ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift

24 messages 2005/07/01
[#5338] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/02

On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5348] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/02

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5357] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/03

On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5359] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/03

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5361] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/03

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5362] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/03

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5364] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/07/03

Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5365] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

Hi,
[#5367] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/04

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5368] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

Hi,
[#5372] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/07/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5375] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/04

--- Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#5376] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/04

On 7/4/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
[#5378] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

[#5379] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/04

Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5380] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/04

--- Nikolai Weibull
[#5381] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/04

Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5382] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/04

On 7/4/05, Nikolai Weibull
[#5383] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/04

Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#5377] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

[#5387] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/07/05

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5389] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/06

Hi,
[#5363] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/03

Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5369] Compile of ext\ripper\ripper.c fails during 1.9 [bccwin] build — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>

3 messages 2005/07/04
[#5371] Re: Compile of ext\ripper\ripper.c fails during 1.9 [bccwin] build — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/07/04

Hi,
[#5384] Re: Compile of ext\ripper\ripper.c fails during 1.9 [bccwin] build — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/04

[#5374] Subversion repository for tests — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/07/04

[#5386] typo in ossl_pkcs12.h — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

patch in the attachment

1 message 2005/07/05

[#5388] Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...>

I recently installed PGP 9.0 on my Windows XP SP2 machine. At that point,

5 messages 2005/07/05
[#5390] Re: Problem with socket communications on Windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2005/07/06

Hello,
[#5488] Re: Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...> 2005/07/18

On Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:33 PM, U.Nakamura <mailto:usa@garbagecollect.jp>
[#5392] Re: Problem with socket communications on Windows — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/07/06

Hi,
[#5393] Re: Problem with socket communications on Windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2005/07/06

Hello,

[#5391] Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Since Rexexp#=~ and String#=~ return nil if they fail to match,

12 messages 2005/07/06
[#5396] Re: Object#=~ — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/06

Hi,
[#5397] Re: Object#=~ — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/06

[#5401] Re: Object#=~ — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/06

Hi,
[#5411] Re: Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/07/07

[#5402] Re: Object#=~ — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/06

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5403] Re: Object#=~ — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/07/06

On 06 Jul 2005, at 09:30, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5405] Re: Object#=~ — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/06

[#5406] Re: Object#=~ — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/07/06

On 06 Jul 2005, at 10:06, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5407] Re: Object#=~ — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/06

--- Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#5408] Re: Object#=~ — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/07/06

On 06 Jul 2005, at 11:15, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5404] Re: Object#=~ — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/07/06

If I may jump in here:

[#5399] changes needed by openssl-0.9.8 — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

A few changes are needed for ruby to compile with the newly-released

1 message 2005/07/06

[#5409] socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>

If I am reading s_recvfrom correctly in can throw an error which kills

4 messages 2005/07/07
[#5410] Re: socket.c - s_recvfrom — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/07

Hi,
[#5412] Re: socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...> 2005/07/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5413] Socket documentation [Was: Re: socket.c - s_recvfrom] — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/07/07

On 07 Jul 2005, at 05:39, Zach Dennis wrote:

[#5414] Querying private singleton methods — Pit Capitain <pit@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2005/07/08
[#5490] Re: Querying private singleton methods — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/07/19

Pit Capitain <pit <at> capitain.de> writes:

[#5415] Possible Bug in Documentation or implementation of srand — Charles Comstock <dgtized@...>

According to documentation srand of 0 is supposed to reset srand to

1 message 2005/07/08

[#5416] Observer patch — nornagon <nornagon@...>

Hi all.

3 messages 2005/07/08
[#5418] Re: Observer patch — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/07/08

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, nornagon wrote:
[#5519] Re: Observer patch — nornagon <nornagon@...> 2005/07/30

On 7/9/05, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:

[#5417] docs patch for class IPSocket, class Socket, and Socket.getservbyname, Socket.getaddrinfo — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

I don't have the time to continue, but if somebody is interested, I

1 message 2005/07/08

[#5419] The 'watch' command crashes the debugger if ruby is run with the -w flag — noreply@...

