[#5219] Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2005/06/16
[#5220] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/06/16

[#5221] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...> 2005/06/16

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:03:18 +0900

[#5223] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2005/06/17

Hi,

[#5296] Subversion — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

64 messages 2005/06/30
[#5297] Re: Subversion — Curt Hibbs <curt@...> 2005/06/30

Shugo Maeda wrote:

[#5298] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/06/30

Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#5301] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull

[#5304] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/06/30

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5305] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull

[#5307] Re: Subversion — mathew <meta@...> 2005/06/30

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5308] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5311] Re: Subversion — mathew <meta@...> 2005/07/01

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5323] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/01

On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5325] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/01

Austin Ziegler wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Silly bug in 1.8's YAML

From: Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Date: 2005-06-07 18:58:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #5171
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-06-08 00:13]:
> In message "Re: [PATCH] Silly bug in 1.8's YAML"
>     on Fri, 20 May 2005 03:38:00 +0900, Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> writes:
> 
> |Ruby 1.8's YAML will use the "new" method to instantiate objects, but it
> |should use "allocate" instead. Otherwise, there might be trouble with
> |new/initialize that take arguments.
> 
> Thank you.  I will merge this.  By the way, I think you need to
> replace new by allocate in one other place (in hash_proc), right?

I didn't notice this before. Yes, it looks like the same change should
be made at that line, too.

> |This is fixed in Ruby 1.9/Syck CVS, but I think it should go in 1.8,
> |too.
> 
> I don't see it's fixed in 1.9.  Do I have to update rubytypes.rb in
> the HEAD as well?

Sorry, I think I just checked whether it was in Syck CVS.

Regards,
Tilman

-- 
learn to quote: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

In This Thread

Prev Next