From: Nikolai Weibull Date: 2005-07-04T08:11:32+09:00 Subject: Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String Eric Mahurin wrote: > The main difference I saw was that a character would be > represented as String rather than a Fixnum. I'd rather see it > remain an Integer to handle the unicode encodings - Fixnum when > that is enough and Bignum where needed. That would give better > compatibility. And efficiency when dealing with encodings that > fit in a Fixnum. Eh, it's hardly a problem of having something to store Unicode codepoints in. A Unicode codepoint fits in 21 bits, nikolai -- Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/! Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden. main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}