[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
--- Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull
Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5388] Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...>
I recently installed PGP 9.0 on my Windows XP SP2 machine. At that point,
[#5391] Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Since Rexexp#=~ and String#=~ return nil if they fail to match,
Hi,
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5409] socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>
If I am reading s_recvfrom correctly in can throw an error which kills
[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!
Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!
Hi,
The MD5 sum is 53d1bde4542365caf4849c56e6274617.
Hi,
On 7/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[#5445] GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
I have found that the performance of current garbage collector
[#5451] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2101, was opened at 2005-07-14 15:30
[#5470] Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5471] make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>
hi all,
[#5476] Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:11:34AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5492] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — noreply@...
Bugs item #2131, was opened at 2005-07-19 17:34
Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released
Thanks everyone for the feedback so far! There were a few show stoppers that people found pretty quickly so I've rereleased the tar.gz and update svn. Available at: http://blog.fallingsnow.net/archive/sydney-dr1.tar.gz On 7/11/05, Evan Webb <evanwebb@gmail.com> wrote: > Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released! > > Release Announcment; > http://blog.fallingsnow.net/articles/2005/07/11/sydney-developer-preview-release-1-out > > Tarball: http://blog.fallingsnow.net/archive/sydney-dr1.tar.gz > > Sydney is an experimental fork of ruby 1.8.2 that implements a number > of new features, such as Native OS threads, Backtrace and Frame > objects, more event hooks, and many more. > > It has reached the a developer release phase after a few months of > development and testing, but it is not ready for primetime! It still > contains many issues that must be resolved before it can be considered > production quality. > > Note that it ONLY implements pthread OS threads at the moment, but > work to implement win32 threads is planned to begin soon. > > Currently, some conventions that I've interested have broken RDoc's > ability to properly generate from my new C files. That will be fixed > soon, but in the mean time, please consult the tests > (test/sydney/*.rb) for examples and documention of the new features. > > I'm sure there will be a number questions about this, so let me answer > of few of them here: > > Q: Why did you do all this work on the 1.8 branch and not off of head? > A: I did this because I did not want a moving target in terms of > existing functonality. I was already breaking a number of the > internals and wanted to be able to run reliable tests to monitor my > changes. If I had done my changes against head (1.9) I could have run > into bugs that were not caused by my changes and would therefore been > much harder to fix. > > Q: Was this endorsed by the current ruby core developers? > A: No, it was not. I did the work external from them completely, but I > hope that that will change soon. > > Q: Do you have something against the ruby core developers? > A: No, I do not. They have done an amazing job with the current > releases and none of my work would have been remotely possible without > their work. > > Q: Why did you go and implement these features? > A: Sydney started as an experiment to get familar with the internals > of ruby. I then began to see the need for most of these features > either in RCR's or just in general, and thus I decided to, as one of > my side projects, see how well they could be accomplished. > > In the end, I did a lot of this because I found it interesting. And I > know the their are people and applications out there that are eager > for these features. > > I look forward to feedback of all kinds. > > Evan Webb // evan@fallingsnow.net >