ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#4825] mysql_adapter question — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi everyone,

2 messages 2005/05/01
[#4826] Re: mysql_adapter question — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/05/01

Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#4828] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1859 ] URI.escape/unescape does the wrong thing with spaces — 卜部昌平 <s-urabe@...>

1 message 2005/05/03

[#4830] Trouble compiling ruby 1.8.2 on Intel ia64 — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

I'm running RedHat 4 on my Intel ia64 computer and have the following

1 message 2005/05/03

[#4832] Re: Trouble compiling ruby 1.8.2 on Intel ia64 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/05/04
[#4833] Re: Trouble compiling ruby 1.8.2 on Intel ia64 — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2005/05/05

On 23:54 Wed 04 May, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#4834] Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

10 messages 2005/05/05
[#4835] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/05

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#4836] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2005/05/05

On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:48, ts wrote:
[#4838] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/05

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#4839] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2005/05/05

On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:57, ts wrote:
[#4840] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/05

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#4842] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2005/05/05

On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:31, ts wrote:
[#4843] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/05

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#4841] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2005/05/05

On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:31, ts wrote:
[#4837] Re: Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2005/05/05

On a different (x86_64) machine with a newer version:

[#4844] Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>

Moin.

13 messages 2005/05/05
[#4845] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/05/05

[#4847] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/05/05

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4846] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/05/05

[#4850] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/06

Hi,
[#4851] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/06

[#4852] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/06

Hi,
[#4854] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4853] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/05/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4876] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2005/05/11

On Friday, May 6, 2005, 10:04:37 AM, Yukihiro wrote:
[#4878] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/11

Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#4877] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/05/11

Hi --
[#4880] Re: Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2005/05/11

Hi,

[#4848] No way to change socket timeout on opened URI — noreply@...

Bugs item #1878, was opened at 2005-05-05 17:55

3 messages 2005/05/05
[#4867] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1878 ] No way to change socket timeout on opened URI — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/07

In article <200505052255.j45MtVam031547@rubyforge.org>,
[#5698] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1878 ] No way to change socket timeout on opened URI — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/08/28

Hi.

[#4849] Array#slice!() adds elements to Array — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>

Moin.

2 messages 2005/05/05
[#4873] Re: [BUG?] Array#slice!() adds elements to Array — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/05/10

Thanks Florian. I'll look it over. I'm just getting back to work now.

[#4855] Method hooks in singleton classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>

Hello Ruby-maintainers,

5 messages 2005/05/06
[#4859] Re: Method hooks in singleton classes — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/06

Hi,
[#4860] Re: Method hooks in singleton classes — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/05/06

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4861] Re: Method hooks in singleton classes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,
[#4870] Re: Method hooks in singleton classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/09

Hi Matz, Nobu and Florian,

[#4856] Segfault in regular expression parsing on x86_64 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2005/05/06
[#4857] Re: Segfault in regular expression parsing on x86_64 — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/06

>>>>> "S" == Sean E Russell <ser@germane-software.com> writes:

[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,
[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,
[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,
[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5060] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/20

Hi,
[#5118] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/28

[#5128] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/06/01

Hi,
[#5129] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/06/02

[#5131] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/06/02

On 6/2/05, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#5132] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/06/03

On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Mark Hubbart wrote:
[#5133] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/06/03

Hi,
[#5134] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/06/03

Hi,
[#5135] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/06/03

[#5130] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/06/02

Hi,
[#5064] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/20

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5119] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/28

[#4863] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/07

On May 7, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4864] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,
[#4866] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — 卜部昌平 <s-urabe@...> 2005/05/07

[#4869] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Hello.

4 messages 2005/05/08
[#4956] Re: [BUG] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2005/05/13

H. Yamamoto (ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp) wrote:
[#4959] Re: [BUG] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/13

[#4960] Re: [BUG] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/13

[#4871] URI.parse fails to encode/decode IPv6 addresses — noreply@...

Bugs item #1890, was opened at 2005-05-09 22:03

1 message 2005/05/10

[#4872] Aliases for sec and min in date.rb — noreply@...

