[#4834] Fwd: Re: Whats so different about a Hash? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:48, ts wrote:
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 13:57, ts wrote:
[#4844] Getting rid of Object#equal?()? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4848] No way to change socket timeout on opened URI — noreply@...
Bugs item #1878, was opened at 2005-05-05 17:55
[#4855] Method hooks in singleton classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Hello Ruby-maintainers,
[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...
Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#4869] Infinite loop on YAML.dump (Re: ruby-list:40801) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Hello all,
Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:
Pit Capitain wrote:
Ryan Davis wrote:
ES wrote:
On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 22:09, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Francois GORET wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4881] Encoding Pragma — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#4886] ruby 1.8.3 preview1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-05-12 17:49]:
>What about [ruby-core:4296]?
[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...
Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
On 5/12/05, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for
Hi,
Nakada, Nobuyoshi wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
On 5/14/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
Hi,
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4932] ruby-1.8.3 preview1 - failure: cygwin. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've just tried to build the preview and got:
[#4992] Pathname#unlink fails on a symlink which points to a directory. — noreply@...
Bugs item #1917, was opened at 2005-05-14 21:33
In article <200505142133.j4ELXEaM011256@rubyforge.org>,
Hello.
In article <20050515153530.0D9F30E0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,
[#5006] Suggestion for avoiding incivilities — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi all,
[#5010] - Function Argument Conventions — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
As a general rule, the first argument to a function should be the
[#5020] Problems with the "outer scope" operator — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
[#5039] CGI::escapeHTML escapes the ampersand in an existing escape command — noreply@...
Bugs item #1930, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:45
Hi,
Thu, 19 May 2005 13:09:45 +0900, nobuyoshi nakada
Hi,
[#5040] Suggestion to add alias for underscore style method names to camel case named class methods in CGI — noreply@...
Bugs item #1931, was opened at 2005-05-19 11:46
On Thu, 19 May 2005 noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2005 21:22:46 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#5068] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
On 5/22/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net>
Hi,
[#5070] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
[#5075] Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
Quoting Daniel.Berger@qwest.com, on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:58PM +0900:
[#5107] Re: will callable objects be more general in Ruby 1.9? — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Re: PLEASE Stop Ilias Now
+1 Ilias won't get me to leave ruby-talk, but he's certainly making this place a lot less fun. He clearly knows little about Ruby, but doesn't hesitate to criticize Matz or present himself as an authority to newbies. Perhaps Ilias gets off on the fact that there's a thread dedicated to stopping him, but he does present a problem. As Ryan pointed out, he bothered the Lisp folks until they ignored him and he gave up. We need to do the same. It's sad to see the otherwise amazing Ruby community tarnished by such a lame troll. Bill On 5/12/05, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote: > > I'm spawning a new thread for the benefit of those with killfiles. > > On May 12, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Alexander Kellett wrote: > > On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > > > >> Feel free to open a new thread to discuss processing-models. > >> But please refrain from further off-topic messages in this thread. > >> > > > > if illias isn't blocked from this mailing list soon > > i'll be unsubscribing from this one also. > > > > this is just pathetic. > > I'm in the same boat. Please, stop this now. If we don't stop this > quickly, it will only get much much worse. Illias doesn't contribute, > he is the destroyer of the signal:noise, which was previously very > very good on ruby-core... He demands that things be done his way for > the benefit of his understanding only. He has done this to ruby-talk, > and many many groups before ruby. Despite protestations he is NOT > here to help us, only himself. > > He will demand that we explain and/or simplify every single line of > the makefile (as you've seen on his line-by-line "analysis" of > building miniruby. Any single line he doesn't understand, he'll ask > US to explain instead of doing any research on his own. If we don't > answer to his liking, he'll declare that we aren't helping and demand > explanation further. > > When he is done with the makefile, he will move to EVERY function of > EVERY C file in core ruby. He will insist that every single thing he > doesn't understand get explained for him (without doing any research > on his own), and then he'll demand that it get simplified. When I say > "EVERY function of EVERY C file in core ruby", I'm being as literal > and precise as I can be in my prediction. > > This list is NOT for that type of discussion, please, let's not make > it that now. Please, stop this now. I really don't want to leave this > list, in fact, I _need_ to be on this list. > > ----- Following is something Eric wrote up after doing research on > Ilias: > > check out this: > > http://www.tfeb.org/lisp/mad-people.html > > Especially: > > Ilias is currently (17-Sep-2002) being almost entirely ignored and > is crying alone to himself, while trying to join in various threads. > With luck if this continues he will get bored and wander off to > annoy people in some other newsgroup. He is one of the most > malignant posters to cll in recent history - between 27-Aug-2002 > and 24-Sep-2002 threads begin by him were about 1/4 of the articles > in cll. > > ----- > > Go read those threads. Seriously. They are an exact reflection of > what is being done to ruby. > > -- > ryand-ruby@zenspider.com - http://blog.zenspider.com/ > http://rubyforge.org/projects/ruby2c/ > http://rubyforge.org/projects/parsetree/ > http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubyinline/ > http://www.zenspider.com/seattle.rb > > -- Bill Atkins