[#5219] Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2005/06/16
[#5220] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/06/16

[#5221] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...> 2005/06/16

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:03:18 +0900

[#5223] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2005/06/17

Hi,

[#5296] Subversion — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

64 messages 2005/06/30
[#5297] Re: Subversion — Curt Hibbs <curt@...> 2005/06/30

Shugo Maeda wrote:

[#5298] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/06/30

Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#5301] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull

[#5304] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/06/30

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5305] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull

[#5307] Re: Subversion — mathew <meta@...> 2005/06/30

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5308] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5311] Re: Subversion — mathew <meta@...> 2005/07/01

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5323] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/01

On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5325] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/01

Austin Ziegler wrote:

Re: committing rdoc additions corrections to head?

From: James Britt <ruby@...>
Date: 2005-06-30 02:19:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #5291
Eric Hodel wrote:
> 
> On 29 Jun 2005, at 17:10, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> In message "Re: committing rdoc additions corrections to head?"
>>     on Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:54:48 +0900, Ryan Davis <ryand- 
>> ruby@zenspider.com> writes:
>>
>> |There is some discussion on ruby-doc about people documenting core
>> |libraries and sending patch requests to the owners and not getting a
>> |response. Would anyone mind if I took point, reviewed said patches,
>> |and then committed them to head?
>>
>> No.  Go ahead to update documents.
> 
> 
> Can we get these backported to 1.8 as well as appropriate so they can  
> go into 1.8.3?

What would be the best CVS command for getting the most recent version 
of 1.8 for rebuilding rdoc files?  I want to automate a fetch and 
rdoc-generation build process so that ruby-doc.org can show the most 
current docs applicable to the current release.

James




In This Thread