Bugs item #2096, was opened at 2005-07-09 22:00

1 message 2005/07/10

[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>

Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!

15 messages 2005/07/11
[#5421] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Luc Heinrich <lucsky@...> 2005/07/11

On 11 juil. 05, at 23:57, Evan Webb wrote:
[#5422] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2005/07/11

Hello Evan,
[#5424] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!
[#5425] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/12

Hi,
[#5426] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

The MD5 sum is 53d1bde4542365caf4849c56e6274617.
[#5427] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/07/12

Hi,
[#5430] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

On 7/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
[#5436] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/12

Hi,
[#5437] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/13

Hello,
[#5438] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/13

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Evan Webb wrote:
[#5439] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/13

On 7/12/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#5447] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/07/14

Quoting evanwebb@gmail.com, on Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:16:20AM +0900:
[#5429] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/12

Hi,
[#5431] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

Hm, ismbrchar was already there. If you're refering to the code that

[#5428] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2005/07/12
[#5432] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

Hm. I suspect that you might have a _C macro in ctype.h...

[#5433] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2005/07/12
[#5434] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

Ok, I've replaced all the _C with _CPATH in subversion. Tonight I'll

[#5440] Sydney DR2 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>

Sydney DR2 has been released.

4 messages 2005/07/13
[#5443] Re: [ANN] Sydney DR2 released — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/07/13

Hi,
[#5444] Re: [ANN] Sydney DR2 released — Luc Heinrich <lucsky@...> 2005/07/13

On 13 juil. 05, at 04:36, Evan Webb wrote:
[#5441] Re: [ANN] Sydney DR2 released — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2005/07/13

[#5442] Re: [ANN] Sydney DR2 released — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2005/07/13

[#5445] GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

I have found that the performance of current garbage collector

11 messages 2005/07/13
[#5446] Re: GC tweak — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/13

Hi,
[#5450] Re: GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/07/14

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#5454] Re: GC tweak — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/14

Hi,
[#5457] Re: GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/07/14

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5458] Re: GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/07/14

Stefan Kaes wrote:
[#5455] Re: GC tweak — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...> 2005/07/14

> I'm a bit curious what exactly is disallowed? Is it the late declaration
[#5448] Re: GC tweak — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/07/14

In article <200507132321.j6DNLsYA012297@sharui.nakada.niregi.kanuma.tochigi.jp>,
[#5449] Re: GC tweak — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/07/14

Hi,
[#5462] Re: GC tweak — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/14

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Stefan Kaes wrote:
[#5463] Re: GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/07/14

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#5451] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — noreply@...

Bugs item #2101, was opened at 2005-07-14 15:30

5 messages 2005/07/14
[#5456] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2101 ] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/14

Hi,
[#5459] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2101 ] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/07/14

Hi,
[#5461] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2101 ] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/14

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
[#5466] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2101 ] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/14

Hi,

[#5452] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2101 ] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — "Marrows, George A (GE Energy)" <george.marrows@...>

>Initial Comment:

2 messages 2005/07/14
[#5453] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2101 ] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/07/14

Marrows, George A (GE Energy) schrieb:

[#5460] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/07/14
[#5465] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/14

[#5464] ruby (v182 or CVS-HEAD) fails @ 'make' w/ OpenSSL v>= 0.9 — noreply@...

Bugs item #2105, was opened at 2005-07-14 12:58

1 message 2005/07/14

[#5467] ruby (v182 or CVS-HEAD) fails @ 'make' w/ OpenSSL v >= 0.9.8 — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>

hi all,

1 message 2005/07/14

[#5468] GC — tzurtch@...

