On Dec 21, 2007 10:24 AM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wr=

[#14215] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2007/12/21

[#14303] IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

While working on Chapter 05 and referencing various works

23 messages 2007/12/23
[#14308] Re: IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/12/23

[#14335] Many external symbols _without_ prefix in libruby object file — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp>

Hi all,

12 messages 2007/12/23

[#14364] RDoc: [FATAL] failed to allocate memory — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>

With revision 14590, I suddenly get an error when I do "make install"

13 messages 2007/12/24

[#14367] replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2007/12/24
[#14390] Re: replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb — James Gray <james@...> 2007/12/24

On Dec 24, 2007, at 3:34 AM, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#14418] Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0 — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

Just re-built latest svn of 1.9.0 and base64.rb is removed. Its

51 messages 2007/12/25
[#14420] Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/12/25

On Dec 25, 2007, at 07:03 AM, Richard Kilmer wrote:

[#14427] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/12/25

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#14431] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/12/25

[#14446] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/12/26

On Dec 25, 2007, at 13:35 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14452] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/12/26

[#14492] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/12/27

On Dec 26, 2007, at 06:16 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14494] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/12/27

[#14503] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2007/12/27

[#14505] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/12/27

Richard Kilmer wrote:

[#14429] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — hemant <gethemant@...> 2007/12/25

On Dec 26, 2007 1:01 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:

[#14430] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0) — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/12/25

hemant wrote:

[#14517] Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2007/12/27

[#14549] multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0 — khaines@...

Like everyone else, I've been testing my stuff under 1.9.0. In general,

38 messages 2007/12/28
[#14560] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0 — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2007/12/28

[#14573] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0 — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/12/29

Brent Roman wrote:

[#14603] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0 — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2007/12/30

[#14617] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/12/31

In article <14544702.post@talk.nabble.com>,

[#14568] Layout of includes in ruby 1.9 — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>

19 messages 2007/12/29
[#14576] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/12/29

On Dec 29, 2007 2:39 AM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wro=

[#14569] Wide strings to ruby strings — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>

11 messages 2007/12/29

[#14602] RCR allow indexing last n items — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Hello

15 messages 2007/12/30
[#14609] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/12/30

Hi --

[#14610] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/12/30

On 30/12/2007, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#14616] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/12/30

Hi --

[#14621] Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...>

Hello!

21 messages 2007/12/31
[#14622] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — "Cheah Chu Yeow" <chuyeow@...> 2007/12/31

This looks like a related bug with passing block arguments to

[#14633] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/12/31

Cheah Chu Yeow wrote:

[#14716] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/01/03

Hi,

[#14726] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/03

>>>>> "S" == SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> writes:

[#14728] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/01/03

Hi,

[#16093] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...> 2008/04/01

Hi,

Re: Odd situation with mingw, readline and readline tests.

From: "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Date: 2007-12-26 15:18:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #14456
On Dec 26, 2007 12:27 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2007 12:19 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > I suspect readline doesn't consider it can run with redirected.
> >
>
> Thank you for your answer Nobu, I'm looking into this right now and it
> seems the "official" build of readline and the source code is broken.
>
> I've compared results against the 'jarp' build of readline (4.3) and it worked:
>
> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/
>

Ok, more deep information of the scenario:

Readline 5.0 binaries from gnuwin32: eat CPU and hang on the same line.

Readline 4.3 binaries from gnuwin32: same results as above

Jarp mingw build (4.3-2): crashes

Manual build of readline-4.3-2-src.zip code: segfault:

d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:20: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-25 revision 14709) [i386-mingw32]

