Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String

Eric Mahurin wrote:

> The main difference I saw was that a character would be
> represented as String rather than a Fixnum.  I'd rather see it
> remain an Integer to handle the unicode encodings - Fixnum when
> that is enough and Bignum where needed.  That would give better
> compatibility.  And efficiency when dealing with encodings that
> fit in a Fixnum.

Eh, it's hardly a problem of having something to store Unicode
codepoints in.  A Unicode codepoint fits in 21 bits,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}