From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2007-12-13T15:19:54+09:00
Subject: Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)


On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

> ruby_parser is pure ruby, so that should be ok, but I'm not clear  
> what 1.9's parser output has to do with eliminating the dependency  
> on IRB. We expose JRuby AST (plus comment nodes) directly if  
> someone really wants to use it, but we strongly advise against  
> depending on the AST structure in any way since it changes over time.


Actually, I wasn't talking about removing the irb dependency--there  
isn't one, because I copied the code in and hacked it (a lot). I was  
simply suggesting removing the e2mmap dependency in rdoc.


Dave