[#4834] Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:48, ts wrote:
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:57, ts wrote:
[#4844] Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4848] No way to change socket timeout on opened URI — noreply@...
Bugs item #1878, was opened at 2005-05-05 17:55
[#4855] Method hooks in singleton classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Hello Ruby-maintainers,
[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...
Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#4869] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Hello all,
Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:
Pit Capitain wrote:
Ryan Davis wrote:
ES wrote:
On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 22:09, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Francois GORET wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4881] Encoding Pragma — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#4886] ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-05-12 17:49]:
>What about [ruby-core:4296]?
[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...
Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
On 5/12/05, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for
Hi,
Nakada, Nobuyoshi wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
On 5/14/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4932] ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've just tried to build the preview and got:
[#4992] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — noreply@...
Bugs item #1917, was opened at 2005-05-14 21:33
In article <200505142133.j4ELXEaM011256@rubyforge.org>,
Hello.
In article <20050515153530.0D9F30E0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,
[#5006] Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi all,
[#5010] - Function Argument Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
As a general rule, the first argument to a function should be the
[#5020] Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
[#5039] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — noreply@...
Bugs item #1930, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:45
Hi,
Thu, 19 May 2005 13:09:45 +0900, nobuyoshi nakada
Hi,
[#5040] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — noreply@...
Bugs item #1931, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:46
On Thu, 19 May 2005 noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2005 21:22:46 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#5068] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
On 5/22/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net>
Hi,
[#5070] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
[#5075] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
Quoting Daniel.Berger@qwest.com, on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:58PM +0900:
[#5107] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Liskov Substitution Principle (was: Pathname)
Something weird happened to my last message while trying to send it, so I'm sending it again, just in case. (and changing the topic too) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:28:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Subject: Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped On Tue, 24 May 2005, Sam Roberts wrote: > Sometimes called Liskov substitution principle. >> never override any method in a subclass, because hey, people might not >> expect different behavior. > You derive to override implementation, not behaviour. To be precise, what's normally called a "subtype" may have its apparent behaviour be different from its "supertype" in a few ways. Let me try to explain this in my own words. The Liskov requirements (from my memory) are that IF the arguments and state for the execution of a method are valid (preconditions), THEN the message should have the expected effects and return values (postconditions). This is a logical implication, like this: Precond(method,pre_state,args) -> Postcond(method,post_state,return) So you can do this in a subtype (relative to what it is in the supertype): 1. make the preconds looser 2. make the postconds stricter 3. make the postconds looser but only in the cases where the preconds are being used in a looser way. The point is that in a subtype, satisfying the Pre->Post implies satisfying the Pre->Post of the supertype. The above three cases are the three ways that semantics can be extended without violating expectations. So, in short, Liskov's substitution principle can be written: (SubPre -> SubPost) -> (SuperPre -> SuperPost) again as a logical implication. Does that sound accurate? ,-o--------o--------o--------o-. ,---. irc.freenode.net #dataflow | | The Diagram is the Program tm| | ,-o-------------o--------------o-. `-o------------o-------------o-' | | Mathieu Bouchard (Montr饌l QC) | | t駘駱hone:+1.514.383.3801`---' `-o-- http://artengine.ca/matju -'