Patches item #1893, was opened at 2005-05-10 08:54

2 messages 2005/05/10
[#4875] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1893 ] Aliases for sec and min in date.rb — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/11

Hi,

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4988] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/14

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:
[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:
[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:
[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:
[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[#4893] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Alexander Kellett wrote:
[#4899] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/05/12

[#4903] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4905] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Francois GORET <fg@...> 2005/05/12

On Thursday 12 May 2005 22:09, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[#4910] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Francois GORET wrote:
[#4934] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4937] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4938] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4941] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/13

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4950] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — "Nakada, Nobuyoshi" <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/13

Hi,
[#4965] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/13

Nakada, Nobuyoshi wrote:
[#4892] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4895] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4900] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/05/12

On Thu, 12 May 2005, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[#4906] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#4897] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/05/12

Ilias Lazaridis, May 12:
[#4902] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#4912] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/05/12

Ilias Lazaridis, May 13:
[#4917] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#4896] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/05/12

Ilias Lazaridis, May 12:
[#4898] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/12

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
[#4904] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#4881] Encoding Pragma — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2005/05/11
[#4882] Re: Encoding Pragma — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4885] Re: Encoding Pragma — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4894] Re: Encoding Pragma — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4901] Re: Encoding Pragma — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4908] Re: Encoding Pragma — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4909] Re: Encoding Pragma — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4935] Re: Encoding Pragma — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/12

Hi,
[#4920] Re: Encoding Pragma — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2005/05/12

Hi,

[#4886] ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2005/05/12
[#4928] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/05/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-05-12 17:49]:
[#4948] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/13

>What about [ruby-core:4296]?
[#4952] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/05/13

H.Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> [2005-05-13 13:37]:
[#4954] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/05/13

On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 21:28 +0900, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
[#4994] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/15

[#5019] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/05/16

On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 10:07 +0900, H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#4973] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2005/05/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4995] REXML::Encoding (Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1) — speakillof <speakillof@...> 2005/05/15

Is it possible to port changes of REXML::Encoding to 1.8.3?
[#4907] Re: ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/05/12

On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 17:49 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4887] FXMemoryBuffer::data gives FXMemoryBuffer::to_s — noreply@...

Bugs item #1898, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:37

1 message 2005/05/12

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12
[#4913] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2005/05/12

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#4914] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/12

>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
[#4915] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2005/05/12

ts wrote:
[#4916] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — ts <decoux@...> 2005/05/12

>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
[#4918] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/12

On 5/12/05, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
[#4922] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2005/05/12

Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#4926] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/05/12

Hi --
[#4927] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/05/12

On Fri, 13 May 2005, David A. Black wrote:
[#4929] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/05/12

On Fri, 13 May 2005, David A. Black wrote:
[#4924] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12
[#4951] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — "Nakada, Nobuyoshi" <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/13

Hi,
[#4964] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/13

Nakada, Nobuyoshi wrote:
[#4966] Re: [SORES] - Hieroglyphical/Nodular Olfactory Fixture — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/05/13

[#4969] Re: [SORES] - Hieroglyphical/Nodular Olfactory Fixture — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/13

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4971] Re: [SORES] - Hieroglyphical/Nodular Olfactory Fixture — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/13

On May 13, 2005, at 8:27 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[#4987] Re: [SORES] - Hieroglyphical/Nodular Olfactory Fixture — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/14

Alexander Kellett wrote:
[#4975] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/14

Hi,
[#4979] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/05/14

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:
[#4983] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/14

Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#4982] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/14

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4989] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/14

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[#4990] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/14

On 5/14/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:
[#4991] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/14

Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#4996] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/15

Hi,
[#4997] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/15

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4998] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2005/05/15

Hi,
[#4999] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/15

Joao Pedrosa wrote:
[#5005] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/05/15

There seem to be several misconceptions here:
[#5008] Re: [SOURCES] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/15

Erik Huelsmann wrote:

[#4921] Re: Trouble compiling ruby 1.8.2 on Intel ia64 — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

Sorry I took so long to get back to this (busy like the rest of you).

2 messages 2005/05/12
[#4923] Re: Trouble compiling ruby 1.8.2 on Intel ia64 — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2005/05/12

Overdorf, Sam wrote:

[#4925] PLEASE Stop Ilias Now — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm spawning a new thread for the benefit of those with killfiles.

