[#5143] Win32API segfault in 1.8.3p1 — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
I'm on Windows XP, using VC7 to compile. I've previously gotten a good
Hi,
[#5151] COPY and INSTALL on Windows — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
1.8.3p1 has changed the defaults for the COPY and INSTALL Makefile
[#5152] 1.8.3 p1 segfault in array.c- bccwin32 - bcc5.5 (free) compiler bug — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
[#5160] Alternative for win32\ifchange.bat — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
[#5179] Cannot build HEAD on OS X 10.4.1 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Somehow the rb_fd_init macro is conflicting with the definition of
Hi,
Hi,
[#5188] Re: IO#read — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#5190] Resolv and TTL — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I would like to retrieve the TTL values from Resolv, but they seem to
[#5206] Object#inspect() doesn't return; uses 100% cpu — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
Is this something I could have caused by overriding some method on the
[#5211] ruby 1.8 CVS do not work with --enable-pthread configure option — noreply@...
Bugs item #2038, was opened at 2005-06-16 13:57
[#5215] Hackers Guide Translation Request! — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
I have recently discovered RUBY and want to understand it a deep level -
[#5219] Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...>
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:03:18 +0900
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:51:07 +0900
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:28:53 +0900
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:05:56 +0900
[#5233] event_hook shows weirdness when invoked on mixed in methods — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
The following attachment, when run, shows the following behavior:
[#5264] XMLRPC vulnerabilities? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've just seen this (by RSS)
[#5267] RubyUnit Test Ordering — Jordan Gilliland <jordan@...>
I'm using ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i686-linux] and I've noticed that the
[#5277] Macros in win32.h — james@...
win32.h defines a load of macros. This means any C or C++ program which embeds
[#5288] committing rdoc additions corrections to head? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
There is some discussion on ruby-doc about people documenting core
[#5296] Subversion — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
Shugo Maeda wrote:
Curt Hibbs wrote:
On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 6/30/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 7/1/05, Nikolai Weibull
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Thursday 30 June 2005 19:19, mathew wrote:
"Sean E. Russell" <ser@germane-software.com> writes:
On 30 Jun 2005, at 08:19, Shugo Maeda wrote:
Hi,
Re: Subversion
On 6/30/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
> Austin Ziegler wrote:
>> Cygwin is not an answer. Ever.
>>
>> Sorry, but that's a lazy answer. If there's not a native port to
>> a chosen platform, then the platform is unsupported.
> You mean there are people who run Windows *without* cygwin?
> *shudder*
I have Cygwin, but only to allow the Linux boxes that I develop on
as well to connect to with X. I don't do the cygwin command-line,
because it's 100x less efficient than what I *do* use.
> Look, nobody's saying you should need to use cygwin to run Ruby
> itself. I really don't see the big deal between running your
> source code checkin/checkout commands in a cygwin shell, vs
> running the same thing in a Windows shell. It'll look and work
> exactly the same.
No, it won't. It's also an additional umpteen-megabyte installation
that is a royal pain in the ass. In any case, I do all of my CVS and
Subversion work directly from TortoiseCVS and TortoiseSVN -- GUI
interfaces that make these as easy to use as Perforce and ClearCase,
and millions of times easier than the command-line tools.
> Well, except that with cygwin you'll get proper command line
> editing, completion and history... But you don't *have* to use
> those if you don't want.
You know what? I *have* proper command-line editing, completion, and
history. This isn't 1995, and if you've not used cmd.exe since 2002,
you don't know what you're talking about. The cygwin terminal is
bloated and slow in comparison, and it overlays a different
filesystem on top of the existing Windows filesystem. Not only that,
I only generally drop into cmd.exe to run certain commands
repeatedly -- I use TotalCommander (think mc but tons better) as my
central application -- including as my interface to TortoiseSVN and
TortoiseSVN.
So no, Cygwin isn't acceptable in the least. It's be a step
backwards. And anyone who says otherwise does *not* know what
they're talking about when it comes to being efficient on Windows.
-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca