[#13842] Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding. — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
The below is a little long. So here's a summary.
11 messages
2007/12/01
[#13847] Re: Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding.
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/02
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#13850] Re: Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding.
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2007/12/03
[#13857] Re: Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding.
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/03
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#13858] Re: Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding.
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2007/12/03
[#13860] Re: Better introspection for Frames, Thread, and enhancing binding.
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/03
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#13851] Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear — "Voroztsov Artem" <artem.voroztsov@...>
I encountered problem with Array#flatten slowness (it can be much
19 messages
2007/12/03
[#13863] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/03
Voroztsov Artem wrote:
[#13867] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— "Voroztsov Artem" <artem.voroztsov@...>
2007/12/03
2007/12/3, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com>:
[#13868] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— "Voroztsov Artem" <artem.voroztsov@...>
2007/12/03
2007/12/3, Voroztsov Artem <artem.voroztsov@gmail.com>:
[#13870] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
2007/12/03
Hi,
[#13876] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/12/04
Hi,
[#13877] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
2007/12/04
2007/12/4, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#13878] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/12/04
Hi,
[#13888] Re: Array#flatten works quadratic time on length of resulting array. It could be linear
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/06
Hi,
[#13854] A little concern about m17n — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com>
I know it's kinda late to make any changes to the 1.9 roadmap, so I'm
5 messages
2007/12/03
[#13885] Idea: always yield current thread to Thread.new — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2007/12/05
[#13887] Can we foresee any big changes for Ruby in year 2008? — "Song Ma" <songmash@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2007/12/06
[#13889] Continuations on dead threads crash 1.8.6 and 1.6.8 — Brent Roman <brent@...>
5 messages
2007/12/06
[#13893] How to have fine grain control over GL in C extensions — hemant <gethemant@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2007/12/06
[#13909] Re: How to have fine grain control over GL in C extensions
— hemant <gethemant@...>
2007/12/07
On Dec 6, 2007 6:35 PM, hemant <gethemant@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13897] issue with Date class freeze — "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...>
Hello all,
6 messages
2007/12/07
[#13903] Clarification of retry change — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Matz confirmed that retry-outside-rescue will no longer work, but I
14 messages
2007/12/07
[#13905] Re: Clarification of retry change
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2007/12/07
Hi,
[#13906] Re: Clarification of retry change
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/07
SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#13925] Re: Clarification of retry change
— "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...>
2007/12/07
On Dec 7, 2007 12:48 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13930] Re: Clarification of retry change
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/07
Brian Mitchell wrote:
[#13908] What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows? — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
20 messages
2007/12/07
[#13913] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/12/07
Hi,
[#13914] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/07
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#13926] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2007/12/07
T24gRGVjIDcsIDIwMDcgODoyMSBBTSwgR29uemFsbyBHYXJyYW11w7FvIDxnZ2FycmFAYWR2YW5j
[#14038] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— "Joe Swatosh" <joe.swatosh@...>
2007/12/12
Hi Luis
[#14039] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2007/12/12
On Dec 12, 2007 4:05 PM, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com> wrote:
[#14040] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
2007/12/12
> This was discussed in other thread in ruby-talk, but just to summarize:
[#14046] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/12/13
Hi,
[#14061] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— "Joe Swatosh" <joe.swatosh@...>
2007/12/13
On Dec 12, 2007 5:00 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#14060] Re: [Spam] Re: What's the status of compiler/compiling on windows?
— "Joe Swatosh" <joe.swatosh@...>
2007/12/13
On Dec 12, 2007 1:55 PM, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13916] Changes in C API of Ruby 1.9 — hemant <gethemant@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2007/12/07
[#13920] Re: Changes in C API of Ruby 1.9
— "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
2007/12/07
> -----Original Message-----
[#13961] Error while bulding Ruby 1.9 from snapshot 2007/12/09 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
9 messages
2007/12/09
[#13969] redefineable not operator — David Flanagan <david@...>
Matz,
37 messages
2007/12/10
[#13971] Re: redefineable not operator
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/10
David Flanagan wrote:
[#13972] Re: redefineable not operator
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/10
Hi,
[#14007] Re: redefineable not operator
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/11
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#14011] Re: redefineable not operator
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/11
Hi,
[#14013] Re: redefineable not operator
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/12
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#14016] Re: redefineable not operator
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/12
murphy wrote:
[#14019] Re: redefineable not operator
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/12
Hi,
[#14024] Re: redefineable not operator
— Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
2007/12/12
[#14029] Re: redefineable not operator
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/12
[#14031] Re: redefineable not operator
— Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
2007/12/12
[#14032] Re: redefineable not operator
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/12
[#13989] Compliment to rb_thread_blocking_region() ? — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>
The rb_thread_blocking_region() appears to allow releasing the GIL and
6 messages
2007/12/10
[#13992] Re: Compliment to rb_thread_blocking_region() ?
