[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash?

From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
Date: 2005-05-05 13:41:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #4841
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:31, ts wrote:
> >>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
>
> A>  irb(main):033:0> {1=>2}=={1=>2} => true
> A>  irb(main):034:0> {1=>2}==={1=>2} => true
> A>  irb(main):035:0> {1=>2}.eql?({1=>2}) => false
>
> svg% ./irb
> irb(main):001:0> RUBY_VERSION
> => "1.9.0"
> irb(main):002:0> {1=>2}=={1=>2}
> => true
> irb(main):003:0> {1=>2}==={1=>2}
> => true
> irb(main):004:0> {1=>2}.eql?({1=>2})
> => true
> irb(main):005:0> svg%
>
>
> Guy Decoux

So 1.9 does what I would consider to be the _right thing_ :)

So, whats the best way to modify the behaviour of Hash, to fix the bug in 
versions prior to 2004-12-25, and make the behaviour consistent across 1.8 
and 1.9, such that Hash#[], hash#update etc etc work as per 1.9.

I'm sure this must be easy.......Override eql? ?

Andrew

In This Thread