[#14696] Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Why can you not rescue return, break, etc when they are within

21 messages 2008/01/02

[#14738] Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...>

The community has been building a Ruby 1.9 compatibility tip list on =20

15 messages 2008/01/03
[#14755] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/04

Hello James,

[#14772] Manual Memory Management — Pramukta Kumar <prak@...>

I was thinking it would be nice to be able to free large objects at

36 messages 2008/01/04
[#14788] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

I would only like to add that RMgick for example provides free method to

[#14824] Re: Manual Memory Management — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/07

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:49:30 +0900, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14825] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Evan Weaver" <evan@...> 2008/01/07

Python supports 'del reference', which decrements the reference

[#14838] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/08

Evan Weaver wrote:

[#14911] Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

24 messages 2008/01/10

[#14976] nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>

The following just appeared in the ChangeLog

37 messages 2008/01/11
[#14977] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14978] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14979] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14993] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14980] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/11

[#14981] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14995] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:

[#15050] how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

Core Rubies:

17 messages 2008/01/13
[#15060] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/14

On Jan 13, 2008, at 08:54 AM, Phlip wrote:

[#15062] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/14

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15073] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/14

On Jan 13, 2008, at 20:35 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15185] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2008/01/22

[#15194] Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Jordi <mumismo@...>

A good article I have found (may have been linked by slashdot, don't know)

8 messages 2008/01/24

[#15248] Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

24 messages 2008/01/28
[#15250] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/28

Hi,

Re: Rexml and Ruby 1.9

From: "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Date: 2008-01-06 22:09:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #14814
On Saturday 05 January 2008, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > I see it, and I have the patch; and I've seen the other patches you've
> > made. Thanks.  Real Work has been demanding for the past few months, and
> > I haven't used my personal computer for anything other than email in th=
at
> > time.  Sorry about the delay.
>
> Matz checked in the code portion of the changes to Ruby 1.9's trunk:
>
> http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=3Drev&revision=3D14826

Good.  The only reason why I haven't been forwarding patches is because the=
y=20
then go into the repo without running through the REXML unit test suite.

> I have other changes in mind, as as long as Matz is willing, I plan to
> continue to make them available for incorporation.
>
> If you are willing, I would be glad to also keep a REXML project
> repository in synch (i.e., one that contains both the code and the
> tests).  If that is not something that you are comfortable with, I
> completely understand, it just means that there will be a greater delta
> for you to reconcile when you once again have the time.

Oh, heck no.  Be my guest.  Any help is greatly appreciated.

> In any case, as REXML is curiously absent from
> http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/trunk/test/, it occurs to me that as
> nobody else is including it in their regression tests, I might as well
> include it in mine.  I have a job that will run a few times a day on my

I haven't taken the time to merge the REXML unit tests with the Ruby test=20
suite.  The only reason why I haven't moved REXML totally into the Ruby tre=
e=20
is because Ruby's bug tracker isn't as good as Trac, and Trac won't integra=
te=20
with a remote Subversion repository (yet, and possibly not ever).

> machine, building ruby 1.9 from scratch, and then running the unit tests
> from a number of projects I care about against it, notifying me of any
> failures.  REXML is included in that, as well as a number of projects
> that build upon REXML.
>
> - Sam Ruby

=2D-=20
### SER  =20
### Deutsch|Esperanto|Francaise|Linux|XML|Java|Ruby|Haskell|Aikido|Iaido
### http://www.ser1.net, http://www.ser1.net/Security/ser_public.gpg
### Jabber: seanerussell@gmail.com (OTR enabled)

In This Thread