ruby-core

[#14663] Inconsisten warnings for unless and if — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>

Happy new year to all of you!

1 message 2008/01/01

[#14690] singleton-of-singleton is Class in 1.9.0 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

In 1.9.0, the singleton of a singleton is Class, while in 1.8 it was a

4 messages 2008/01/02

[#14709] Re: singleton-of-singleton is Class in 1.9.0 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/03

Hi --

[#14992] Re: singleton-of-singleton is Class in 1.9.0 — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#15200] Re: singleton-of-singleton is Class in 1.9.0 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/24

Hi --

[#14691] Have detected bug in file complex.rb — Tommy Nordgren <tommy.nordgren@...>

I have detected a bug in the implementation of Complex division.

1 message 2008/01/02

[#14696] Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Why can you not rescue return, break, etc when they are within

21 messages 2008/01/02

[#14699] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/02

[#14704] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/02

Gary Wright wrote:

[#14705] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/02

[#14706] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/01/03

On Jan 3, 2008 12:53 AM, Gary Wright <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:

[#14707] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/03

[#14712] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/03

Gary Wright wrote:

[#14713] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/03

[#14722] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/03

Gary Wright wrote:

[#14732] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/03

[#14736] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/03

Gary Wright wrote:

[#14739] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/03

[#14710] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2008/01/03

I would think that any correct code should behave exactly the same when it is eval'ed as string. Or shouldn't it? Are there any cases where

[#14701] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/02

On Jan 2, 2008 5:26 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:

[#14702] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/02

On Jan 2, 2008 5:47 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14703] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/02

Rick DeNatale wrote:

[#14717] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/01/03

Hi,

[#14698] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/02

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#14718] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/01/03

Hi,

[#14700] Re: [Spam] Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2008/01/02

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#14697] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/02

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#14708] insns.def contains invalid mbstring? — "Tim Morgan" <tmorgan99@...>

Hello:

1 message 2008/01/03

[#14720] bug reports about 1.9 VM — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/01/03

[#14723] Re: bug reports about 1.9 VM — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/03

>>>>> "S" == SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> writes:

[#14724] Re: bug reports about 1.9 VM — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/01/03

Hi,

[#14757] Extension tests (Was: bug reports about 1.9 VM) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/04

On Jan 3, 2008, at 03:17 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#14737] JRuby stdlib updated to 1.8.6, patch to stdlib attached — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

JRuby has updated to the 1.8.6_111 stdlib. This was done by diffing our

1 message 2008/01/03

[#14738] Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...>

The community has been building a Ruby 1.9 compatibility tip list on

15 messages 2008/01/03

[#14755] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/04

Hello James,

[#14764] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/04

On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:

[#14771] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/04

By the way the RDOC for Enumerable#zip for 1.9 seems to need some work:

[#14828] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/07

On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:

[#14832] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/08

Hi,

[#14836] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 7, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14837] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/08

Hi,

[#14843] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 7, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14844] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/08

Hi,

[#14858] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 8, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14957] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/10

On Jan 10, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Robert Dober wrote:

[#14867] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/08

Hi,

[#14869] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 8, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14961] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/10

On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Robert Dober wrote:

[#14740] Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

In the section on writing C extensions for Ruby, I'm talking about

9 messages 2008/01/04

[#14741] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14743] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14744] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/04

[#14748] Re: [Spam] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2008/01/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14746] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/04

[#14742] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/01/04

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14805] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/06

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14807] Re: Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/06

[#14745] #initialize never called in subclasses of Fiber — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>

Hi, I'm doing an Actor implementation which subclasses Fiber, and I'm

1 message 2008/01/04

[#14747] BasicObject.instance_eval — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

I'm looking at converting some code over from BlankSlate to BasicObject,

13 messages 2008/01/04

[#14750] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/01/04

On Jan 3, 2008 10:06 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

[#14753] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/04

[#14770] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14758] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/04

Hi --

[#14765] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/01/04

On Jan 4, 2008 6:43 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#14749] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14763] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/04

On Jan 3, 2008, at 10:25 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14781] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/05

James Gray wrote:

[#14782] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/05

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#14751] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2008/01/04

[#14752] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14769] Re: BasicObject.instance_eval — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14759] time_arg and false RString struct bug. — Guillermo <guillermo@...>

Excuse me if these is not the right place to expose these bug.

2 messages 2008/01/04

[#14766] Re: time_arg and false RString struct bug. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14760] patches on rubyforge — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

I submitted a patch last night to rubyforge thinking an email would get

3 messages 2008/01/04

[#14783] Re: patches on rubyforge — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/01/05

[#14806] Re: patches on rubyforge — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/06

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#14761] Builder on 1.9 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

This may be of interest to some on this mailing list:

1 message 2008/01/04

[#14762] attaching data to a method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

On Ruby 1.9, is it possible to attach data to a method, to be retrieved

1 message 2008/01/04

[#14767] typo in 1.9.0 (mswin32 binary) rbconfig.rb? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

After installing mswin32 binary from

2 messages 2008/01/04

[#14768] Re: typo in 1.9.0 (mswin32 binary) rbconfig.rb? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/04

Hi,

[#14772] Manual Memory Management — Pramukta Kumar <prak@...>

I was thinking it would be nice to be able to free large objects at

36 messages 2008/01/04

[#14779] Re: Manual Memory Management — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/05

Hi,

[#14773] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/04

On Jan 4, 2008 1:25 PM, Pramukta Kumar <prak@fortiusone.com> wrote:

[#14774] Re: Manual Memory Management — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2008/01/04

[#14775] Re: Manual Memory Management — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/01/04

James Tucker wrote:

[#14776] Re: Manual Memory Management — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/04

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:27:48 +0900, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:

[#14777] Re: Manual Memory Management — Pramukta Kumar <prak@...> 2008/01/04

ah okay. I think I understand the concerns. would the dangling

[#14778] Re: Manual Memory Management — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/04

[#14780] Re: Manual Memory Management — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/05

Gary Wright wrote:

[#14790] Re: Manual Memory Management — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/01/05

Gary Wright wrote:

[#14788] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

I would only like to add that RMgick for example provides free method to

[#14789] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

sorry for responding to my own post.

