[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure

From: Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...>
Date: 2005-05-15 03:14:14 UTC
List: ruby-core #4998
Hi,

On 5/14/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:
> nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Sun, 15 May 2005 06:00:47 +0900,
> > Ilias Lazaridis wrote in [ruby-core:04991]:
> >
> >>the neccessity of the change is undoubtable given.
> >
> > I consider it just unnecessary.
> 
> It is your right to be an amateur.

What are you trying to do? A denial of service attack? :-) That has to
be the most torturous and painful way of doing it. Can't you spare all
the rest of the world from your insights? It's one thing to own an
internet connection, it's another to abuse it.

The minimum Ruby that you want would suck. There isn't such a thing as
a minimum Ruby. At least I think 99.9% of the Ruby users use it in its
entirety. You first want the developers to create a custom Ruby for
you. Then you would want them to add the remaining bits to make it
usable for you. Etc. It's too much work to waste doing it for you,
even though you could say that it would be good for the 99.9% of the
users that don't care about it.

Please, Ruby people, raise your anti-DDoS shields. :-)

Cheers,
Joao


In This Thread