— MenTaLguY <mental@...>
2007/12/10
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:41:56 +0900, "Tony Arcieri" <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:
[#13994] Re: Compliment to rb_thread_blocking_region() ?
— "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>
2007/12/10
On Dec 10, 2007 3:49 PM, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
[#13997] Output of "ruby --help" looks not correct for Ruby 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Good morning!
3 messages
2007/12/11
[#13998] Array#pack and String#unpack documentation — "Gary Wright" <radar2002@...>
In working with Array#pack and String#unpack today, I found
9 messages
2007/12/11
[#14003] Re: Array#pack and String#unpack documentation
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/11
Hi,
[#14005] Re: Array#pack and String#unpack documentation
— Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
2007/12/11
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#14042] Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
E2MM.Raise complains about $! being read-only now, and E2MM is used by
22 messages
2007/12/13
[#14043] Re: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/13
[#14049] RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/12/13
On Dec 12, 2007, at 16:19 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#14052] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/13
[#14056] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/13
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#14058] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/13
[#14067] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)
— Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
2007/12/13
Hello Dave,
[#14074] Re: RDoc + irb (Was: Fix e2mmap.rb for 1.9)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/13
[#14083] multibyte characters in curses — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello,
5 messages
2007/12/14
[#14086] attr_accessor for question methods (?) — Trans <transfire@...>
Like to make a small suggestion for 1.9. It would be great if we could
8 messages
2007/12/14
[#14102] Small (hopefully) problem with RDoc (Ruby 1.9) — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Good morning!
5 messages
2007/12/14
[#14103] Re: Small (hopefully) problem with RDoc (Ruby 1.9)
— Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
2007/12/14
I made some tests, unfortunately the debugger crashed, so I
[#14111] What does volatile assignment of *pos in rb_thread_s_new() do? — Brent Roman <brent@...>
3 messages
2007/12/15
[#14118] Enumerable#uniq, anybody? — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have just tried to use zip followed by uniq in a 1.9 context.
6 messages
2007/12/17
[#14123] Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up — David Flanagan <david@...>
Matz,
20 messages
2007/12/17
[#14220] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/21
Hi,
[#14238] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/22
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#14242] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2007/12/22
Hi,
[#14245] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/22
SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#14126] Curious warning with IO.popen on Windows — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
4 messages
2007/12/17
[#14130] Another last-minute Ruby 1.9 question — David Flanagan <david@...>
Here's another last-minute question, probably for Matz or Nobu...
4 messages
2007/12/18
[#14139] String#% bug on Windows? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
8 messages
2007/12/18
[#14140] rest argument able to duplicate/replace local argument bug? — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>
This is a bug right?
5 messages
2007/12/18
[#14147] named captures assigning to local variables — David Flanagan <david@...>
I've just been browsing ruby-dev. For an english speaker, it is kind of
26 messages
2007/12/19
[#14150] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/19
In article <47686B87.7050609@davidflanagan.com>,
[#14158] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— david@...