[#14795] Re: Manual Memory Management — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/01/05

Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#14798] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#14794] Re: Manual Memory Management — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/01/05

Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#14797] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

[#14799] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/01/05

On Jan 5, 2008 8:35 PM, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14800] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/01/05

On Jan 5, 2008 9:14 PM, Meinrad Recheis <meinrad.recheis@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14801] Re: Manual Memory Management — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/01/05

Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#14802] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

Still it would be really nice if instead of doing array.clear or

[#14824] Re: Manual Memory Management — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/07

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:49:30 +0900, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14825] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Evan Weaver" <evan@...> 2008/01/07

Python supports 'del reference', which decrements the reference

[#14838] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/08

Evan Weaver wrote:

[#14842] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/01/08

On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#14888] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/09

Marc Haisenko wrote:

[#14861] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 8, 2008 12:35 AM, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14870] Re: Manual Memory Management — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/08

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:35:28 +0900, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14873] Re: Manual Memory Management — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/01/09

MenTaLguY wrote:

[#14904] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Ben Schumacher" <benschumacher@...> 2008/01/09

On Jan 8, 2008 6:09 PM, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:

[#14890] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/01/09

On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Kurt Stephens wrote:

[#14902] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/09

On Jan 8, 2008 8:09 PM, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:

[#14905] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Evan Weaver" <evan@...> 2008/01/09

I didn't mean to switch to a reference counting GC although I wouldn't

[#14950] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/10

Kurt Stephens:

[#14973] Re: Manual Memory Management — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/01/11

Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#14982] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/11

Kurt Stephens wrote:

[#17040] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/06/02

---------- Forwarded message ----------

[#14785] String.clone may segfault since rev 14817 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Symptoms:

4 messages 2008/01/05

[#14786] Re: String.clone may segfault since rev 14817 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/05

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#14787] Re: String.clone may segfault since rev 14817 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/05

Hi,

[#14792] Re: String.clone may segfault since rev 14817 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/05

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#14793] Strange behavior when send is used to call private method :binding — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>

Hi everyone,

2 messages 2008/01/05

[#14809] Re: Strange behavior when send is used to call private method :binding — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/06

Dirkjan Bussink wrote:

[#14796] Comment for future documentation of String#[] (etc.) — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

1 message 2008/01/05

[#14810] 64 bit VS 32 bit — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/01/06

[#14812] Re: 64 bit VS 32 bit — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/01/06

Charles Thornton wrote:

[#14822] Re: 64 bit VS 32 bit — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/07

The data structures used for String#encode are also currently not

[#14811] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Brent Roman <brent@...>

Paul,

4 messages 2008/01/06

[#14823] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/07

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:01:45AM +0900, Brent Roman wrote:

[#14827] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/07

Hi,

[#14834] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/08

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#14813] Changes in block_given? in 1.9 — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>

The following code output differs between 1.8 and 1.9:

3 messages 2008/01/06

[#14819] Re: Changes in block_given? in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/07

Hi,

[#14820] Re: Changes in block_given? in 1.9 — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2008/01/07

Good. Is your intention to make the following code work after the bug is fixed? (I.e. will yield be special-cased for define_method?)

[#14815] Embedding a 1.9 interpreter — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm updating the PickAxe section on embedding the Ruby interpreter in

1 message 2008/01/06

[#14816] Fibers clear thread-specific data? — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>

Is this behavior intentional?

7 messages 2008/01/07

[#14826] Re: Fibers clear thread-specific data? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/07

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 09:34:35 +0900, "Tony Arcieri" <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:

[#14833] Re: Fibers clear thread-specific data? — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 7, 2008 1:29 PM, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:

[#14908] Re: Fibers clear thread-specific data? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/09

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 11:12 +0900, Tony Arcieri wrote:

[#14910] Re: Fibers clear thread-specific data? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/10

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 07:55 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#14951] Re: Fibers clear thread-specific data? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/10

On 1/9/08, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:

[#14955] Re: Fibers clear thread-specific data? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/10

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:51:07 +0900, "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14829] Finding I need explicit "GC.start" in my programs to prevent extreme growth. — Ron Mayer <rm_rails@...>

Short summary:

4 messages 2008/01/07

[#14853] Re: Finding I need explicit "GC.start" in my programs to prevent extreme growth. — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/01/08

[#14855] Re: Finding I need explicit "GC.start" in my programs to prevent extreme growth. — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/01/08

[#14841] Re: Finding I need explicit "GC.start" in my programs to prevent extreme growth. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/08

On Jan 7, 2008, at 14:51 PM, Ron Mayer wrote:

[#14830] Is there a dependency issue in the building HEAD? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

During the build, I get

2 messages 2008/01/07

[#14831] Re: Is there a dependency issue in the building HEAD? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/07

Hi,

[#14839] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Moved over from ruby-talk...

16 messages 2008/01/08

[#14847] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/01/08

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14848] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/08

[#14864] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/08

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:04:03AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14865] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/08

[#14866] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/08

[#14875] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/09

Hi,

[#14881] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/09

[#14886] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/09

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14887] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/09

[#14895] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/09

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:56:34PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14849] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2008/01/08

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14850] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/08

[#14852] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2008/01/08

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14874] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/09

Hi,

[#14840] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/08

[#14845] Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>

Hello,

7 messages 2008/01/08

[#14846] Re: Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Jason Roelofs" <jameskilton@...> 2008/01/08

Use semicolons. I would venture to say that this isn't supposed to work in

[#14857] Re: Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...> 2008/01/08

Jason Roelofs wrote:

[#14860] Re: Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/01/08

On Jan 8, 2008 2:42 PM, Florian Frank <flori@nixe.ping.de> wrote:

[#14868] Re: Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/08

Hi,

[#14882] Re: Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...> 2008/01/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14883] Re: Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2008/01/09

On Jan 8, 2008 10:11 PM, Florian Frank <flori@nixe.ping.de> wrote:

[#14851] Unbelievably strange performance behavior of String#<< — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

1 message 2008/01/08

[#14854] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

2 messages 2008/01/08

[#14896] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/09

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:03:49AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14856] Precision of Float —

Hi,

4 messages 2008/01/08

[#14859] Re: Precision of Float — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/08

[#14863] Re: Precision of Float — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/08

[#14891] Re: Precision of Float — Frederick Cheung <frederick.cheung@...> 2008/01/09

[#14871] p returning its argument? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

7 messages 2008/01/09

[#14872] Re: p returning its argument? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/01/09

On Jan 9, 2008 1:14 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#14876] Re: p returning its argument? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/09

Hi --

[#14879] Re: p returning its argument? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/01/09

David A. Black wrote:

[#14894] Re: p returning its argument? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/09

Hi --

[#14878] Re: p returning its argument? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/01/09

[#14901] Re: p returning its argument? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/01/09

On Jan 9, 2008 3:35 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#14877] Array#count returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

7 messages 2008/01/09

[#14912] Re: Array#count returning an enumerator — "Yukihiro Matsumoto" <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14919] Re: Array#count returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/10

Hi --

[#14920] Re: Array#count returning an enumerator — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14922] Re: Array#count returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/10

Hi --

[#14952] Re: Array#count returning an enumerator — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/10

On 1/10/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#14999] Re: Array#count returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/11

Hi --

[#14884] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>

9 messages 2008/01/09

[#14889] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/09

Hi,

[#14897] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/09

[#14898] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/09

Hi,

[#14899] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/09

[#14900] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/09

Hi,

[#14903] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/09

[#14915] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/10

On Jan 9, 2008, at 09:10 AM, ara howard wrote:

[#14932] Re: [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/10

[#14885] Segmentation fault when calling procs — Chris "ク" Heath <chris@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2008/01/09

[#14892] Re: Segmentation fault when calling procs — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/09

>>>>> "C" == Chris "ク" Heath <Chris> writes:

[#14983] Re: Segmentation fault when calling procs — Chris "ク" Heath <chris@...> 2008/01/11

On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 19:22 +0900, Guy Decoux wrote:

[#14990] Re: Segmentation fault when calling procs — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14989] Re: Segmentation fault when calling procs — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/01/11

> Explanation:

[#15032] Re: Segmentation fault when calling procs — George <george.ogata@...> 2008/01/12

On Jan 11, 2008 9:54 PM, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14906] initialize_copy and singletons — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>

It seems like a singleton class is not searched for initialize_copy.

2 messages 2008/01/09

[#14907] Re: initialize_copy and singletons — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/09

[#14909] Re: why does this code leak? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>

On Jan 9, 2008 5:18 PM, ara howard <ara.t.howard@gmail.com> wrote:

1 message 2008/01/09

[#14911] Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

24 messages 2008/01/10

[#14913] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14938] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/10

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14941] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14917] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/10

At 16:26 08/01/10, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14923] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

[#14930] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/10

Dave Thomas schrieb:

[#14925] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/01/10

On 10/01/2008, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#14926] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

[#14928] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14927] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14914] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — "Song Ma" <songmash@...> 2008/01/10

2008/1/10, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com>:

[#14916] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/10

Hello Dave,

[#14931] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

>

[#14934] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14942] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/01/10

On 10/01/2008, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#14936] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

[#14945] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14947] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

[#14946] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — "Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi" <ujwalic@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#14948] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/10

Hi,

[#15034] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/12

At 02:38 08/01/11, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#15051] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — "Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi" <ujwalic@...> 2008/01/13

Thanks Martin .. I was looking for "Oniguruma"

[#14984] Re: Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — "Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi" <ujwalic@...> 2008/01/11

Thanks Matz

[#14918] usage of Ruby as an embedded interpreter on smartcards — "Dmitri Shorin" <dmitri.shorin@...>

Dear Ruby Community,

2 messages 2008/01/10

[#14921] Re: usage of Ruby as an embedded interpreter on smartcards — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/01/10

On Jan 10, 2008 9:58 AM, Dmitri Shorin <dmitri.shorin@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14929] Re: Using values of mandantory arguments in default values — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/01/10

[#14937] Re: Really strange GC behaviour: Was [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>

1 message 2008/01/10

[#14939] SVN Revison 71 — "John Lam (DLR)" <jflam@...>

The major Ruby-visible change is the addition of super thanks to John Messerly.

