[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: [ ruby-Patches-1939 ] Pathname, totally revamped

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2005-05-23 10:52:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #5074
In article <200505211934.j4LJYaJt003878@rubyforge.org>,
  noreply@rubyforge.org writes:

> * The cleanpath method works differently.

How different?

> The 'facade' requirement can be removed and that module can be inlined if you don't like the dependency.  It's only about 20 lines of code.

Is it possible to document the methods defined by facade using RDoc?

>       # Convert forward slashes to backslashes on Win32
>       path.tr!("/",@sep) if File::ALT_SEPARATOR

I think it's not Rubyish.
See [ruby-talk:52429].

>    # Returns the root directory of the path, or '.' if there is no root
>    # directory.
>    #
>    # On Unix, this means the '/' character.  On Win32 systems, this can
>    # refer to the drive letter, or the server and share path if the path
>    # is a UNC path.
>    def root
>       dir = "."   
>       if File::ALT_SEPARATOR
>          # We only want the portion up to the first '\0'
>          if @@PathStripToRoot.call(self) > 0
>             dir = self.split(0.chr).first
>          end
>       else
>          dir = File.dirname(self)
>          while dir != "/" && dir != "."
>             dir = File.dirname(dir)
>          end
>       end
>       dir = "." if dir.empty?
>       dir
>    end

The root method returns a string (not pathname).  Is it intentional?

In article <20050522135045.25083.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com>,
  Daniel Berger <djberg96@yahoo.com> writes:

> First, "+" works as you would expect. 
> Pathname.new("a") + Pathname.new("b") results in
> "a/b".

If Pathname inherits String, Pathname is-a String.
So some people (in some context) that Pathname.new("a") +
Pathname.new("b") results in "ab" as String.

It is impossible to fulfill both "a/b" and "ab".
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread

Prev Next