4 messages 2005/05/12
[#4939] Re: PLEASE Stop Ilias Now — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...> 2005/05/13

+1
[#4944] Re: PLEASE Stop Ilias Now — James Britt <ruby@...> 2005/05/13

Ryan Davis wrote:
[#4961] Re: PLEASE Stop Ilias Now — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2005/05/13

Hi,

[#4930] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/05/12
[#4946] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/13

[#4931] Makefile Error in OpenSSL Extension in 1.8.3 preview1 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1901, was opened at 2005-05-12 16:17

2 messages 2005/05/12
[#4942] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1901 ] Makefile Error in OpenSSL Extension in 1.8.3 preview1 — "Nakada, Nobuyoshi" <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/13

Hi,

[#4932] ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've just tried to build the preview and got:

5 messages 2005/05/12
[#4933] Re: ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/05/12

Excuse me replying to myself, but a build in /scratch/hgs works,
[#4943] Re: ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — "Nakada, Nobuyoshi" <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/13

Hi,
[#4962] Re: ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/05/13

On Fri, 13 May 2005, Nakada, Nobuyoshi wrote:
[#4963] Re: ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/05/13

To be extra certain I re-tried the patch on a fresh distribution,

[#4936] prefer '#include <errno.h>' over 'extern int errno' — noreply@...

Bugs item #1903, was opened at 2005-05-12 15:50

1 message 2005/05/12

[#4940] Delegate objects recurse infinitely on delegation to self — noreply@...

Bugs item #1905, was opened at 2005-05-13 11:39

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4945] - Function Naming Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

from class.c:

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4947] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

2 messages 2005/05/13
[#4949] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/13

[#4953] — Curt Hibbs <curt@...>

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4955] — Curt Hibbs <curt@...>

3 messages 2005/05/13
[#4957] Re: [Fwd: 1.8.3 preview 1 failure - win32/openssl] — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/13

>I just created a bug report for this:
[#4958] Re: [Fwd: 1.8.3 preview 1 failure - win32/openssl] — Curt Hibbs <curt@...> 2005/05/13

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#4967] - /todo, please update — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

the "todo" file looks outdated (13 months).

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4968] -Wall -W patch: bignum.c — noreply@...

Patches item #1909, was opened at 2005-05-13 11:19

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4970] Question about File.fnmatch — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2005/05/13
[#4976] Re: Question about File.fnmatch — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/14

Hi,

[#4972] RDoc consistency cleanup — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4974] - Different Development Paths, where? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

I've found the following project resources:

1 message 2005/05/13

[#4992] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — noreply@...

Bugs item #1917, was opened at 2005-05-14 21:33

8 messages 2005/05/14
[#4993] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/15

Hi,
[#5000] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/15

In article <200505142133.j4ELXEaM011256@rubyforge.org>,
[#5001] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/15

Hello.
[#5002] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/15

In article <20050515153530.0D9F30E0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,
[#5003] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/15

[#5004] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/05/15

[#5007] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1917 ] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/15

In article <20050515160537.8869DB70.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,

[#5006] Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Hi all,

5 messages 2005/05/15
[#5009] Re: Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/15

Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#5025] Re: Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/16

On 5/15/05, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> wrote:
[#5030] Re: Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/16

On May 16, 2005, at 8:12 PM, Mark Hubbart wrote:
[#5029] Re: Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2005/05/16

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#5010] - Function Argument Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

As a general rule, the first argument to a function should be the

7 messages 2005/05/15
[#5011] Re: [CODE] - Function Argument Conventions — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/05/15

Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> writes:
[#5012] Re: [CODE] - Function Argument Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/15

Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#5015] Re: [CODE] - Function Argument Conventions — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/15

Hi,
[#5016] Re: [CODE] - Function Argument Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/16

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#5018] Re: [CODE] - Function Argument Conventions — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/05/16

Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> [2005-05-16 10:23]:
[#5017] Re: [CODE] - Function Argument Conventions — "Nakada, Nobuyoshi" <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/16

Hi,

[#5013] - /class.c - seperate "module" specific code — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

File "class.c" keeps currently:

1 message 2005/05/15

[#5014] Forwardable, reworked — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2005/05/15
[#5026] Re: Forwardable, reworked — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/05/16

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#5028] Re: Forwardable, reworked — Robert McGovern <robert.mcgovern@...> 2005/05/16

> Nice work! I wonder if you could also add a nicer interface while you

[#5020] Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2005/05/16
[#5021] Re: Problems with the "outer scope" operator — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/16

[#5022] Re: Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Martin Hart <hart.martin@...> 2005/05/16

not sure if I entirely understand what you mean, but consider this:
[#5023] Re: Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2005/05/16

Hello Martin,
[#5024] Re: Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/05/16

People (myself included) put :: at the beginning to be absolutely sure
[#5031] Re: Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/16

On 5/16/05, Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:

[#5027] Re: Forwardable, reworked — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2005/05/16

[#5032] Re: Forwardable, reworked — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

3 messages 2005/05/17
[#5034] Re: Forwardable, reworked — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/05/17

On 17 May 2005, at 04:36, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#5037] Re: Forwardable, reworked — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2005/05/18

On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 3:04:52 AM, Eric wrote:

[#5033] Forwardable, reworked — noreply@...

