[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift
24 messages
2005/07/01
[#5338] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
2005/07/02
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5348] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/02
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5357] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
2005/07/03
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5359] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/03
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5361] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
2005/07/03
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5362] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/03
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5365] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/07/04
Hi,
[#5367] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/04
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5368] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/07/04
Hi,
[#5372] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Florian Gro<florgro@...>
2005/07/04
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5375] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/04
--- Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#5379] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
2005/07/04
Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5380] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/04
--- Nikolai Weibull
[#5381] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
— Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
2005/07/04
Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5388] Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...>
I recently installed PGP 9.0 on my Windows XP SP2 machine. At that point,
5 messages
2005/07/05
[#5391] Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Since Rexexp#=~ and String#=~ return nil if they fail to match,
12 messages
2005/07/06
[#5396] Re: Object#=~
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/07/06
Hi,
[#5397] Re: Object#=~
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2005/07/06
[#5401] Re: Object#=~
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/07/06
Hi,
[#5402] Re: Object#=~
— Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
2005/07/06
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5409] socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>
If I am reading s_recvfrom correctly in can throw an error which kills
4 messages
2005/07/07
[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!
15 messages
2005/07/11
[#5424] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2005/07/12
Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!
[#5425] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/07/12
Hi,
[#5426] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2005/07/12
The MD5 sum is 53d1bde4542365caf4849c56e6274617.
[#5427] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...>
2005/07/12
Hi,
[#5430] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2005/07/12
On 7/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
[#5436] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— nobu.nokada@...
2005/07/12
Hi,
[#5437] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2005/07/13
Hello,
[#5445] GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
I have found that the performance of current garbage collector
11 messages
2005/07/13
[#5451] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2101, was opened at 2005-07-14 15:30
5 messages
2005/07/14
[#5470] Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
5 messages
2005/07/15
[#5471] make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>
hi all,
6 messages
2005/07/15
[#5476] Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2005/07/16
[#5479] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing
— Doug Kearns <dougkearns@...>
2005/07/16
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:11:34AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5492] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — noreply@...
Bugs item #2131, was opened at 2005-07-19 17:34
9 messages
2005/07/19
[#5498] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2005/07/21
[#5499] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2005/07/21
[#5513] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2005/07/24
Re: Subversion
From:
Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date:
2005-07-01 08:35:14 UTC
List:
ruby-core #5315
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Shugo Maeda wrote: >> I wouldn't say subversion is better yet, just different. > > I think good points of Subversion are: > > : Not based on single file > CVS is based on single file, and doesn't support rename and > removal > well. Subversion gives a revision to changes in all related > changes > per commit, so it's easy to track changes. > : Security > Subversion is not perfect, but more secure than CVS. > We can use HTTPS and basic auth, so committers doesn't need > Unix accounts any more, and extra ports like pserver are not > necessary. > : Easy to maintain > The complexity of loginfo of CVS is my headache. (I think it's > also > eban's headache) > post-commit of Subversion and `svnadmin dump' is easy to use. > `svnadmin dump' also supports incemental backup. > : Trac > Trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/) is an issue tracking system. > Trac and Subversion are good friends. We can close a bug just to > write a ticket number in a commit log like: > > fixed something. (closes #1234) > > Trac has also a good repository browser for Subversion. > Please see http://dev.rubyonrails.com/ for example. *nod* These are all very good points, and with the exception of trac (although there is an open bug on this exception), all of these points are also supported by perforce. Perforce is free for open- source development and is used by larger groups like freebsd (http:// perforce.freebsd.org/). The clients are free to anyone and available on just about every version of every OS under the sun. It also has some other benefits: + Some commands/options just seem so much more straightforward (p4 sync -n to see what you WOULD get if you sync'd, not svn -u st). At least they do to me. + Merging is much easier + Much more uniform use of revision identifiers across nearly all commands + Repository diffs are FAST (10x faster by my unscientific measure). + p4 opened -a (who has what open?) is _awesome_. + p4 describe $revision is _awesome_ (and much much faster than the equivalent in svn). + underneath it all, still rcs files, no binary DB to corrupt (there are binary DBs for metadata) + Proven scalability. + Much more mature and bug free.