3 messages 2008/01/10

[#14940] Re: SVN Revison 71 — "John Lam (DLR)" <jflam@...> 2008/01/10

> The major Ruby-visible change is the addition of super thanks to John

[#14949] Re: SVN Revison 71 — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/01/10

On Jan 10, 2008 5:40 PM, John Lam (DLR) <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#14943] Re: Really strange GC behaviour: Was [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>

4 messages 2008/01/10

[#14958] Re: Really strange GC behaviour: Was [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/10

[#14986] Re: Really strange GC behaviour: Was [BUG] memory leak? — Chris "ク" Heath <chris@...> 2008/01/11

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 04:38 +0900, ara howard wrote:

[#14953] Re: Really strange GC behaviour: Was [BUG] memory leak? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/10

On 1/10/08, ara howard <ara.t.howard@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14944] case when end — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/01/10

[#14959] 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>

It's unclear to me whether or not the tracker on Rubyforge is still

7 messages 2008/01/10

[#14963] Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/10

Rick DeNatale wrote:

[#14964] Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

[#14987] Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/11

On Jan 10, 2008, at 13:52 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14991] Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/11

On 1/11/08, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#14988] Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/11

On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:

[#15021] Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/01/11

[#14962] Fiber in iterators — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi list

3 messages 2008/01/10

[#15043] Re: [Bug?] Fiber in iterators — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/01/12

Well I kind of expected that somebody would call me stupid or

[#15045] Re: [Bug?] Fiber in iterators — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/13

[#14965] Before I create a ticket — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Is it reasonable to expect the following to produce differing counts

6 messages 2008/01/10

[#14966] Re: Before I create a ticket — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/10

[#14969] Re: Before I create a ticket — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/10

[#14972] Re: Before I create a ticket — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/10

[#14974] Re: Before I create a ticket — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14975] Re: Before I create a ticket — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14976] nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>

The following just appeared in the ChangeLog

37 messages 2008/01/11

[#14977] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14978] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14979] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14993] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#15007] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/01/11

In article <819B3A96-FD98-4BFA-99FA-5D1E0ADB9EC1@pragprog.com>,

[#15008] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#15003] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/11

Dave Thomas schrieb:

[#15005] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#15006] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2008/01/11

I guess the returned single-byte string has binary encoding as well.

[#15019] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/11

Dave Thomas schrieb:

[#15023] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/11

[#15027] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/11

Gary Wright schrieb:

[#15033] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/12

At 05:56 08/01/12, Gary Wright wrote:

[#15039] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/12

[#15001] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/01/11

On 11/01/2008, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#15002] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#15035] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/12

At 01:31 08/01/12, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14994] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2008/01/11

On Jan 11, 2008 12:59 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#14980] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/11

[#14981] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14995] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:

[#14996] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#15009] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#15012] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#15015] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#15036] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/12

At 04:30 08/01/12, David Flanagan wrote:

[#15037] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...> 2008/01/12

[#15038] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/12

Vincent Isambart wrote:

[#15046] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/13

At 19:44 08/01/12, Vincent Isambart wrote:

[#15016] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14997] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/11

David Flanagan wrote:

[#15000] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/11

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15010] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#15011] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#15013] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#15014] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14985] Stack memory leaks on i386 — Chris "ク" Heath <chris@...>

While debugging a Ruby 1.9 crash, I noticed some machine stack memory

1 message 2008/01/11

[#15018] Re: [Ruby 1.9] NKF — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/01/11

[#15031] Re: [Ruby 1.9] NKF — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/01/12

Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:

[#15091] Re: [Ruby 1.9] NKF — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/16

>>>>> "K" == Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de> writes:

[#15077] Re: [Ruby 1.9] NKF — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/15

On Jan 11, 2008, at 13:02 PM, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:

[#15079] Re: [Ruby 1.9] NKF — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/01/15

Hi,

[#15020] base64 — Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...>

Is anyone working on base64? is it obsolete now or will be replaced

2 messages 2008/01/11

[#15024] Re: base64 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/11

Rolando Abarca wrote:

[#15028] Re: Next Ruby 1.9 release (1.9.1)? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Kornelius Kalnbach schrieb:

2 messages 2008/01/11

[#15030] Re: Next Ruby 1.9 release (1.9.1)? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/12

Hi,

[#15040] rb_rescue2 crashes 1.9.0-0 — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2008/01/12

[#15071] Re: [1.9] rb_rescue2 crashes 1.9.0-0 — "matt whisenhunt" <matt@...> 2008/01/14

unsubscribe

[#15041] String methods and internal regexp usage — =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Marcin_Miel=BFy=F1ski?= <lopx@...>

Some String methods (notably split, scan, sub and gsub) use regexp

1 message 2008/01/12

[#15042] Maintainers needed ? — Laurent Julliard <laurent@...>

I think I may have some spare cycles in the coming weeks/months and I

1 message 2008/01/12

[#15044] Build failures 15007-15013 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Just FYI, starting with 15007, I am not able to do a successful build.

5 messages 2008/01/13

[#15048] Re: Build failures 15007-15013 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/13

>>>>> "S" == Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> writes:

[#15054] Re: Build failures 15007-15013 — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/01/13

For revision 15028, during compiling I get:

[#15059] Re: Build failures 15007-15013 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/14

The order of the arguments was wrong in one case.

[#15140] Re: Build failures 15007-15013 — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/01/19

For revision 15122, during compilation I get:

[#15049] Does Symbol#next work unter Ruby 1.9 with intention or by accident? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Dear language designers and developers!