Patches item #1923, was opened at 2005-05-17 07:50

1 message 2005/05/17

[#5035] Re: Forwardable, reworked — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/05/17
[#5036] Re: Forwardable, reworked — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/05/17

On 17 May 2005, at 11:38, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#5038] : [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>

: [BUG] unknown node type 0

1 message 2005/05/18

[#5039] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — noreply@...

Bugs item #1930, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:45

8 messages 2005/05/19
[#5041] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,
[#5044] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2005/05/19

Thu, 19 May 2005 13:09:45 +0900, nobuyoshi nakada
[#5054] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/05/19

On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 17:18 +0900, Zev Blut wrote:
[#5045] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,
[#5046] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2005/05/19

Konbanwa,
[#5048] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2005/05/19

I might have spoken too soon.
[#5061] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1930 ] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/20

Hi,

[#5040] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — noreply@...

Bugs item #1931, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:46

6 messages 2005/05/19
[#5047] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1931 ] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/05/19

On Thu, 19 May 2005 noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#5049] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1931 ] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#5050] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1931 ] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2005/05/19

On Thu, 19 May 2005 21:22:46 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#5052] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1931 ] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/05/19

Hi --
[#5059] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1931 ] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2005/05/20

On Thu, 19 May 2005 22:26:17 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net>

[#5042] Regexp#+@ can't be overridden — noreply@...

Bugs item #1932, was opened at 2005-05-18 21:19

2 messages 2005/05/19
[#5043] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1932 ] Regexp#+@ can't be overridden — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/19

noreply@rubyforge.org schrieb:

[#5051] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1931 ] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

1 message 2005/05/19

[#5055] Silly bug in 1.8's YAML — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2005/05/19
[#5166] Re: [PATCH] Silly bug in 1.8's YAML — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/06/07

Hi,
[#5171] Re: [PATCH] Silly bug in 1.8's YAML — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/06/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-06-08 00:13]:

[#5057] SSL patch for preview 3 — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>

Could the patch attached to [ruby-core:4663] be merged into 1.8 and

3 messages 2005/05/20
[#5062] Re: SSL patch for preview 3 — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...> 2005/05/20

Hi,
[#5063] Re: SSL patch for preview 3 — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2005/05/20

This is fine, just as long as the use of random session_id is the

[#5058] Add underscore method name aliases to the CGI class methods that currently have a camel case style method name. — noreply@...

Patches item #1934, was opened at 2005-05-20 11:46

1 message 2005/05/20

[#5065] Pathname, totally revamped — noreply@...

Patches item #1939, was opened at 2005-05-21 12:34

3 messages 2005/05/21
[#5074] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/23

In article <200505211934.j4LJYaJt003878@rubyforge.org>,
[#5067] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/22

Hi,

[#5066] Fixnum#** slower than Bignum#** — noreply@...

Bugs item #1940, was opened at 2005-05-22 00:15

2 messages 2005/05/21
[#5086] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1940 ] Fixnum#** slower than Bignum#** — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/24

Hi,

[#5068] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

10 messages 2005/05/22
[#5071] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/22

Hi,
[#5076] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/23

On 5/22/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net>
[#5078] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/23

Hi,
[#5082] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/24

On 5/23/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#5084] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/24

Hi,
[#5085] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/24

On 5/24/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
[#5089] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/25

Hi,
[#5069] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/05/22

[#5087] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2005/05/24

[#5070] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

--- daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> wrote:

4 messages 2005/05/22
[#5083] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2005/05/24

On Sunday, May 22, 2005, 11:50:48 PM, Daniel wrote:
[#5096] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/25

In article <42248233901.20050524140430@soyabean.com.au>,
[#5072] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/22

On 5/22/05, Daniel Berger <djberg96@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#5073] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

--- Mark Hubbart <discordantus@gmail.com> wrote:

1 message 2005/05/22

[#5075] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

7 messages 2005/05/23
[#5079] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/05/23

Quoting Daniel.Berger@qwest.com, on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:58PM +0900:
[#5080] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/05/24

[#5120] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/05/28

Wrote Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca>, on Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:28:28AM +0900:
[#5121] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/05/29

