[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
--- Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull
Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5388] Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...>
I recently installed PGP 9.0 on my Windows XP SP2 machine. At that point,
[#5391] Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Since Rexexp#=~ and String#=~ return nil if they fail to match,
Hi,
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5409] socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>
If I am reading s_recvfrom correctly in can throw an error which kills
[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!
Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!
Hi,
The MD5 sum is 53d1bde4542365caf4849c56e6274617.
Hi,
On 7/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[#5445] GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
I have found that the performance of current garbage collector
[#5451] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2101, was opened at 2005-07-14 15:30
[#5470] Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5471] make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>
hi all,
[#5476] Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:11:34AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5492] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — noreply@...
Bugs item #2131, was opened at 2005-07-19 17:34
Re: Subversion
Christian Neukirchen wrote: > Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@rawuncut.elitemail.org> writes: > > >>My point is this: Switching to Subversion is a poor choice, as it >>doesn't go far away enough from the CVS way of version control. There >>are better alternatives on the way, and there's no need to rush to the >>other choice to CVS right now, before the market has stabilized a bit. >>Lately it seems that everyone is writing a version control system, and >>hopefully someone will manage to come up with a really good system that >>will use many brilliant ideas, like the web service you hint at, and >>great portability. > > >>Anyway, to sum it up, I think that now is a bad time to switch to >>another version control system, as there's a lot going on at the moment, > > > Full ACK. Thank you for the first reasonable post in this thread. That assumes that you *want* to go "far away" from the CVS model of version control. My personal opinion is that it is a good model with a flawed (or incomplete) implementation. The aim of Subversion is to remedy those flaws, and goes along way towards doing so. Curt