I'm new in ruby's world,

2 messages 2005/07/15
[#5469] Re: GC — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/07/15

Hi,

[#5470] Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

5 messages 2005/07/15
[#5717] Re: Bogus age value from Etc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/09/04

Hi,
[#5719] Re: Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2005/09/05

[#5722] Re: Bogus age value from Etc — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/09/06

Hi,
[#5723] Re: Bogus age value from Etc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/09/06

Hi,

[#5471] make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>

hi all,

6 messages 2005/07/15
[#5472] Re: make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — Ben Schumacher <benschumacher@...> 2005/07/15

On 7/15/05, OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@speakeasy.net> wrote:
[#5473] Re: make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...> 2005/07/15

hi ben,
[#5474] Re: make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — Ben Schumacher <benschumacher@...> 2005/07/15

On 7/15/05, OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@speakeasy.net> wrote:
[#5475] Re: make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...> 2005/07/16

hi ben,
[#5477] Re: make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/16

Hi,

[#5476] Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2005/07/16
[#5478] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/16

Hi,
[#5479] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Doug Kearns <dougkearns@...> 2005/07/16

On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:11:34AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5480] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/07/16

[#5482] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/16

On 7/16/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#5484] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — mathew <meta@...> 2005/07/16

Eric Hodel wrote:
[#5485] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2005/07/16

Hello mathew,
[#5487] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — mathew <meta@...> 2005/07/16

Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5486] Re: Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/16

On 7/16/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5481] Bug in new enumerator code. — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2005/07/16
[#5483] Re: [PATCH] Bug in new enumerator code. — nobu.nokada@... 2005/07/16

Hi,

[#5489] http.rb cleanup — noreply@...

Patches item #2128, was opened at 2005-07-18 14:25

1 message 2005/07/18

[#5491] ruby win bcc32: Stable snapshot (Tue Jul 19) make fails — noreply@...

Bugs item #2130, was opened at 2005-07-19 16:23

1 message 2005/07/19

[#5492] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — noreply@...

Bugs item #2131, was opened at 2005-07-19 17:34

9 messages 2005/07/19
[#5500] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/22

[#5498] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/21

[#5499] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/07/21

[#5510] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/23

[#5513] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/24

[#5514] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/07/25

Hi.
[#5515] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/07/25

># _close calls CloseHandle for socket, and closesocket is called after the call.
[#5495] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/07/21

Hi.

[#5493] Ruby Hackers Guide Translation Request — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>

The response to the rather crude translation of 'Minero Aoki' work "Ruby

1 message 2005/07/20

[#5494] Reply to Ms Renzi — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>

1 message 2005/07/20

[#5496] Multiline Regexp Bug — xsdg <xsdg@...>

I was working on untangling some data for someone in #ruby-lang, and I think I

2 messages 2005/07/21
[#5497] Re: Multiline Regexp Bug — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/07/21

xsdg schrieb:

[#5501] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2005/07/22

[#5502] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2005/07/22
[#5503] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/07/22

[#5509] Kudos to them here coders — Brian Parkinson <parki@...>

Just wrote my first two extensions - one doing class manipulation

1 message 2005/07/23

[#5511] ^ and \A match in the middle of the string when using StringScanner.scan — noreply@...

Bugs item #2154, was opened at 2005-07-23 10:28

1 message 2005/07/23

[#5512] Problem with ruby 1.8.2 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 on Os X with DarwinPorts — Manuel Holtgrewe <purestorm@...>

Hi.

3 messages 2005/07/23
[#5516] Re: Problem with ruby 1.8.2 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 on Os X with DarwinPorts — Manuel Holtgrewe <purestorm@...> 2005/07/27

[#5517] Re: Problem with ruby 1.8.2 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 on Os X with DarwinPorts — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2005/07/27

Hi,

[#5518] thread scheduling problem with io on files in /proc on 1.8.2 — noreply@...

Bugs item #2186, was opened at 2005-07-29 14:23

1 message 2005/07/29

Bogus age value from Etc

From: Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2005-07-15 14:19:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #5470 
Hi all,

Ruby 1.8.2
Solaris 10

It looks like the "age" passwd value returned by Etc is bogus.

irb(main):001:0> require "etc"
=> true
irb(main):002:0> Etc.getpwnam(Etc.getlogin).age
=> 4100981

DDD shows me that the pw_age struct member is an empty string when I run 
a sample program.  Should it simply be set to nil in this case?

Regards,

Dan

PS - I realize that the pw_age value is not used on most (all?) systems, 
so this is a very minor issue.  I'm also curious as to why it was 
declared as a char*.

In This Thread

Prev Next