From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2007-12-10T23:52:00+09:00
Subject: Re: redefineable not operator

Hi,

In message "Re: redefineable not operator"
    on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:52:44 +0900, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> writes:

|Are you feeling okay, Matz?

Fine, thank you.

|But on a more pressing note, may I ask if more problematic issues are
|being looked at too -- in light of the pending release? For instance,
|I've not heard if the autoload issue, I've mentioned before, is being
|addressed --that bug is a BIG DEAL for me. And there appears to be a
|many other important issues listed in Tracker (though granted, I can't
|really judge their merits).

Maybe, _I_ am having problem with issue tracking.  Could you point me
the reference again?

|Okay... I guess this is one of those "please no new features; fix the
|bugs we got" requests ;-)

I consider myself in "feature polishing" mode now.  I know you might
think it's too late.  I think it's better than having unsophisticated
1.9.

For good news, I have no big change left.

							matz.