From: Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Date: 2007-12-13T15:38:05+09:00
Subject: Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)

Dave Thomas wrote:
> 
> On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> 
>> ruby_parser is pure ruby, so that should be ok, but I'm not clear what 
>> 1.9's parser output has to do with eliminating the dependency on IRB. 
>> We expose JRuby AST (plus comment nodes) directly if someone really 
>> wants to use it, but we strongly advise against depending on the AST 
>> structure in any way since it changes over time.
> 
> 
> Actually, I wasn't talking about removing the irb dependency--there 
> isn't one, because I copied the code in and hacked it (a lot). I was 
> simply suggesting removing the e2mmap dependency in rdoc.

Ahh, ok...I understand what you mean now.

- Charlie