2007/12/19
Thank you for the clarification, akr. I'm embarassed to say that it didn't
[#14161] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/20
If I may, have a proposal. My apologies if this has already been
[#14162] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2007/12/20
David Flanagan wrote:
[#14170] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/20
In article <476A087E.3070000@davidflanagan.com>,
[#14172] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/20
How about making the return value an array of the captured strings, or nil
[#14181] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/20
In article <S2445477AbXLTQsI/20071220164808Z+24367@swip003.ftl.affinity.com>,
[#14183] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/20
Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#14184] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/20
Attached is a variation on my patch that makes it return $~ instead of
[#14201] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2007/12/21
Hi --
[#14222] Re: named captures assigning to local variables
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/21
David A. Black wrote:
[#14149] Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Brent Roman <brent@...>
The attached patch against Ruby 1.8.6-p110 improves the performance of
38 messages
2007/12/19
[#14202] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/21
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14257] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/22
[#14266] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/22
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14274] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2007/12/22
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:25PM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#14276] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/22
Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
[#14450] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2007/12/26
> The rule of thumb is basically this: don't allow changing the path of a
[#14463] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/26
Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
[#14466] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2007/12/26
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 01:57:22AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#14472] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/26
Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
[#14278] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
2007/12/22
[#14301] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/23
[#14458] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/26
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14490] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/27
[#14504] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/27
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14570] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/29
[#14574] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/29
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14619] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/31
[#14625] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/31
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14175] xmlrpc/client ssl client auth — Jeremy Thurgood <jerith@...>
Good day,
4 messages
2007/12/20
[#14186] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>
Just a heads up here. I've added Rake (version 0.8.0 ... the latest)
34 messages
2007/12/21
[#14205] Re: Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/21
Jim Weirich wrote:
[#14210] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/21
Jim Weirich wrote:
[#14213] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
2007/12/21
On Dec 21, 2007 10:24 AM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wr=
[#14215] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>
2007/12/21
[#14217] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/21
Jim Weirich wrote:
[#14218] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/21
[#14226] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
2007/12/21
On Dec 21, 2007 12:28 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#14227] Re: [Spam] Rake 0.8.0 added to Ruby
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2007/12/21
On Dec 21, 2007 9:06 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
[#14203] Re: Problem with case statements — hemant kumar <gethemant@...>
4 messages
2007/12/21
[#14224] Status of two issues — Trans <transfire@...>
Will the #autoload require issue be addressed?
10 messages
2007/12/21
[#14261] Re: Status of two issues
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/12/22
Hi,
[#14263] Re: Status of two issues
— Trans <transfire@...>
2007/12/22
[#14237] io.c patch for two encodings in file mode — David Flanagan <david@...>
The attached patch adds support for filemodes like "r:utf-8:iso-8859-15"
7 messages
2007/12/21
[#14251] Semantics of caller (was Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
On Dec 21, 2007 8:56 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com>
4 messages
2007/12/22
[#14259] Re: Semantics of caller (was Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/22
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#14280] Block-local variables - obsolete? — murphy <murphy@...>
hello!
8 messages
2007/12/22
[#14282] Re: Block-local variables - obsolete?
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/22
Only block parameters are now always local to the block; variables
[#14283] Re: Block-local variables - obsolete?
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/22
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#14285] Re: Block-local variables - obsolete?
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2007/12/23
[#14286] Why is Array not Comparable — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I just bumped into this:
7 messages
2007/12/23
[#14360] Re: Why is Array not Comparable
— Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
2007/12/24
At 10:40 07/12/23, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#14303] IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
While working on Chapter 05 and referencing various works
23 messages
2007/12/23
[#14308] Re: IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation?
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2007/12/23
[#14309] Re: IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation?
— Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
2007/12/23
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#14322] Re: IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation?
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2007/12/23
[#14347] Re: IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation?
— Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
2007/12/24
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#14335] Many external symbols _without_ prefix in libruby object file — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp>
Hi all,
12 messages
2007/12/23
[#14364] RDoc: [FATAL] failed to allocate memory — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
With revision 14590, I suddenly get an error when I do "make install"
13 messages
2007/12/24
[#14365] Re: RDoc: [FATAL] failed to allocate memory
— "Daniele Alessandri" <suppakilla@...>
2007/12/24
On Dec 24, 2007 9:51 AM, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
[#14367] replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
15 messages
2007/12/24
[#14390] Re: replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb
— James Gray <james@...>
2007/12/24
On Dec 24, 2007, at 3:34 AM, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#14391] Re: replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb
— James Gray <james@...>
2007/12/24
On Dec 24, 2007, at 1:16 PM, James Gray wrote:
[#14626] Re: replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/31
James Gray wrote:
[#14378] module_eval change between ruby1.8 & ruby 1.9. Is it intentional ? — Frederick Cheung <frederick.cheung@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2007/12/24
[#14389] pre-release note for the christmas release. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2007/12/24
[#14398] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Sometimes Timeout.timeout expires early. I see this with `gem
7 messages
2007/12/25
[#14399] Re: [PATCH] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/12/25
On Dec 24, 2007, at 16:36 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#14400] Re: [PATCH] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/12/25
On Dec 24, 2007, at 17:14 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#14418] Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0 — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>
Just re-built latest svn of 1.9.0 and base64.rb is removed. Its
51 messages
2007/12/25
[#14420] Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/12/25
On Dec 25, 2007, at 07:03 AM, Richard Kilmer wrote:
[#14427] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2007/12/25
Eric Hodel wrote:
[#14431] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/25
[#14446] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/12/26
On Dec 25, 2007, at 13:35 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#14452] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/26
[#14492] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/12/27
On Dec 26, 2007, at 06:16 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#14494] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/27
[#14503] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Richard Kilmer <rich@...>
2007/12/27
[#14505] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/27
Richard Kilmer wrote:
[#14513] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2007/12/27
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#14429] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— hemant <gethemant@...>
2007/12/25
On Dec 26, 2007 1:01 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#14430] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2007/12/25
hemant wrote:
[#14432] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/25
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#14459] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/26
Gonzalo Garramu wrote:
[#14460] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2007/12/26
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#14461] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
— Frederick Cheung <frederick.cheung@...>
2007/12/26
[#14440] Odd situation with mingw, readline and readline tests. — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Hello again,
4 messages
2007/12/26
[#14497] Status of Event Driven Network Programming Libraries in 1.9 — hemant <gethemant@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2007/12/27
[#14501] Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
Having seen several posts on various ruby related forum from folks who
8 messages
2007/12/27
[#14515] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2007/12/27
Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#14521] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/28
[#14522] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
— Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
2007/12/28
Dave Thomas schrieb:
[#14523] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2007/12/28
[#14541] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
— "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
2007/12/28
On Dec 27, 2007 8:37 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#14517] Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello,
12 messages
2007/12/27
[#14533] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/28
In article <7CE19CBC-71C5-48FE-A2E7-4FCE489A7090@gmail.com>,
[#14535] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
— Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
2007/12/28
[#14536] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/28
In article <A389041B-BC9F-409F-80B4-09971F62B7DE@gmail.com>,
[#14538] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
— Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
2007/12/28
[#14539] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/28
In article <945DBEDA-10F1-40D0-AF7E-CF82EFF627AC@gmail.com>,
[#14524] Zlib::Inflate changes to net/http.rb — Filipe Lautert <filipe@...>
4 messages
2007/12/28
[#14549] multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0 — khaines@...
Like everyone else, I've been testing my stuff under 1.9.0. In general,
38 messages
2007/12/28
[#14560] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/28
[#14573] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/29
Brent Roman wrote:
[#14603] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2007/12/30
[#14617] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/12/31
In article <14544702.post@talk.nabble.com>,
[#14631] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
2007/12/31
Hello Akira,
[#14657] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2008/01/01
In article <6.0.0.20.2.20071231173234.0a28c170@localhost>,
[#14659] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>
2008/01/01
[#14711] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
2008/01/03
At 01:54 08/01/02, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#14729] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
2008/01/03
On Jan 3, 2008 1:04 AM, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
[#14730] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
2008/01/03
After reading this thread, and looking at the the title, let me make
[#14731] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
— khaines@...