1 message 2008/01/13

[#15050] how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

Core Rubies:

17 messages 2008/01/13

[#15053] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/13

> Most people seem to use either Syntax or CodeRay

[#15060] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/14

On Jan 13, 2008, at 08:54 AM, Phlip wrote:

[#15062] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/14

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15073] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/14

On Jan 13, 2008, at 20:35 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15089] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/16

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15103] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/16

On Jan 15, 2008, at 18:19 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15105] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/16

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15117] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/17

On Jan 16, 2008, at 15:01 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15129] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/18

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15139] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/19

On Jan 17, 2008, at 17:57 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15141] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/19

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15142] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/19

On Jan 18, 2008, at 19:39 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15144] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/19

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15145] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/19

[#15152] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/19

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15082] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/15

> You shouldn't need to use the HTML generator at all, look in

[#15055] Very strange bug which causes segmentation fault. — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>

I found very, very strange bug in ruby 1.9. I've discovered that

2 messages 2008/01/13

[#15067] Re: [BUG]Very strange bug which causes segmentation fault. — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/01/14

Here's my addr2line output based on previuus dump:

[#15056] How to use "addr2line" — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/01/13

[#15057] Re: How to use "addr2line" — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/01/13

Thanks for explanation. I have one question regarding to this topic.

[#15061] Re: How to use "addr2line" — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/14

SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#15064] Re: How to use "addr2line" — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/14

>>>>> "S" == Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> writes:

[#15063] Re: How to use "addr2line" — ville.mattila@... 2008/01/14

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote on 13.01.2008 23:54:25:

[#15058] warning messages of little consequence — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

In running the test suite for ruby-openid, I noted the following warnings:

1 message 2008/01/14

[#15065] Monotonic scheduler — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/01/14

[#15066] Re: Monotonic scheduler — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2008/01/14

And here is the current patch.

[#15068] Ruby magic local-var leak — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

Here is the rubyforge ticket :

1 message 2008/01/14

[#15069] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Yesterday, I got ruby-openid to work with Ruby 1.9, rev 15006

7 messages 2008/01/14

[#15070] Re: [BUG] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/14

Hi,

[#15072] Re: [BUG] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/14

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#15075] Re: [BUG] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/15

Hi,

[#15076] Re: [BUG] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/15

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#15090] Re: [BUG] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/16

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15074] Encoding alias odditities — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/15

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15078] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

I while ago on ruby-core there was some discussion about SCRIPT_LINES__ and

1 message 2008/01/15

[#15080] Sort of a memory leak for Ruby 1.8.6? — "Joao Pedrosa" <joaopedrosa@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/01/15

[#15081] Ruby 1.9 Tinderbox — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Summary:

1 message 2008/01/15

[#15083] Why @hash ||= Hash.new in Set#initialize? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

4 messages 2008/01/15

[#15088] Re: Why @hash ||= Hash.new in Set#initialize? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/15

Hi --

[#15116] Re: Why @hash ||= Hash.new in Set#initialize? — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/01/17

[#15119] Re: Why @hash ||= Hash.new in Set#initialize? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/17

Hi --

[#15084] Incorrect Date.to_s behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/01/15

[#15092] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi list

6 messages 2008/01/16

[#15093] Re: [Bug?] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/16

Hi --

[#15094] Re: [Bug?] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/01/16

On Jan 16, 2008 1:23 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#15095] Re: [Bug?] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/16

>>>>> "R" == Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> writes:

[#15096] Re: [Bug?] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — "Cheah Chu Yeow" <chuyeow@...> 2008/01/16

>

[#15097] Re: [Bug?] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/01/16

Thank you all, just another question, is there a better way to browse

[#15098] Bug in Date::Infinity#<=> — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2008/01/16

[#15099] Re: Bug in Date::Infinity#<=> — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/01/16

> -----Original Message-----

[#15112] Re: Bug in Date::Infinity#<=> — brabuhr@... 2008/01/17

On Jan 16, 2008 11:25 AM, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:

[#15100] Re: Bug in Date::Infinity#<=> — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...> 2008/01/16

[#15101] Rdoc (1.8 and 1.9): Wrong processing if using do blocks in an expression — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

1 message 2008/01/16

[#15102] REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

okay, I saw them. Now what?

8 messages 2008/01/16

[#15104] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/16

Phlip wrote:

[#15106] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/16

> Meanwhile try something like the following:

[#15146] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/01/19

On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Phlip wrote:

[#15110] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/17

Phlip wrote:

[#15111] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/17

> I guess I'll let Sean take it from here, other than to note that .to_s

[#15135] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/01/18

On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Phlip wrote:

[#15136] Re: REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/01/18

On Friday 18 January 2008, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#15107] gets is blocking print in simple example — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2008/01/16

[#15126] Re: gets is blocking print in simple example — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/18

Hi --

[#15127] Re: gets is blocking print in simple example — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/18

Hi,

[#15108] ruby-1.8.6-p111/lib/rdoc/markup/test fails — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

just out of curiosity...