On Sun, 29 May 2005, Sam Roberts wrote:
[#5077] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/23

Hi,
[#5094] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/05/25

In article <8FE83020B9E1A248A182A9B0A7B76E73015E6BDC@itomae2km07.AD.QINTRA.COM>,

[#5081] Liskov Substitution Principle (was: Pathname) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

1 message 2005/05/24

[#5088] select() on non-sockets in eval.c — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

In eval.c, select is used to synchronize IO in ruby threads, but on some

3 messages 2005/05/24
[#5090] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/25

Hi,
[#5091] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/25

Hi,

[#5092] FTP, mostly questions, but a patch, too. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I was looking at RFC959 -- the FTP spec, because I wondereed if it

1 message 2005/05/25

[#5093] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

> It is replaced within win32/win32.[ch].

1 message 2005/05/25

[#5095] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

nobuyoshi nakada wrote:

1 message 2005/05/25

[#5097] Re: FTP, mostly questions, but a patch, too. — "Warren Brown" <warrenbrown@...>

Hugh,

2 messages 2005/05/25
[#5100] Re: FTP, mostly questions, but a patch, too. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2005/05/25

On Thu, 26 May 2005, Warren Brown wrote:

[#5098] shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

nobuyoshi nakada wrote:

3 messages 2005/05/25
[#5101] Re: shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/25

Hi,
[#5102] Re: shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/26

Hi,

[#5099] Re: Trouble compiling ruby 1.8.2 on Intel ia64 — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

I found the following info on a mail thread.

1 message 2005/05/25

[#5103] Re: shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

Nobu,

2 messages 2005/05/26
[#5109] Re: shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/05/27

Hi,

[#5104] will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

In Ruby 1.9 CVS, you can "call" local variables. i.e.

2 messages 2005/05/26
[#5106] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/26

Hi,

[#5105] Re: shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

Nobu,

1 message 2005/05/26

[#5107] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

7 messages 2005/05/26
[#5108] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/26

Hi,
[#5115] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/05/27

[#5116] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/27

Hi,
[#5117] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/05/27

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#5111] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/27

Eric Mahurin schrieb:
[#5112] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/05/27

On 5/27/05, Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> wrote:

[#5110] Shift-JIS encoded strings and YAML.load bug — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

1 message 2005/05/27

[#5113] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

Nobu, if I understand this code correctly, I think I see a problem:

2 messages 2005/05/27
[#5114] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/27

Hi,

[#5122] win32ole.c — noreply@...

Patches item #1967, was opened at 2005-05-30 00:34

1 message 2005/05/30

[#5124] Re: select() on non-sockets in eval.c — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

Nobu,

1 message 2005/05/30

[#5125] Re: shim for select() for VMS & general porting questions — BG - Ben Armstrong <BArmstrong@...>

nobuyoshi nakada wrote:

1 message 2005/05/30

[#5126] CGI::Cookie::parse does not properly parse set-cookie headers — noreply@...

Bugs item #1972, was opened at 2005-05-30 11:24

1 message 2005/05/30

[#5127] XMLRPC charset — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...>

Hello,

1 message 2005/05/31

Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in Array#select

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2005-05-12 20:54:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #4930 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dblack@wobblini [mailto:dblack@wobblini] On Behalf Of 
> David A. Black
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:55 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [ ruby-Patches-1900 ] Pointless argc check in 
> Array#select
> 
> 
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, David A. Black wrote:
> 
> > Hi --
> >
> > On Fri, 13 May 2005, Daniel Berger wrote:
> >> 
> >> Ah, here's the issue.
> >> 
> >> # test.rb
> >> a = [1,2,3]
> >> a.select # LocalJumpError
> >> 
> >> [].select # no error
> >> 
> >> I'd call that a bug.  I guess I better get crackin' with that test 
> >> suite,
> >> eh?
> >
> > Just to throw in the counter-argument:
> >
> > Since the block would never be executed with an empty array anyway, 
> > why enforce its presence?
> 
> Or, to put it more precisely:
> 
> It's 'yield' that raises the exception.  In this case:
> 
>    [].select
> 
> yield is never called.  So expecting an exception would be 
> sort of like expecting a ZeroDivisionError here:
> 
>     def z
>       return
>       puts 1/0
>     end
>     z
> 
> I now officially think that it is not a bug :-)

Ok, I can accept that. :)

Dan

In This Thread

Prev Next