Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String

Eric Mahurin wrote:

> They could also be easily extended to Bignum when you need more from
> the encoding - an arbitrary sequence of bytes could be put into a
> Bignum.

Why would you want to do this?  What gives you the idea that a Bignum
would be more efficient than a String anyway?

> The main exception to that I can think of is when you have an excess
> of zero bytes.  "\000\000\000\000" and "\000" couldn't be
> distinguished when you put them into an Integer.

So perhaps they shouldn't be?,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}