1 message 2008/01/16

[#15109] RDoc tests Was: Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>

On Jan 17, 2008 12:01 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:

2 messages 2008/01/17

[#15118] Re: RDoc tests Was: Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/17

On Jan 16, 2008, at 16:11 PM, Jano Svitok wrote:

[#15113] Ruby 1.8/1.9 performance tests? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

I'm looking for general performance tests that will run in both ruby 1.8

3 messages 2008/01/17

[#15115] Re: Ruby 1.8/1.9 performance tests? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/01/17

Kurt Stephens wrote:

[#15137] Re: Ruby 1.8/1.9 performance tests? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/01/18

Considering the ActiveRecord will introduce dependency on a external

[#15114] Ruby 1.9: PATCH: Fixnum#gcd (Reprise) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

I'm reposting this as it appears no one except Ryan had any comments. :)

1 message 2008/01/17

[#15120] Bug with ruby1.9 — Etienne Vallette d'Osia <dohzya@...>

Hi everyone,

2 messages 2008/01/17

[#15121] Re: Bug with ruby1.9 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/17

>>>>> "E" == Etienne Vallette d'Osia <dohzya@gmail.com> writes:

[#15124] IRHG - What is the second parameter used for in gc_mark(ptr, lev)? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

The lev parameter has been added in the last several major versions-

1 message 2008/01/18

[#15125] test_m17n segmentation fault — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

I don't know if anybody else is seeing this, but on a build of 15098 I'm

3 messages 2008/01/18

[#15128] Re: test_m17n segmentation fault — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/18

Hi,

[#15130] Re: test_m17n segmentation fault — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/18

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#15131] test/rdoc/test_simple_markup_attribute_manager.rb:2:in `require': no such file to load -- rdoc/markup/simple_markup/inline (LoadError) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

test-all failed as follows.

4 messages 2008/01/18

[#15132] Re: test/rdoc/test_simple_markup_attribute_manager.rb:2:in `require': no such file to load -- rdoc/markup/simple_markup/inline (LoadError) — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/18

> test-all failed as follows.

[#15133] Re: test/rdoc/test_simple_markup_attribute_manager.rb:2:in `require': no such file to load -- rdoc/markup/simple_markup/inline (LoadError) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/18

On Jan 17, 2008, at 19:54 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15134] Re: test/rdoc/test_simple_markup_attribute_manager.rb:2:in `require': no such file to load -- rdoc/markup/simple_markup/inline (LoadError) — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/18

> Yes, the tests are not very helpful for finding problems since they

[#15143] Build error, revisions 15119-15126 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

This change:

1 message 2008/01/19

[#15147] String initialziation — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...>

Mayby strange question but what happens when someone for example types

13 messages 2008/01/19

[#15148] Re: String initialziation — Marcin Mielżyński <lopx@...> 2008/01/19

Marcin Raczkowski pisze:

[#15149] Re: String initialziation — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/19

[#15150] Re: String initialziation — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/19

Gary Wright wrote:

[#15156] Re: String initialziation — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/20

Marcin Raczkowski schrieb:

[#15157] Re: String initialziation — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/20

> What's your use case? Just curious.

[#15158] Re: String initialziation — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/20

[#15159] Re: String initialziation — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/20

Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#15161] Re: String initialziation — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/20

Phlip wrote:

[#15162] Re: String initialziation — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/20

Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#15163] Re: String initialziation — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/20

> If I understood Aspect Oriented Programming, I think we are asking for

[#15151] Re: String initialziation — Marcin Mielżyński <lopx@...> 2008/01/19

Marcin Raczkowski pisze:

[#15154] Re: String initialziation — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/20

At 07:30 08/01/20, Marcin Raczkowski wrote:

[#15153] — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

1 message 2008/01/20

[#15155] an example of performance improvements — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>

For those not reading ruby-dev, I just wanted to point to

8 messages 2008/01/20

[#15165] Re: an example of performance improvements — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/20

Hi,

[#15168] Re: an example of performance improvements — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/21

Martin Duerst wrote:

[#15171] Re: an example of performance improvements — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/21

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#15175] Re: an example of performance improvements — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...> 2008/01/21

[#15179] Re: an example of performance improvements — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/21

Vincent Isambart wrote:

[#15180] Re: an example of performance improvements — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/21

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#15184] Re: an example of performance improvements — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/22

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:46:37AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#15160] SimpleDelegator.class changed? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Should the following program produces different results with Ruby 1.8.6

1 message 2008/01/20

[#15164] convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

Rubiods:

8 messages 2008/01/20

[#15166] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/01/20

On Jan 20, 2008 6:02 PM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:

[#15169] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/21

Luis Lavena wrote:

[#15178] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/01/21

[#15167] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/21

Phlip wrote:

[#15170] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/21

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#15176] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...> 2008/01/21

Hi Phlip,

[#15181] Re: convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/21

Dominik Bathon wrote:

[#15172] Vectored Exception Handling? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2008/01/21

[#15182] Empty bin and lib install directories with Rev 15170 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

With Rev 15170, my install directory looks like this:

2 messages 2008/01/22

[#15183] Re: Empty bin and lib install directories with Rev 15170 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/22

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15185] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2008/01/22

[#15187] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/22

> A question about your implementation: Why don't you just alias < and >?

[#15189] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/23

At 05:42 08/01/23, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:

[#15190] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/23

> There is even some cultural dependency here. In Japanese, for example,

[#15191] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Mathieu Blondel" <mblondel@...> 2008/01/23

Hi,

[#15193] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/24

A new thought:

[#15207] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/25

Here is the newest patch. It creates a module called Temporal which contains

[#15208] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/25

Does anyone think that it is a good idea to include similar methods for

[#15209] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/25

At 11:38 08/01/25, Jim Cropcho wrote:

[#15224] Re: [PATCH] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/26

Well, it looks like the Temporal mixin is ready to go. Should I submit the

[#15188] Build failure in 15174 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Building 15174:

1 message 2008/01/22

[#15192] build failure, rev 15195-15201 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

I don't know if others are seeing this, but since

1 message 2008/01/24

[#15194] Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Jordi <mumismo@...>

A good article I have found (may have been linked by slashdot, don't know)

8 messages 2008/01/24

[#15196] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — James Gray <james@...> 2008/01/24

