[#5322] O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

I just did some benchmarks on push, pop, shift, and unshift

24 messages 2005/07/01
[#5338] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/02

On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5348] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/02

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#5357] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/03

On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5359] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/03

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#5361] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/07/03

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#5362] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/03

--- Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#5365] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

Hi,

[#5367] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/07/04

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#5368] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/07/04

Hi,

[#5372] Re: O(1) performance for insertions/deletions at the front of an Array/String — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/07/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5420] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>

Sydney, an experimental ruby interpreter, has been released!

15 messages 2005/07/11
[#5424] Re: [ANN] Sydney Developer Preview 1 released — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/07/12

Thanks everyone for the feedback so far!

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2131 ] ruby ( v183) bcc32: using Socket.new with timeout -> files not closed

From: "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
Date: 2005-07-24 02:52:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #5513
From: daz  (me)


>
> After applying the patch, our script now gives:
>
> D:/RUBY/SRC_CVSINST/lib/ruby/1.9/net/http.rb:507:in `initialize':
>                           getaddrinfo: no address associated with hostname. (SocketError)


That result was INCORRECT.
  (ISP maintenance when I ran that script yesterday)
Sorry for the confusion.

This is the result after the win32 'setmode' patch:

["Net::HTTP", "1.126", "1.1"]
D:/RUBY/SRC_CVSINST/lib/ruby/1.9/net/protocol.rb:70:in `close': Bad file number (Errno::EBADF)


(So, the 'setmode' patch doesn't change anything for Win98/se)  :-(
Tested with _and_ without your patch here:
http://www.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ruby/ext/socket/socket.c.diff?r1=1.148;r2=1.149;f=h
(EBADF both times)


daz
-- 

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/closesocket_2.asp





In This Thread