[#4834] Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:48, ts wrote:
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:57, ts wrote:
[#4844] Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4848] No way to change socket timeout on opened URI — noreply@...
Bugs item #1878, was opened at 2005-05-05 17:55
[#4855] Method hooks in singleton classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Hello Ruby-maintainers,
[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...
Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#4869] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Hello all,
Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:
Pit Capitain wrote:
Ryan Davis wrote:
ES wrote:
On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 22:09, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Francois GORET wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4881] Encoding Pragma — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#4886] ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-05-12 17:49]:
>What about [ruby-core:4296]?
[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...
Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
On 5/12/05, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for
Hi,
Nakada, Nobuyoshi wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
On 5/14/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4932] ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've just tried to build the preview and got:
[#4992] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — noreply@...
Bugs item #1917, was opened at 2005-05-14 21:33
In article <200505142133.j4ELXEaM011256@rubyforge.org>,
Hello.
In article <20050515153530.0D9F30E0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,
[#5006] Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi all,
[#5010] - Function Argument Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
As a general rule, the first argument to a function should be the
[#5020] Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
[#5039] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — noreply@...
Bugs item #1930, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:45
Hi,
Thu, 19 May 2005 13:09:45 +0900, nobuyoshi nakada
Hi,
[#5040] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — noreply@...
Bugs item #1931, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:46
On Thu, 19 May 2005 noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2005 21:22:46 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#5068] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
On 5/22/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net>
Hi,
[#5070] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
[#5075] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
Quoting Daniel.Berger@qwest.com, on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:58PM +0900:
[#5107] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command
Konbanwa,
On Thu, 19 May 2005 20:08:57 +0900, nobuyoshi nakada
<nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 19 May 2005 17:18:54 +0900,
> Zev Blut wrote in [ruby-core:05044]:
>> > It is exactly expected behavior.
>>
>> OK. It would be nice if that was in the documentation somewhere, so
>> that other people do not make the same mistake.
>
> $ ri CGI.escapeHTML | cat
> -------------------------------------------------------- CGI::escapeHTML
> CGI::escapeHTML(string)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Escape special characters in HTML, namely &\"<>
>
> CGI::escapeHTML('Usage: foo "bar" <baz>')
> # => "Usage: foo "bar" <baz>"
>
Thanks, I should have double checked the documents before making the
above comment.
>> > The way to let escapeHTML not to escape a particular ampersand is
>> > another story.
>>
>> I can see the need for the current behavior and of course I have the
>> need for the changed behavior. Two techniques for providing a
>> preserving escape come to my mind. One would be to add an optional
>> boolean argument that when true will keep escape commands, the
>> default value is false and thus current usage will not change. Another
>> is to add another method that implements the patch provided in the
>> report.
>
> Leaving ampersands breaks round-trip by escapeHTML and unescapeHTML.
> I think it would be a problem.
I don't think this breaks round-trip usage. See below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
require 'cgi'
def patch_escape(string)
# using tmp to prevent line wrapping in this mail.
tmp = string.gsub(/&(?!(\S+);)/n, '&').gsub(/\"/n, '"')
tmp.gsub(/>/n, '>').gsub(/</n, '<')
end
# sample text is emoji
txt = 'Hello & 500 ¥ please."  moji "'
puts txt
#=> Hello & 500 ¥ please."  moji "
puts CGI.escapeHTML(txt)
#=> Hello & 500 &yen; please." &#63651; moji "
puts patch_escape(txt)
#=> Hello & 500 ¥ please."  moji "
puts CGI.unescapeHTML(patch_escape(txt))
#=> Hello & 500 ¥ please."  moji "
puts CGI.unescapeHTML(CGI.escapeHTML(txt))
#=> Hello & 500 ¥ please."  moji "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope the above makes it clear. Sorry for the use of emoji, but that
was what alerted me to my usage problem in the first place.
Best,
Zev