From: Yukihiro Matsumoto Date: 2007-12-12T14:53:08+09:00 Subject: Re: redefineable not operator Hi, In message "Re: redefineable not operator" on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:25:38 +0900, Dave Thomas writes: |> This actually isn't a new situation. Ruby 1.8 has |> this behavior also: | |OK, so the move to extend this behavior is wrong.. :) OK, what do you think the best idea to "fix" this? It's more difficult than one might think at first sight. matz.