2008/01/03
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#14550] Ruby 1.9 and Unicode — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
I've tried porting a few small codebases, and a few experiments, and
8 messages
2007/12/28
[#14552] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/12/28
Sam Ruby wrote:
[#14554] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
— Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
2007/12/28
David Flanagan wrote:
[#14557] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
— "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>
2007/12/28
> As well an explanation of the differences between the following two
[#14555] module_eval oddness on 1.9 — Frederick Cheung <frederick.cheung@...>
4 messages
2007/12/28
[#14564] locale in ruby — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello
11 messages
2007/12/29
[#14654] Re: locale in ruby
— Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
2008/01/01
At 07:55 07/12/30, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#14656] Re: locale in ruby
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2008/01/01
In article <6.0.0.20.2.20071231200106.0b1bfb00@localhost>,
[#14662] Re: locale in ruby
— Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
2008/01/01
At 14:17 08/01/01, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#14568] Layout of includes in ruby 1.9 — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
19 messages
2007/12/29
[#14576] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
2007/12/29
On Dec 29, 2007 2:39 AM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wro=
[#14578] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
2007/12/29
Hello,
[#14583] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/29
U.Nakamura wrote:
[#14587] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— ts <decoux@...>
2007/12/29
>>>>> "G" == Gonzalo Garramu=F1o?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
[#14588] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/29
ts wrote:
[#14589] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— ts <decoux@...>
2007/12/29
>>>>> "G" == Gonzalo Garramu=F1o?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
[#14591] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/29
ts wrote:
[#14569] Wide strings to ruby strings — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
11 messages
2007/12/29
[#14582] Re: Wide strings to ruby strings
— "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
2007/12/29
On Dec 29, 2007 2:58 AM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wro=
[#14593] Re: [Spam] Re: Wide strings to ruby strings
— Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...>
2007/12/29
Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#14602] RCR allow indexing last n items — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello
15 messages
2007/12/30
[#14609] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2007/12/30
Hi --
[#14610] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
2007/12/30
On 30/12/2007, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#14616] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2007/12/30
Hi --
[#14640] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
2007/12/31
On 31/12/2007, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#14648] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2007/12/31
Hi --
[#14665] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
2008/01/01
On 31/12/2007, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#14668] Re: RCR allow indexing last n items
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/01/01
Hi --
[#14621] Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...>
Hello!
21 messages
2007/12/31
[#14622] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— "Cheah Chu Yeow" <chuyeow@...>
2007/12/31
This looks like a related bug with passing block arguments to
[#14633] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— murphy <murphy@...>
2007/12/31
Cheah Chu Yeow wrote:
[#14716] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/01/03
Hi,
[#14726] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/01/03
>>>>> "S" == SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> writes:
[#14728] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/01/03
Hi,
[#16093] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...>
2008/04/01
Hi,
[#16094] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/04/01
Jeremy Kemper wrote:
[#16187] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2008/04/04
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:43:34PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#16190] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/04/04
Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
[#16259] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2008/04/07
About bug [#19304]
[#16268] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/04/08
Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
[#16270] Re: Module.new(&block) in Ruby 1.9
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2008/04/08
> > Finally, I'm not sure my last mail actually reached the list. Guy: I
[#14639] Rexml and Ruby 1.9 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
Ticket: http://www.germane-software.com/projects/rexml/ticket/131
5 messages
2007/12/31
Re: io.c patch for two encodings in file mode
From:
David Flanagan <david@...>
Date:
2007-12-22 00:05:56 UTC
List:
ruby-core #14240
This is another verison of the patch, with a couple of riskier (because I don't understand what I'm doing as well) changes to binmode handling. They fix the behavior of getc for me. (getc was returning unicode characters even when a file was opened "rb" or binmode() was called on it. I think that was incorrect.) David
Attachments (1)
iopatch2
(4.37 KB, text/x-diff)
Index: include/ruby/io.h
===================================================================
--- include/ruby/io.h (revision 14446)
+++ include/ruby/io.h (working copy)
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
int rbuf_capa;
VALUE tied_io_for_writing;
rb_encoding *enc;
+ rb_encoding *enc2;
} rb_io_t;
#define HAVE_RB_IO_T 1
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@
fp->rbuf_capa = 0;\
fp->tied_io_for_writing = 0;\
fp->enc = 0;\
+ fp->enc2 = 0;\
} while (0)
FILE *rb_io_stdio_file(rb_io_t *fptr);
Index: io.c
===================================================================
--- io.c (revision 14446)
+++ io.c (working copy)
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
static VALUE argf;
-static ID id_write, id_read, id_getc, id_flush;
+static ID id_write, id_read, id_getc, id_flush, id_encode;
extern char *ruby_inplace_mode;
@@ -622,6 +622,26 @@
{
long len, n, r, l, offset = 0;
+ /*
+ * If an external encoding was specified and it differs from
+ * the strings encoding then we must transcode before writing.
