[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
--- Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull
Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5388] Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...>
I recently installed PGP 9.0 on my Windows XP SP2 machine. At that point,
[#5391] Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Since Rexexp#=~ and String#=~ return nil if they fail to match,
Hi,
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5409] socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>
If I am reading s_recvfrom correctly in can throw an error which kills
[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!
Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!
Hi,
The MD5 sum is 53d1bde4542365caf4849c56e6274617.
Hi,
On 7/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[#5445] GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
I have found that the performance of current garbage collector
[#5451] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2101, was opened at 2005-07-14 15:30
[#5470] Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5471] make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>
hi all,
[#5476] Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:11:34AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5492] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — noreply@...
Bugs item #2131, was opened at 2005-07-19 17:34
Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
Hi,
In message "Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String"
on Mon, 4 Jul 2005 12:55:51 +0900, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> writes:
|Do you have a preliminary spec of what the API is going to look
|like? I would mainly like to see what the definition the a
|character is going to be - instead of a Fixnum.
A character will be represented by a string that holds exactly one
character byte sequence. A Python Way.
|> We won't remove existing methods from both classes, although
|> we don't encourage illusion of strings being array of something.
|Why? For my purposes, I think of a String as a sequence of
|characters. I don't mind too much if the definition of a
|character changes (to something variable length or whatever),
|but I do need all the methods that access characters now to
|still access characters (and not just bytes) - []/slice, []=,
|slice!, <<, size/length.
You don't have to worry about. No methods will be changed, but they
will work based on characters, not on bytes as they do now.
|Also, did you have any opinion about the original topic on this
|thread? - making insertions/deletions at the front of an
|Array/String O(1). This would be useful when dealing with a
|large Array or String. You could also cut the random access
|insert/delete time in half by taking advantage of it.
I think the idea is pretty interesting. But I don't have enough
knowledge to estimate how much useful in general case. Let me think
for a while.
matz.