[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift

24 messages 2005/07/01
[#5338] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/02

On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5348] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/02

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#5357] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/03

On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5359] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/03

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#5361] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/03

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5362] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/03

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#5365] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

Hi,

[#5367] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/04

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#5368] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

Hi,

[#5372] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/07/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>

Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!

15 messages 2005/07/11
[#5424] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!

Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String

From: Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Date: 2005-07-05 15:46:22 UTC
List: ruby-core #5387
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> |> A character will be represented by a string that holds exactly one
> |> character byte sequence.  A Python Way.
> |
> |So "foo"[0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0] 
> |would be "f"?
> 
>  Yes.

After some thinking I must say that I like the idea. Especially since 
then .downcase, .upcase and possibly others (.whitespace?, .letter?, 
.digit?) would automatically work on both strings and characters.

One thing that might cause either inconsistency or the possibility of a 
speed-up might be returning a frozen one-character string. Frozen state 
in this case should not propagate so that "foo"[0] + "bar"[0] would 
produce an unfrozen "fb".

I'm not sure if it is worth the small special case -- after all there 
already is COW style buffer sharing.

Oh, and ?f is going to be considered an obsolete way of writing "f" in 
such a Ruby?

Thanks for sharing your insights!


In This Thread