[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

[PATCH] Silly bug in 1.8's YAML

From: Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Date: 2005-05-19 18:38:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #5055
Hi,
Ruby 1.8's YAML will use the "new" method to instantiate objects, but it
should use "allocate" instead. Otherwise, there might be trouble with
new/initialize that take arguments.

This is fixed in Ruby 1.9/Syck CVS, but I think it should go in 1.8,
too.

Regards,
Tilman

-- 
learn to quote: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

Attachments (1)

ruby-yaml_fix.diff (498 Bytes, text/x-diff)
diff -aur ruby-1.8.3.orig/lib/yaml/rubytypes.rb ruby-1.8.3/lib/yaml/rubytypes.rb
--- ruby-1.8.3.orig/lib/yaml/rubytypes.rb	2004-08-18 22:54:40.000000000 +0200
+++ ruby-1.8.3/lib/yaml/rubytypes.rb	2005-05-19 20:32:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
     if Array === val
         type, obj_class = YAML.read_type_class( type, Array )
         if obj_class != Array
-            o = obj_class.new
+            o = obj_class.allocate
             o.concat( val )
             val = o
         end

In This Thread

Prev Next