+ * We must also transcode if two encodings were specified
+ */
+ if (fptr->enc && (fptr->enc2 || fptr->enc != rb_enc_get(str))) {
+ /* transcode str before output */
+ /* the methods in transcode.c are static, so call indirectly */
+ /* Can't use encode! because puts writes a frozen newline */
+ if (fptr->enc2) {
+ str = rb_funcall(str, id_encode, 2,
+ rb_enc_from_encoding(fptr->enc),
+ rb_enc_from_encoding(fptr->enc2));
+ }
+ else {
+ str = rb_funcall(str, id_encode, 1,
+ rb_enc_from_encoding(fptr->enc));
+ }
+ }
+
len = RSTRING_LEN(str);
if ((n = len) <= 0) return n;
if (fptr->wbuf == NULL && !(fptr->mode & FMODE_SYNC)) {
@@ -1279,7 +1299,17 @@
{
OBJ_TAINT(str);
if (fptr->enc) {
- rb_enc_associate(str, fptr->enc);
+ if (fptr->enc2) {
+ /* two encodings, so transcode from enc2 to enc */
+ /* the methods in transcode.c are static, so call indirectly */
+ str = rb_funcall(str, id_encode, 2,
+ rb_enc_from_encoding(fptr->enc2),
+ rb_enc_from_encoding(fptr->enc));
+ }
+ else {
+ /* just one encoding, so associate it with the string */
+ rb_enc_associate(str, fptr->enc);
+ }
}
return str;
}
@@ -2878,11 +2908,11 @@
static VALUE
rb_io_binmode_m(VALUE io)
{
+ rb_io_binmode(io);
+
#if defined(_WIN32) || defined(DJGPP) || defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__human68k__) || defined(__EMX__)
VALUE write_io;
- rb_io_binmode(io);
-
write_io = GetWriteIO(io);
if (write_io != io)
rb_io_binmode(write_io);
@@ -3063,7 +3093,8 @@
rb_io_mode_enc(rb_io_t *fptr, const char *mode)
{
const char *p0, *p1;
- int idx;
+ char *enc2name;
+ int idx, idx2;
p0 = strrchr(mode, ':');
if (p0) {
@@ -3071,13 +3102,31 @@
if (idx >= 0) {
fptr->enc = rb_enc_from_index(idx);
}
-#if 0
+ else {
+ rb_warn("Unsupported encoding %s ignored", p0+1);
+ }
p1 = strchr(mode, ':');
if (p1 < p0) {
+ enc2name = ALLOCA_N(char, p0-p1);
+ strncpy(enc2name, p1+1, p0-p1-1);
+ enc2name[p0-p1-1] = '\0';
+ idx2=rb_enc_find_index(enc2name);
+ if (idx2 == idx) {
+ rb_warn("Ignoring internal encoding %s: it is identical to external encoding %s",
+ enc2name, p0+1);
+ }
+ else if (idx2 >= 0) {
+ fptr->enc2 = rb_enc_from_index(idx2);
+ }
+ else {
+ rb_warn("Unsupported encoding %s ignored", enc2name);
+ }
}
-#endif
}
- else if (!(fptr->mode & FMODE_BINMODE)) {
+ else if (fptr->mode & FMODE_BINMODE) {
+ fptr->enc = rb_ascii_encoding();
+ }
+ else {
fptr->enc = rb_default_external_encoding();
}
}
@@ -5703,6 +5752,11 @@
return rb_enc_from_encoding(fptr->enc);
}
+static VALUE
+argf_external_encoding(void)
+{
+ return rb_enc_default_external();
+}
static VALUE
argf_tell(void)
@@ -6155,6 +6209,7 @@
id_read = rb_intern("read");
id_getc = rb_intern("getc");
id_flush = rb_intern("flush");
+ id_encode = rb_intern("encode");
rb_define_global_function("syscall", rb_f_syscall, -1);
@@ -6339,6 +6394,8 @@
rb_define_singleton_method(argf, "lineno", argf_lineno, 0);
rb_define_singleton_method(argf, "lineno=", argf_set_lineno, 1);
+ rb_define_singleton_method(argf, "external_encoding", argf_external_encoding, 0);
+
rb_global_variable(¤t_file);
rb_define_readonly_variable("$FILENAME", &filename);
filename = rb_str_new2("-");