[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: FTP, mostly questions, but a patch, too.

From: "Warren Brown" <warrenbrown@...>
Date: 2005-05-25 15:48:25 UTC
List: ruby-core #5097
Hugh,

> I was looking at RFC959 -- the FTP spec,
> So, the other thing it says about modes is that RETRy won't
> work in Stream mode, and Stream mode is the default mode.
> So, I look it the Ruby ftp file.  I see no support for MODE,
> but I see support for RETR.  Is this actually correct if
> Stream is the default?  I do see a reference to MDTM, which
> I can't see in RFC959, so I'm not sure what that is, and if
> it has something to do with MoDe of TransMission.  I also
> see an EPRT command which I don't recognise either.

    First of all, note that FTP is a very "loose" protocol with lots of
nonstandard but widely-used extensions.  Although RFC959 is the base for
the FTP protocol, many other RFCs should also be considered.  Some of
the main ones are: RFC1123, RFC1579, RFC2228, RFC2389, RFC2428, RFC2640,
as well as several IETF drafts.

    As far as the RETR command, you have misread RFC959.  RETR is the
"RETRieve" command.  It is the command issued when you "GET" a file.
What you are describing is the REST ("RESTart") command.

   In practice, virtually nobody uses anything but stream mode for FTP
communications, and currently one of the major problems with FTP
communications is the lack of a restart command that works with stream
mode.  This is addressed by IETF draft "Extensions to FTP", which
extends the REST command to include stream mode, but not very many FTP
clients or servers currently support this.  That same draft is also
trying to standardize the widely-used MDTM ("MoDification TiMe") command
that you ran across.  The EPRT ("Extended PoRT") command is the IPv6
version of the PORT command and is described by RFC2428.

    I hope this helps.

    - Warren Brown




In This Thread

Prev Next