-- control frame ----------
c:0034 p:---- s:0122 b:0122 l:000121 d:000121 CFUNC  :readline
c:0033 p:0017 s:0117 b:0117 l:000878 d:000116 BLOCK
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:20
c:0032 p:0111 s:0116 b:0116 l:000904 d:000115 BLOCK
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:74
c:0031 p:---- s:0114 b:0114 l:000113 d:000113 FINISH :initialize
c:0030 p:---- s:0112 b:0112 l:000111 d:000111 CFUNC  :open_uri_original_open
c:0029 p:0097 s:0107 b:0107 l:000106 d:000106 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/open-uri.rb:35
c:0028 p:0012 s:0100 b:0100 l:000904 d:0007f4 BLOCK
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:66
c:0027 p:---- s:0100 b:0100 l:000099 d:000099 FINISH :initialize
c:0026 p:---- s:0098 b:0098 l:000097 d:000097 CFUNC  :open_uri_original_open
c:0025 p:0097 s:0093 b:0093 l:000092 d:000092 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/open-uri.rb:35
c:0024 p:0011 s:0086 b:0086 l:000904 d:000904 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:65
c:0023 p:0086 s:0081 b:0081 l:000878 d:000878 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:19
c:0022 p:0039 s:0075 b:0075 l:000074 d:000074 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testcase.rb:76
c:0021 p:0015 s:0070 b:0070 l:000064 d:000069 BLOCK
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34
c:0020 p:---- s:0070 b:0070 l:000069 d:000069 FINISH :name
c:0019 p:---- s:0068 b:0068 l:000067 d:000067 CFUNC  :each
c:0018 p:0026 s:0065 b:0065 l:000064 d:000064 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33
c:0017 p:0015 s:0060 b:0060 l:000054 d:000059 BLOCK
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34
c:0016 p:---- s:0060 b:0060 l:000059 d:000059 FINISH :sort_by
c:0015 p:---- s:0058 b:0058 l:000057 d:000057 CFUNC  :each
c:0014 p:0026 s:0055 b:0055 l:000054 d:000054 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33
c:0013 p:0015 s:0050 b:0050 l:000044 d:000049 BLOCK
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34
c:0012 p:---- s:0050 b:0050 l:000049 d:000049 FINISH :(null)
c:0011 p:---- s:0048 b:0048 l:000047 d:000047 CFUNC  :each
c:0010 p:0026 s:0045 b:0045 l:000044 d:000044 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33
c:0009 p:0128 s:0040 b:0040 l:001bb4 d:001bb4 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/testrunnermediator.rb:46
c:0008 p:0008 s:0031 b:0031 l:000030 d:000030 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:67
c:0007 p:0023 s:0028 b:0028 l:000027 d:000027 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:41
c:0006 p:0026 s:0025 b:0025 l:000024 d:000024 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/testrunnerutilities.rb:29
c:0005 p:0051 s:0020 b:0020 l:000019 d:000019 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:216
c:0004 p:0070 s:0016 b:0016 l:000015 d:000015 METHOD
d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:12
c:0003 p:0139 s:0008 b:0007 l:000006 d:000006 TOP
../ruby-1.9.0-0/test/runner.rb:9
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH :inherited
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:000001 d:000001 TOP    <dummy toplevel>:314
---------------------------
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:20:in `block in
test_readline'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:74:in `block (2
levels) in replace_stdio'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/open-uri.rb:35:in `open_uri_original_open'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/open-uri.rb:35:in `open'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:66:in `block in
replace_stdio'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/open-uri.rb:35:in `open_uri_original_open'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/open-uri.rb:35:in `open'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:65:in `replace_stdio'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/test/readline/test_readline.rb:19:in `test_readline'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testcase.rb:76:in `run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34:in `block in run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `each'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34:in `block in run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `each'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34:in `block in run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `each'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/testrunnermediator.rb:46:in
`run_suite'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:67:in
`start_mediator'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:41:in `start'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/ui/testrunnerutilities.rb:29:in `run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:216:in `run'"
DBG> : "d:/ruby-1.9.0-0/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:12:in `run'"
DBG> : "../ruby-1.9.0-0/test/runner.rb:9:in `<main>'"

This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information.
make: *** [test-all] Error 3

I tested this in too different mingw setups, MSYS version and even
with other ruby (1.8.6 and 1.8.5) all with same result.

Check that no other readline.dll, readline4.dll or readline5.dll was
interfering with the tests, but still the same result.

This means I'll need to ditch mingw and get back to VC? :-P
(just thinking out loud).

-- 
Luis Lavena
Multimedia systems
-
A common mistake that people make when trying to design
something completely foolproof is to underestimate
the ingenuity of complete fools.
Douglas Adams

In This Thread

Prev Next