On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:07 PM, Jordi wrote:

[#15205] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...> 2008/01/24

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:17:34 +0900, James Gray wrote:

[#15219] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/01/25

Jay Levitt wrote:

[#15220] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/25

Kurt Stephens wrote:

[#15229] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2008/01/26

The point I think is that being the dynamic nature of languages as Ruby

[#15230] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhovsky@...> 2008/01/27

On Jan 26, 2008 9:51 AM, Jordi <mumismo@gmail.com> wrote:

[#15195] Re: Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/24

> I am just arguing that the author may have reason and dynamic language

[#15197] broken rexml — Jan Dvorak <jan.dvorak@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/01/24

[#15198] Re: broken rexml — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/24

Jan Dvorak wrote:

[#15199] Two build issues — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

1. If the directory pointed to by --prefix is a symbolic link, then

5 messages 2008/01/24

[#15201] Re: Two build issues — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/24

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:

[#15202] Re: Two build issues — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/24

ts wrote:

[#15203] Re: Two build issues — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/24

>>>>> "S" == Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> writes:

[#15204] Re: Two build issues — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/24

ts wrote:

[#15206] Troubles building 1.8.6 on Solaris 10 — "Justin Rich" <jrich013@...>

Hi everyone,

2 messages 2008/01/24

[#15210] Re: Troubles building 1.8.6 on Solaris 10 — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/01/25

On Thursday 24 January 2008, Justin Rich wrote:

[#15211] String#include? documentation patch — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

2 messages 2008/01/25

[#15222] Re: String#include? documentation patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/26

Hi,

[#15212] case when syntax changed ??? — "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@...>

did the case when syntax changed with 1.9 ???

5 messages 2008/01/25

[#15214] Re: case when syntax changed ??? — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/25

>>>>> "Y" == Yvon Thoraval <yvon.thoraval@gmail.com> writes:

[#15215] Re: case when syntax changed ??? — "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@...> 2008/01/25

Fine, thanks to both !

[#15216] Re: case when syntax changed ??? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/25

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:17:25 +0900, "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@gmail.com> wrote:

[#15213] Re: case when syntax changed ??? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/25

Yvon Thoraval wrote:

[#15217] ruby-1.9.0-0 and Tk — "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@...>

I had successfully tested ruby 1.9 (early december 2007) with Tk, but right

5 messages 2008/01/25

[#15218] Re: ruby-1.9.0-0 and Tk — Christian Surlykke <christian@...> 2008/01/25

Fredag den 25. Januar 2008 skrev Yvon Thoraval:

[#15226] Re: ruby-1.9.0-0 and Tk — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2008/01/26

From: Christian Surlykke <christian@surlykke.dk>

[#15225] Re: ruby-1.9.0-0 and Tk — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2008/01/26

From: "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@gmail.com>

[#15228] Re: ruby-1.9.0-0 and Tk — "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@...> 2008/01/26

thanks to all !

[#15221] Ruby Class Object Serialization -- HELP — "Jack Xu" <jackxxu@...>

I have created a ruby class at runtime with its methods created using

3 messages 2008/01/25

[#15227] Re: Ruby Class Object Serialization -- HELP — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/26

Jack Xu wrote:

[#15232] Re: Ruby Class Object Serialization -- HELP — "Jack Xu" <jackxxu@...> 2008/01/27

Phlip, thanks for the response. Yes, please let me know about the process to

[#15223] — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Anybody have an answer? html5lib makes use of this feature.

1 message 2008/01/26

[#15231] line event weirdness on if statements. Program to show trace event lines — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Recently I've been working on a module which will show all the trace event

1 message 2008/01/27

[#15233] Regular expressions, string interpolation, and encoding — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

The last line doesn't seem right:

2 messages 2008/01/27

[#15287] Re: Regular expressions, string interpolation, and encoding — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/29

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15234] Gem install error on head — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I built HEAD into a totally clean destination (so there were no

6 messages 2008/01/27

[#15326] Re: Gem install error on head — "Nikos Mouchtaris" <muhtaris@...> 2008/01/31

On 27/01/2008, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#15327] Re: Gem install error on head — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/02/01

Nikos Mouchtaris wrote:

[#15328] Re: Gem install error on head — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/02/01

On Jan 31, 2008 11:45 PM, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:

[#15329] Re: Gem install error on head — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/02/01

[#15330] Re: Gem install error on head — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/02/01

The problem maybe related to open-uri.rb:385:

[#15235] Problem with ri on fresh install — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Built and installed HEAD into a clean tree.

1 message 2008/01/27

[#15236] Encoding of unicode strings is now ASCII-8BIT? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Before:

4 messages 2008/01/27

[#15237] Re: Encoding of unicode strings is now ASCII-8BIT? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/27

[#15239] Re: Encoding of unicode strings is now ASCII-8BIT? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/27

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#15241] Re: Encoding of unicode strings is now ASCII-8BIT? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/27

Hi,

[#15238] CI for Ruby core? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Perhaps it's time to set up a continuous integration server for ruby

10 messages 2008/01/27

[#15242] Re: CI for Ruby core? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/01/27

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#15243] Re: CI for Ruby core? — "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhovsky@...> 2008/01/27

On Jan 27, 2008 4:01 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:

[#15244] Re: CI for Ruby core? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/27

Alexey Verkhovsky wrote:

[#15246] Re: CI for Ruby core? — "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhovsky@...> 2008/01/28

On Jan 27, 2008 4:59 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

[#15247] Re: CI for Ruby core? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/01/28

On Jan 27, 2008 10:25 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky@gmail.com> wrote:

