[#5143] Win32API segfault in 1.8.3p1 — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
I'm on Windows XP, using VC7 to compile. I've previously gotten a good
Hi,
[#5151] COPY and INSTALL on Windows — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
1.8.3p1 has changed the defaults for the COPY and INSTALL Makefile
[#5152] 1.8.3 p1 segfault in array.c- bccwin32 - bcc5.5 (free) compiler bug — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
[#5160] Alternative for win32\ifchange.bat — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
[#5179] Cannot build HEAD on OS X 10.4.1 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Somehow the rb_fd_init macro is conflicting with the definition of
Hi,
Hi,
[#5188] Re: IO#read — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#5190] Resolv and TTL — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I would like to retrieve the TTL values from Resolv, but they seem to
[#5206] Object#inspect() doesn't return; uses 100% cpu — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
Is this something I could have caused by overriding some method on the
[#5211] ruby 1.8 CVS do not work with --enable-pthread configure option — noreply@...
Bugs item #2038, was opened at 2005-06-16 13:57
[#5215] Hackers Guide Translation Request! — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
I have recently discovered RUBY and want to understand it a deep level -
[#5219] Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...>
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:03:18 +0900
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:51:07 +0900
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:28:53 +0900
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:05:56 +0900
[#5233] event_hook shows weirdness when invoked on mixed in methods — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
The following attachment, when run, shows the following behavior:
[#5264] XMLRPC vulnerabilities? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've just seen this (by RSS)
[#5267] RubyUnit Test Ordering — Jordan Gilliland <jordan@...>
I'm using ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i686-linux] and I've noticed that the
[#5277] Macros in win32.h — james@...
win32.h defines a load of macros. This means any C or C++ program which embeds
[#5288] committing rdoc additions corrections to head? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
There is some discussion on ruby-doc about people documenting core
[#5296] Subversion — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
Shugo Maeda wrote:
Curt Hibbs wrote:
On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 6/30/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 7/1/05, Nikolai Weibull
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Thursday 30 June 2005 19:19, mathew wrote:
"Sean E. Russell" <ser@germane-software.com> writes:
On 30 Jun 2005, at 08:19, Shugo Maeda wrote:
Hi,
Re: Subversion
On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull
<mailing-lists.ruby-core@rawuncut.elitemail.org> wrote:
> Austin Ziegler wrote:
> > On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull
> > <mailing-lists.ruby-core@rawuncut.elitemail.org> wrote:
> > > While we're at it, why not look at better alternatives to CVS than
> > > Subversion, which is basically any other SCM (other than CVS). Bazaar
> > > (http://bazaar.canonical.com/) has many positive properties over
> > > Subversion, for one,
> > Don't see them. I'm not much for disconnected versioning systems; I
> > *do* prefer the Perforce, ClearCase, CVS, and SVN model. Not only
> > that, Bazaar doesn't yet run on my chosen platform.
> You can still use Bazaar as a centralized SCM and there's a Cygwin port
> as far as I know (if that's your chosen platform).
Cygwin is not an answer. Ever.
Sorry, but that's a lazy answer. If there's not a native port to a
chosen platform, then the platform is unsupported.
> I don't see how anyone can prefer the centralized model either. The
> decentralized/disconnected model is a superset of the centralized,
> right?,
Mmmm. Sometimes, maybe. But it works differently.
-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca