From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2007-12-22T03:14:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up

Hi,

In message "Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up"
    on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:34:11 +0900, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> writes:

|1) Will Proc.binding be made to work in 1.9?

Just done.

|2) Will Kernel.__callee__ be implemented so it works as documented in 
|1.9?  If not, may I delete its rdoc comment?

Oh, it's yet another unaddressed issue.  I'd like to implement
__callee__ as it described, but I have to ask Koichi how to do it.
Stay tuned.

|3) Is the new enumerate-by-insertion order of Hash part of the language 
|specification or is it an implementation detail in MRI?  (Last time I 
|asked you said you'd see what the JRuby people thought about this.)

JRuby people did.  So I guess I can safely say it will be part of the
spec.  Other implementers, it's the last chance to say objection.

							matz.