[#15251] Re: CI for Ruby core? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/01/28

Alexey Verkhovsky wrote:

[#15240] Re: CI for Ruby core? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/27

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#15245] Re: CI for Ruby core? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/01/28

In article <D4F8C60C-FDB7-405E-B021-ADC35B5C7568@sun.com>,

[#15249] Re: CI for Ruby core? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/28

Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#15248] Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

24 messages 2008/01/28

[#15250] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/28

Hi,

[#15252] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhovsky@...> 2008/01/28

On Jan 27, 2008 7:54 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#15254] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/28

[#15253] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/28

Hi --

[#15255] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/28

Hi,

[#15272] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/28

Hi --

[#15256] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15258] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/28

[#15259] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15266] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/28

[#15267] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15273] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/28

[#15274] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15275] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/28

[#15276] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15278] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/28

[#15271] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/01/28

Hi --

[#15261] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/28

On 1/28/08, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#15264] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/01/28

> On 1/28/08, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#15265] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/28

On 1/28/08, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:

[#15262] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15260] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/01/28

On 1/27/08, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#15263] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/28

[#15257] a new kind of assertion — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

Ruby-core:

12 messages 2008/01/28

[#15306] Re: a new kind of assertion — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/01/29

[#15307] Re: a new kind of assertion — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/29

> assert{ puts "hello"; a == 4; b == 3 }

[#15269] Re: a new kind of assertion — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/01/28

On Jan 28, 2008 5:45 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:

[#15270] Re: a new kind of assertion — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/28

Meinrad Recheis wrote:

[#15277] Re: a new kind of assertion — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/28

+1

[#15282] Re: a new kind of assertion — Alex Young <alex@...> 2008/01/28

Jim Cropcho wrote:

[#15283] Re: a new kind of assertion — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/28

Alex Young wrote:

[#15285] Re: a new kind of assertion — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/01/28

Phlip wrote:

[#15284] Re: a new kind of assertion — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/01/28

@ Alex: I think that's exactly what we're talking about, although the scope

[#15294] Re: a new kind of assertion — Alex Young <alex@...> 2008/01/29

Jim Cropcho wrote:

[#15295] Re: a new kind of assertion — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/29

> I really like the assert_ idea, though.

[#15268] unsubscribe — Manu <mlist4manu@...>

1 message 2008/01/28

[#15279] Is "Regexp#ascii_only?" needed? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

Note the warning message in the following:

2 messages 2008/01/28

[#15281] Re: Is "Regexp#ascii_only?" needed? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/28

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15280] Personal CI tests passing again -- with workarounds applied — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

I mention this as I believe that the REXML that is present in the Ruby

1 message 2008/01/28

[#15288] Circular dependency: revision 15317 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

http://intertwingly.net/projects/ruby19/logs/ruby.html

6 messages 2008/01/29

[#15289] Re: Circular dependency: revision 15317 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/01/29

Sam Ruby wrote:

[#15290] Re: Circular dependency: revision 15317 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/29

NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#15291] Re: Circular dependency: revision 15317 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/01/29

Hello,

[#15292] Re: Circular dependency: revision 15317 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/01/29

Hi,

[#15293] Re: Circular dependency: revision 15317 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/01/29

NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#15297] Deletion of element sequence in an Array — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

7 messages 2008/01/29

[#15304] Re: Deletion of element sequence in an Array — "Gavin Kistner" <gavin.kistner@...> 2008/01/29

From: Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner [mailto:ed.odanow@wonado.de]

[#15305] Re: Deletion of element sequence in an Array — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/29

Gavin Kistner schrieb:

[#15298] Re: Deletion of element sequence in an Array — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/01/29

Hello,

[#15300] Re: Deletion of element sequence in an Array — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/01/29

U.Nakamura schrieb:

[#15301] Re: Deletion of element sequence in an Array — "Nikos Mouchtaris" <muhtaris@...> 2008/01/29

On 29/01/2008, Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wrote:

[#15302] Re: Deletion of element sequence in an Array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/01/29

Hi,

[#15303] Core team, I need your help — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/01/29

[#15314] Re: Core team, I need your help — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/30

>>>>> "J" == Jonas Pfenniger <zimbatm@oree.ch> writes:

[#15324] Re: Core team, I need your help — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2008/01/31

> Well, you have found the bug : it's completely described on rubyforge.

[#15325] Re: Core team, I need your help — ts <decoux@...> 2008/01/31

>>>>> "J" == Jonas Pfenniger <zimbatm@oree.ch> writes:

[#15308] IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Is there any documentation on the TNODE

8 messages 2008/01/30

[#15315] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/30

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:42:29PM +0900, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#15316] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/01/30

This is great! Should it be added to http://rubystuff.org/nodewrap/doc/ ?

[#15318] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/30

Rocky Bernstein wrote:

[#15317] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/01/30

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#15319] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/30

Charles Thornton wrote:

[#15322] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/01/31

Thanks Paul,

[#15607] Re: IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/02/19

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:42:29PM +0900, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#15309] 1.9 ri problem — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/01/30

[#15320] Re: 1.9 ri problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/30

[#15311] FileUtils#cp_r options — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...>

Why does FileUtils#cp_r have remove_destination as an option and not

1 message 2008/01/30

[#15312] RDoc would cause NameError — sheepman <sheepman@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/01/30

[#15323] Re: RDoc would cause NameError — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/01/31

sheepman! you exist! I've been googling for you!

[#15321] rev 15349-15353 #274 test_syntax.rb:527 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>

This change:

1 message 2008/01/31