[#5219] Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2005/06/16
[#5220] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/06/16

[#5221] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — Michel Pastor <K@...> 2005/06/16

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:03:18 +0900

[#5223] Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2005/06/17

Hi,

[#5296] Subversion — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

64 messages 2005/06/30
[#5297] Re: Subversion — Curt Hibbs <curt@...> 2005/06/30

Shugo Maeda wrote:

[#5298] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/06/30

Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#5301] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull

[#5304] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/06/30

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5305] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, Nikolai Weibull

[#5307] Re: Subversion — mathew <meta@...> 2005/06/30

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5308] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/06/30

On 6/30/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5311] Re: Subversion — mathew <meta@...> 2005/07/01

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#5323] Re: Subversion — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/07/01

On 7/1/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#5325] Re: Subversion — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/07/01

Austin Ziegler wrote:

Re: Segmentation fault in timeout.rb

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2005-06-19 17:06:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #5252
Hi,

At Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:59:02 +0900,
Michel Pastor wrote in [ruby-core:05250]:
> > Thank you, and may I ask you one more?  What's th and *th?
> 
> np I'm very interested in this nice project and will be happy to help

Thank you.

> $9 = {next = 0x202d2020, prev = 0x6b636f6c, context = {{__jmpbuf = {1652043808, 1630680375, 979578930, 1853190688, -1073872838, 134667905}, __mask_was_saved = 6897, __saved_mask = {__val = {3221137032, 

Hmmm..., seems completely wrong pointer.

  $ ruby -e 'p [0x202d2020, 0x6b636f6c, 1652043808, 1630680375,
  979578930, 1853190688, -1073872838, 134667905].pack("V*").split(/\0/,2)[0]'
  "  - lock 0xb752a20c: run:"

Perhaps, a register would be assigned to the variable and
reused in subsequent function calls.

Could you show *(curr->next) and *(curr->next->node) instead?

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread