[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: Forwardable, reworked

From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2005-05-17 19:22:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #5036
On 17 May 2005, at 11:38, Berger, Daniel wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric Hodel [mailto:drbrain@segment7.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:05 AM
>> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
>> Subject: Re: Forwardable, reworked
>>
>> I think I would rather see:
>>
>> delegate :@number, :to_i
>> delegate :@string, :to_s, :reverse
>>
>> def delegate(ivar, *methods)
>>    methods.each { |method| def_instance_delegator ivar, method } end
>>
>
> It's six one way and half a dozen the other.  Both look good to me,
> though the officially submitted patch uses the reversed, hash style  
> that
> Florian originally suggested.  If you feel strongly about it, please
> post a response to Patch 1923 on RubyForge.  Matz and/or Tanaka may
> agree with you.

Agreed, I only felt strongly enough to mention it here.

>> The kind_of? feels so clumsy.  (And I forgot how String#each worked
>> since I never use it.)
>>
>
> Actually, I replaced that line in the submitted patch with:
>
> methods = methods.to_s unless methods.respond_to?(:each).  Just a wee
> bit of duck typing to keep things sane.

Great!

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04


In This Thread

Prev Next