[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
--- Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull
Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#5388] Problem with socket communications on Windows — "Jim McMaster" <jim.mcmaster@...>
I recently installed PGP 9.0 on my Windows XP SP2 machine. At that point,
[#5391] Object#=~ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Since Rexexp#=~ and String#=~ return nil if they fail to match,
Hi,
Hi,
--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5409] socket.c - s_recvfrom — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>
If I am reading s_recvfrom correctly in can throw an error which kills
[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!
Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!
Hi,
The MD5 sum is 53d1bde4542365caf4849c56e6274617.
Hi,
On 7/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[#5445] GC tweak — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
I have found that the performance of current garbage collector
[#5451] bug in pstore (ruby 1.8.2) on Windows ( Win XP) ? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2101, was opened at 2005-07-14 15:30
[#5470] Bogus age value from Etc — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5471] make fail; ruby v182 not finding readline ? — OpenMacNews <OpenMacNews@...>
hi all,
[#5476] Bug in ruby's command line parsing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:11:34AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:
[#5492] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed — noreply@...
Bugs item #2131, was opened at 2005-07-19 17:34
Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > |> A character will be represented by a string that holds exactly one > |> character byte sequence. A Python Way. > | > |So "foo"[0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0] > |would be "f"? > > Yes. After some thinking I must say that I like the idea. Especially since then .downcase, .upcase and possibly others (.whitespace?, .letter?, .digit?) would automatically work on both strings and characters. One thing that might cause either inconsistency or the possibility of a speed-up might be returning a frozen one-character string. Frozen state in this case should not propagate so that "foo"[0] + "bar"[0] would produce an unfrozen "fb". I'm not sure if it is worth the small special case -- after all there already is COW style buffer sharing. Oh, and ?f is going to be considered an obsolete way of writing "f" in such a Ruby? Thanks for sharing your insights!